Abstract
In order to clarify the nature of ``near neutrality'' in molecular evolution and polymorphism, extensive simulation studies were performed. Selection coefficients of new mutations are assumed to be small so that both random genetic drift and selection contribute to determining the behavior of mutants. The model also incorporates normally distributed spatial fluctuation of selection coefficients. If the system starts from ``average neutrality,'' it will move to a better adapted state, and most new mutations will become ``slightly deleterious.'' Monte Carlo simulations have indicated that such adaptation is attained, but that the rate of such ``progress'' is very low for weak selection. In general, the larger the population size, the more effective the selection becomes. Also, as selection becomes weaker, the behavior of the mutants approaches that of completely neutral genes. Thus, the weaker the selection, the smaller is the effect of population size on mutant dynamics. Increase of heterozygosity with population size is very pronounced for subdivided populations. The significance of these results is discussed in relation to various observed facts on molecular evolution and polymorphism, such as generation-time dependency and overdispersion of the molecular clock, or contrasting patterns of DNA and protein polymorphism among some closely related species.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aquadro C. F., Lado K. M., Noon W. A. The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):875–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dean A. M., Dykhuizen D. E., Hartl D. L. Fitness effects of amino acid replacements in the beta-galactosidase of Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):469–485. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dykhuizen D., Hartl D. L. Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics. 1980 Dec;96(4):801–817. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman M., Moore G. W., Matsuda G. Darwinian evolution in the genealogy of haemoglobin. Nature. 1975 Feb 20;253(5493):603–608. doi: 10.1038/253603a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura M. Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3440–3444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohne D. E. Evolution of higher-organism DNA. Q Rev Biophys. 1970 Aug;3(3):327–375. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500004765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laird C. D., McConaughy B. L., McCarthy B. J. Rate of fixation of nucleotide substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1969 Oct 11;224(5215):149–154. doi: 10.1038/224149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langley C. H., Aquadro C. F. Restriction-map variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster: white-locus region. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Nov;4(6):651–663. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Molecular and phenotypic variation of the white locus region in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):199–212. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyata T., Hayashida H., Kuma K., Mitsuyasu K., Yasunaga T. Male-driven molecular evolution: a model and nucleotide sequence analysis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987;52:863–867. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1987.052.01.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mukai T., Yamaguchi O. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):339–366. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohta T. Population size and rate of evolution. J Mol Evol. 1972;1(3):305–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. doi: 10.1038/246096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohta T. Very slightly deleterious mutations and the molecular clock. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1-2):1–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02111276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sibley C. G., Ahlquist J. E. DNA hybridization evidence of hominoid phylogeny: results from an expanded data set. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1-2):99–121. doi: 10.1007/BF02111285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahata N. On the overdispersed molecular clock. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):169–179. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Z. B., Tachida H., Cockerham C. C. Effects of mutation on selection limits in finite populations with multiple alleles. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):977–984. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuckerkandl E. On the molecular evolutionary clock. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1-2):34–46. doi: 10.1007/BF02111280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]