Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Jan;127(1):151–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.151

Four Distinct Regulatory Regions of the Cut Locus and Their Effect on Cell Type Specification in Drosophila

S Liu 1, E McLeod 1, J Jack 1
PMCID: PMC1204300  PMID: 2016040

Abstract

The cut gene in Drosophila is necessary in at least one cell type, the external sensory organs, for proper cell type specification and morphogenesis. It is also expressed in a variety of other tissues, where its function is less well characterized. Previous work has demonstrated that mutations affecting all the tissues map in the transcribed and translated portion of the gene, while mutations that are tissue specific in their effects map in the 140 kb upstream of the most 5' exon known. Within that 140 kb, the mutations fall into four subregions, two of which contain mutations affecting unique sets of tissues and the other two of which contain mutations that affect a third set. Our examination of the defects of mutants, their complementation behavior, and their effect on the distribution of the cut protein in embryos, alters the picture in three important ways. First, some mutations convert the cells of the Malpighian tubules into what appear to be gut cells, suggesting that cut is necessary for cell type specification and morphogenesis in a variety of tissues. Second, mutations in each of the four subregions in the 140 kb of upstream DNA cause a different set of phenotypes, suggesting that the regulatory region contains at least four separate units with different tissue specific functions. And third, mutations have now been identified that map in the transcribed and translated portion of the gene but that have tissue specific effects.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jack J., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):629–635. doi: 10.1038/333629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1322–1331. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodmer R., Barbel S., Sheperd S., Jack J. W., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):293–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Desplan C., Theis J., O'Farrell P. H. The Drosophila developmental gene, engrailed, encodes a sequence-specific DNA binding activity. Nature. 1985 Dec 19;318(6047):630–635. doi: 10.1038/318630a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duncan I. The bithorax complex. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:285–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jack J. W. Molecular organization of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):869–876. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson T. K., Judd B. H. Analysis of the Cut Locus of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):485–502. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krasnow M. A., Saffman E. E., Kornfeld K., Hogness D. S. Transcriptional activation and repression by Ultrabithorax proteins in cultured Drosophila cells. Cell. 1989 Jun 16;57(6):1031–1043. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lefevre G., Johnson T. K. Evidence for a Sex-Linked Haplo-Inviable Locus in the Cut-Singed Region of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1973 Aug;74(4):633–645. doi: 10.1093/genetics/74.4.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lim J. K., Simmons M. J., Raymond J. D., Cox N. M., Doll R. F., Culbert T. P. Homologue destabilization by a putative transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Nov;80(21):6624–6627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mitchison T. J., Sedat J. Localization of antigenic determinants in whole Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol. 1983 Sep;99(1):261–264. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90275-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomas J. B., Crews S. T., Goodman C. S. Molecular genetics of the single-minded locus: a gene involved in the development of the Drosophila nervous system. Cell. 1988 Jan 15;52(1):133–141. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90537-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Winslow G. M., Hayashi S., Krasnow M., Hogness D. S., Scott M. P. Transcriptional activation by the Antennapedia and fushi tarazu proteins in cultured Drosophila cells. Cell. 1989 Jun 16;57(6):1017–1030. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90340-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES