Abstract
Molecular genetics can be integrated with traditional methods of artificial selection on phenotypes by applying marker-assisted selection (MAS). We derive selection indices that maximize the rate of improvement in quantitative characters under different schemes of MAS combining information on molecular genetic polymorphisms (marker loci) with data on phenotypic variation among individuals (and their relatives). We also analyze statistical limitations on the efficiency of MAS, including the detectability of associations between marker loci and quantitative trait loci, and sampling errors in estimating the weighting coefficients in the selection index. The efficiency of artifical selection can be increased substantially using MAS following hybridization of selected lines. This requires initially scoring genotypes at a few hundred molecular marker loci, as well as phenotypic traits, on a few hundred to a few thousand individuals; the number of marker loci scored can be greatly reduced in later generations. The increase in selection efficiency from the use of marker loci, and the sample sizes necessary to achieve them, depend on the genetic parameters and the selection scheme.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics. 1965 Aug;52(2):349–363. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.2.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G. Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet Res. 1982 Dec;40(3):255–278. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300019145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):541–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.3-4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewontin R C. The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models. Genetics. 1964 Jan;49(1):49–67. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spickett S. G., Thoday J. M. Regular responses to selection. 3. Interaction between located polygenes. Genet Res. 1966 Feb;7(1):96–121. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300009502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sprague G. F., Russell W. A., Penny L. H. Mutations Affecting Quantitative Traits in the Selfed Progeny of Doubled Monoploid Maize Stocks. Genetics. 1960 Jul;45(7):855–866. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.7.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stuber C. W., Moll R. H., Goodman M. M., Schaffer H. E., Weir B. S. Allozyme Frequency Changes Associated with Selection for Increased Grain Yield in Maize (ZEA MAYS L.). Genetics. 1980 May;95(1):225–236. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.1.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson J. N., Jr Quantitative variation and gene number. Nature. 1975 Dec 25;258(5537):665–668. doi: 10.1038/258665a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weller J. I., Soller M., Brody T. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (lycopersicon esculentum x lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):329–339. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]