Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1989 Dec;123(4):873–885. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.873

On the Origin of Meiotic Reproduction: A Genetic Modifier Model

M K Uyenoyama 1, B O Bengtsson 1
PMCID: PMC1203896  PMID: 2612898

Abstract

We study the conditions under which a rare allele that modifies the relative rates of meiotic reproduction and apomixis increases in a population in which meiotic reproduction entails selfing as well as random outcrossing. A distinct locus, at which mutation maintains alleles that are lethal in homozygous form, determines viability. We find that low viability of carriers of the lethal alleles, high rates of selfing, dominance of the introduced modifier allele, and lower rates of recombination promote the evolution of meiosis. Meiotic reproduction can evolve even in the absence of linkage between the modifier and the viability locus. The adaptive value of meiotic reproduction depends on the relative viabilities of offspring derived by meiosis and by apomixis, and on associations between the modifier and the viability locus. Meiotic reproduction, particularly under selfing, generates more diverse offspring, including those with very high and very low viability. Elimination of offspring with low viability generates positive associations between enhancers of meiotic reproduction and high viability. In addition, partial selfing generates positive associations in heterozygosity (identity disequilibrium) between the modifier and the viability locus, even in the absence of linkage. The two kinds of associations together can compensate for initial reductions in mean offspring viability under meiotic reproduction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein H., Byerly H. C., Hopf F. A., Michod R. E. Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex. Science. 1985 Sep 20;229(4719):1277–1281. doi: 10.1126/science.3898363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein H., Byerly H. C., Hopf F. A., Michod R. E. Origin of sex. J Theor Biol. 1984 Oct 5;110(3):323–351. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlesworth B. The cost of sex in relation to mating system. J Theor Biol. 1980 Jun 21;84(4):655–671. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(80)80026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cockerham C. C., Weir B. S. Sib mating with two linked loci. Genetics. 1968 Nov;60(3):629–640. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.3.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eshel I., Feldman M. W. On the evolutionary effect of recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1970 May;1(1):88–100. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(70)90043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldman M. W., Christiansen F. B., Brooks L. D. Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4838–4841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HALDANE J. B. S. The association of characters as a result of inbreeding and linkage. Ann Eugen. 1949 Oct;15(1):15–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kondrashov A. S. Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. Genet Res. 1982 Dec;40(3):325–332. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300019194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pamilo P., Nei M., Li W. H. Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations. Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):135–146. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES