Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1990 Jul;125(3):633–644. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.3.633

Mathematical Models of Gene Amplification with Applications to Cellular Drug Resistance and Tumorigenicity

M Kimmel 1, D E Axelrod 1
PMCID: PMC1204089  PMID: 2379824

Abstract

An increased number of copies of specific genes may offer an advantage to cells when they grow in restrictive conditions such as in the presence of toxic drugs, or in a tumor. Three mathematical models of gene amplification and deamplification are proposed to describe the kinetics of unstable phenotypes of cells with amplified genes. The models differ in details but all assume probabilistic mechanisms of increase and decrease in gene copy number per cell (gene amplification/deamplification). Analysis of the models indicates that a stable distribution of numbers of copies of genes per cell, observed experimentally, exists only if the probability of deamplification exceeds the probability of amplification. The models are fitted to published data on the loss of methotrexate resistance in cultured cell lines, due to the loss of amplified dihydrofolate reductase gene. For two mouse cell lines unstably resistant to methotrexate the probabilities of amplification and deamplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene on double minute chromosomes are estimated to be approximately 2% and 10%, respectively. These probabilities are much higher than widely presumed. The models explain the gradual disappearance of the resistant phenotype when selective pressure is withdrawn, by postulating that the rate of deamplification exceeds the rate of amplification. Thus it is not necessary to invoke a growth advantage of nonresistant cells which has been the standard explanation. For another analogous process, the loss of double minute chromosomes containing the myc oncogene from SEWA tumor cells, the growth advantage model does seem to be superior to the amplification and deamplification model. In a more theoretical section of the paper, it is demonstrated that gene amplification/deamplification can result in reduction to homozygosity, such as is observed in some tumors. Other applications are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austin S. J. Plasmid partition. Plasmid. 1988 Jul;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(88)90001-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown P. C., Beverley S. M., Schimke R. T. Relationship of amplified dihydrofolate reductase genes to double minute chromosomes in unstably resistant mouse fibroblast cell lines. Mol Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;1(12):1077–1083. doi: 10.1128/mcb.1.12.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown P. C., Tlsty T. D., Schimke R. T. Enhancement of methotrexate resistance and dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification by treatment of mouse 3T6 cells with hydroxyurea. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jun;3(6):1097–1107. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.6.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper N. S., Brown M. E., Caulcott C. A. A mathematical method for analysing plasmid stability in micro-organisms. J Gen Microbiol. 1987 Jul;133(7):1871–1880. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-7-1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Giulotto E., Knights C., Stark G. R. Hamster cells with increased rates of DNA amplification, a new phenotype. Cell. 1987 Mar 13;48(5):837–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90080-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haber D. A., Schimke R. T. Unstable amplification of an altered dihydrofolate reductase gene associated with double-minute chromosomes. Cell. 1981 Nov;26(3 Pt 1):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones R. B., Lumpkin C. K., Jr, Smith J. R. A stochastic model for cellular senescence. Part I. Theoretical considerations. J Theor Biol. 1980 Oct 7;86(3):581–592. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90354-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lenski R. E., Bouma J. E. Effects of segregation and selection on instability of plasmid pACYC184 in Escherichia coli B. J Bacteriol. 1987 Nov;169(11):5314–5316. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.11.5314-5316.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levan G., Mandahl N., Bengtsson B. O., Levan A. Experimental elimination and recovery of double minute chromosomes in malignant cell populations. Hereditas. 1977;86(1):75–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1977.tb01214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nordström K., Molin S., Light J. Control of replication of bacterial plasmids: genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of the plasmid R1 system. Plasmid. 1984 Sep;12(2):71–90. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(84)90054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Novick R. P., Hoppensteadt F. C. On plasmid incompatibility. Plasmid. 1978 Sep;1(4):421–434. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(78)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peterson J. A. Analysis of variability in albumin content of sister hepatoma cells and a model for geometric phenotypic variability (quantitative shift model). Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1984 Jul;10(4):345–357. doi: 10.1007/BF01535630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peterson J. A. The widespread nature of phenotypic variability in hepatomas and cell lines, in the form of a geometric series. J Theor Biol. 1983 May 7;102(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(83)90261-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ponder B. Cancer. Gene losses in human tumours. Nature. 1988 Sep 29;335(6189):400–402. doi: 10.1038/335400a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rath H., Tlsty T., Schimke R. T. Rapid emergence of methotrexate resistance in cultured mouse cells. Cancer Res. 1984 Aug;44(8):3303–3306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schimke R. T. Gene amplification in cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 5;263(13):5989–5992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schimke R. T. Gene amplification, drug resistance, and cancer. Cancer Res. 1984 May;44(5):1735–1742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schimke R. T., Sherwood S. W., Hill A. B., Johnston R. N. Overreplication and recombination of DNA in higher eukaryotes: potential consequences and biological implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(7):2157–2161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.7.2157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schwab M., Ramsay G., Alitalo K., Varmus H. E., Bishop J. M., Martinsson T., Levan G., Levan A. Amplification and enhanced expression of the c-myc oncogene in mouse SEWA tumour cells. Nature. 1985 May 23;315(6017):345–347. doi: 10.1038/315345a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Seneta E., Tavaré S. Some stochastic models for plasmid copy number. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):241–256. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith G. P. Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. Science. 1976 Feb 13;191(4227):528–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1251186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stark G. R., Debatisse M., Giulotto E., Wahl G. M. Recent progress in understanding mechanisms of mammalian DNA amplification. Cell. 1989 Jun 16;57(6):901–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90328-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tlsty T. D., Brown P. C., Schimke R. T. UV radiation facilitates methotrexate resistance and amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in cultured 3T6 mouse cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;4(6):1050–1056. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wahl G. M. The importance of circular DNA in mammalian gene amplification. Cancer Res. 1989 Mar 15;49(6):1333–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES