Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1990 Jul;125(3):551–555. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.3.551

Is There Selection on RFLP Differences in Mitochondrial Dna?

L Nigro 1, T Prout 1
PMCID: PMC1204082  PMID: 1974225

Abstract

Experimental populations of Drosophila simulans were established for the purpose of detecting the presence or absence of selection on a restriction fragment length polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). It was then discovered that the founding strains differed with respect to the Rickettsiamediated incompatibility system in this species, which is maternally transmitted together with the mtDNA differences. A population model was constructed using the known fitness effects of the incompatibility system, with the result that the population trajectories can be completely explained by the effects of the microorganism with no need to invoke selection on mtDNA. The strong conclusion is that in this case we can rule out the strong selection proposed by MacRae and Anderson to explain the ``dramatic mtDNA changes'' in their Drosophila pseudoobscura populations. The population theory used for the experiments is discussed in the context of natural populations. Estimated parameters include the possibility that with two populations, one with the organism and one without it, there may be no bias as to which will invade the other, which in turn suggests no global tendency for the infection to spread or decline.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (474.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coen E. S., Thoday J. M., Dover G. Rate of turnover of structural variants in the rDNA gene family of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1982 Feb 18;295(5850):564–568. doi: 10.1038/295564a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dobzhansky T. Genetic analysis of hybrid sterility within the species Drosophila pseudoobscura. Hereditas. 1974;77(1):81–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1974.tb01356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoffmann A. A., Turelli M. Unidirectional incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: inheritance, geographic variation and fitness effects. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):435–444. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MacRae A. F., Anderson W. W. Evidence for non-neutrality of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1988 Oct;120(2):485–494. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.2.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Prakash S. Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1972 Sep;72(1):143–155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES