Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 Sep;123(1):191–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.191

Potential Germline Competition in Animals and Its Evolutionary Implications

I M Hastings 1
PMCID: PMC1203783  PMID: 2806882

Abstract

Mutation, mitotic crossing over and mitotic gene conversion can create genetic diversity in otherwise uniform diploid cell lineages. In the germline this diversification may result in competition between diploid germline phenotypes, with subsequent biases in the frequency of alleles transmitted to the offspring. Sperm competition is a well documented feature of many higher organisms and a model is developed to quantify this process. Competition, and hence selection, can also occur by differential survival of diploid lineages before meiosis. It is concluded that under certain circumstances germline selection is an efficient means of eliminating unfavorable alleles from the population. This does not require differences in adult fertility or viability which is the usual mechanism cited as causing changes in gene frequency in a population. It is proposed that such competition may play a role in maintaining the efficiency of basic metabolic pathways.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (696.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen J., McNaughton D. C. Spermatozoa: the probable selection of a small population by the genital tract of the female rabbit. J Reprod Fertil. 1974 Aug;39(2):297–310. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0390297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hartl D. L., Dykhuizen D. E., Dean A. M. Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):655–674. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Langley C. H., Voelker R. A., Brown A. J., Ohnishi S., Dickson B., Montgomery E. Null allele frequencies at allozyme loci in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1981 Sep;99(1):151–156. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Voelker R. A., Langley C. H., Brown A. J., Ohnishi S., Dickson B., Montgomery E., Smith S. C. Enzyme null alleles in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster: Frequencies in a North Carolina population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):1091–1095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Voelker R. A., Schaffer H. E., Mukai T. Spontaneous Allozyme Mutations in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: Rate of Occurrence and Nature of the Mutants. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):961–968. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES