Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1990 Sep;126(1):249–260. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.249

Detecting Isolation by Distance Using Phylogenies of Genes

M Slatkin 1, W P Maddison 1
PMCID: PMC1204129  PMID: 2227384

Abstract

We introduce a method for analyzing phylogenies of genes sampled from a geographically structured population. A parsimony method can be used to compute s, the minimum number of migration events between pairs of populations sampled, and the value of s can be used to estimate the effective migration rate M, the value of Nm in an island model with local populations of size N and a migration rate m that would yield the same value of s. Extensive simulations show that there is a simple relationship between M and the geographic distance between pairs of samples in one- and two-dimensional models of isolation by distance. Both stepping-stone and lattice models were simulated. If two demes k steps apart are sampled, then, s, the average value of s, is a function only of k/(Nm) in a one-dimensional model and is a function only of k/(Nm)(2) in a two-dimensional model. Furthermore, log(M) is approximately a linear function of log(k). In a one-dimensional model, the regression coefficient is approximately -1 and in a two-dimensional model the regression coefficient is approximately -0.5. Using data from several locations, the regression of log(M) on log(distance) may indicate whether there is isolation by distance in a population at equilibrium and may allow an estimate of the effective migration rate between adjacent sampling locations. Alternative methods for analyzing DNA sequence data from a geographically structured population are discussed. An application of our method to the data of R. L. Cann, M. Stoneking and A. C. Wilson on human mitochondrial DNA is presented.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cann R. L., Stoneking M., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature. 1987 Jan 1;325(6099):31–36. doi: 10.1038/325031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:521–565. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Maddison W. P., Maddison D. R. Interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution using the computer program MacClade. Folia Primatol (Basel) 1989;53(1-4):190–202. doi: 10.1159/000156416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Slatkin M., Maddison W. P. A cladistic measure of gene flow inferred from the phylogenies of alleles. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):603–613. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Slatkin M. The average number of sites separating DNA sequences drawn from a subdivided population. Theor Popul Biol. 1987 Aug;32(1):42–49. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(87)90038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Strobeck C. Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision. Genetics. 1987 Sep;117(1):149–153. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES