Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 Aug;122(4):737–747. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.737

Recombination between Homologies in Direct and Inverse Orientation in the Chromosome of Salmonella: Intervals Which Are Nonpermissive for Inversion Formation

A M Segall 1, J R Roth 1
PMCID: PMC1203750  PMID: 2547692

Abstract

Sequences placed in inverse order at particular chromosome sites (permissive) recombine to generate an inversion; the same sequences, placed at other sites (nonpermissive) interact recombinationally but do not form the expected inversion recombinants. We have investigated the events that occur between sequences at nonpermissive sites. Genetically marked lac operons in inverse order were placed at nonpermissive sites in a single chromosome and Lac(+) recombinants were selected. No inversions were formed. The Lac(+) recombinants recovered include double-recombinant types in which information appears to be reciprocally exchanged between the two lac operons. A second frequent recombinant type appears to have undergone a nonreciprocal information exchange; one mutant copy is repaired with no alteration of the other copy. Recombination within the lac operon is stimulated more than 100-fold by the presence of extensive homology (antenna sequences) outside of the region for which recombination is selected. Sequences placed in direct order at the ends of the same noninvertible chromosome segment recombine to form all the expected recombinant types including those in which a reciprocal exchange has generated a duplication. All the detected recombinant types can be accounted for by recombination between sister chromosomes. These results are discussed in terms of two alternative models. One explanation of the failure to detect inversion of some intervals is that particular inversions are lethal, despite the fact that no essential sequences are disrupted. Another explanation is that chromosome topology prevents sequences at nonpermissive sites in a single chromosome from engaging in the direct interaction required for inversion formation, but allows the sister strand exchanges that can generate the recombinant observed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. P., Roth J. R. Tandem chromosomal duplications in Salmonella typhimurium: fusion of histidine genes to novel promoters. J Mol Biol. 1978 Feb 15;119(1):147–166. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90274-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz D., Hushon J. M., Whitfield H. J., Jr, Roth J., Ames B. N. Procedure for identifying nonsense mutations. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jul;96(1):215–220. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.1.215-220.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Casadaban M. J., Cohen S. N. Lactose genes fused to exogenous promoters in one step using a Mu-lac bacteriophage: in vivo probe for transcriptional control sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4530–4533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Castilho B. A., Olfson P., Casadaban M. J. Plasmid insertion mutagenesis and lac gene fusion with mini-mu bacteriophage transposons. J Bacteriol. 1984 May;158(2):488–495. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.2.488-495.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan R. K., Botstein D., Watanabe T., Ogata Y. Specialized transduction of tetracycline resistance by phage P22 in Salmonella typhimurium. II. Properties of a high-frequency-transducing lysate. Virology. 1972 Dec;50(3):883–898. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(72)90442-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciampi M. S., Roth J. R. Polarity effects in the hisG gene of salmonella require a site within the coding sequence. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):193–202. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.2.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciampi M. S., Schmid M. B., Roth J. R. Transposon Tn10 provides a promoter for transcription of adjacent sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(16):5016–5020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.16.5016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foster T. J. Insertion of the tetracycline resistance translocation unit Tn10 in the lac operon of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Sep 9;154(3):305–309. doi: 10.1007/BF00571287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Halling S. M., Simons R. W., Way J. C., Walsh R. B., Kleckner N. DNA sequence organization of IS10-right of Tn10 and comparison with IS10-left. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Apr;79(8):2608–2612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill C. W., Harnish B. W. Inversions between ribosomal RNA genes of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7069–7072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Konrad E. B. Method for the isolation of Escherichia coli mutants with enhanced recombination between chromosomal duplications. J Bacteriol. 1977 Apr;130(1):167–172. doi: 10.1128/jb.130.1.167-172.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rebollo J. E., François V., Louarn J. M. Detection and possible role of two large nondivisible zones on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9391–9395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanderson K. E., Roth J. R. Linkage map of Salmonella typhimurium, edition VII. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Dec;52(4):485–532. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.4.485-532.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmid M. B., Roth J. R. Genetic methods for analysis and manipulation of inversion mutations in bacteria. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):517–537. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmid M. B., Roth J. R. Selection and endpoint distribution of bacterial inversion mutations. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):539–557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Segall A., Mahan M. J., Roth J. R. Rearrangement of the bacterial chromosome: forbidden inversions. Science. 1988 Sep 9;241(4871):1314–1318. doi: 10.1126/science.3045970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. VOGEL H. J., BONNER D. M. Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1956 Jan;218(1):97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang A., Roth J. R. Activation of silent genes by transposons Tn5 and Tn10. Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):875–885. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zieg J., Kushner S. R. Analysis of genetic recombination between two partially deleted lactose operons of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1977 Jul;131(1):123–132. doi: 10.1128/jb.131.1.123-132.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zipser D., Zabell S., Rothman J., Grodzicker T., Wenk M. Fine structure of the gradient of polarity in the z gene of the lac operon of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1970 Apr 14;49(1):251–254. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90392-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES