Abstract
Twenty generations of divergent selection for abdominal bristle number were carried out starting from a completely homozygous population of Drosophila melanogaster. All lines were selected with the same proportion (20%) but at two different numbers of selected parents of each sex (5 or 25). A significant response to selection was detected in eight lines (out of 40) and, in most cases, it could be wholly attributed to a single mutation of relatively large effect (0.5-2 phenotypic standard deviations). The ratio of new mutational variance to environmental variance was estimated to be (0.33 +/- 0.11) X 10(-3). The distribution of mutant effects was asymmetrical, both with respect to bristle number (85% of it was negative) and to fitness (most detected bristle mutations were lethal or semilethal). Moreover, this distribution was leptokurtic, due to the presence of major genes. Gene action on bristles ranged from additive to completely recessive, no epistatic interactions being found. In agreement with theory, larger responses in each direction were achieved by those lines selected at greater effective population sizes. Furthermore, the observed divergence between lines selected in opposite directions was proportional to their effective size, as predicted for mutations of large effect.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Frankham R., Jones L. P., Barker J. S. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 3. Analyses of the lines. Genet Res. 1968 Dec;12(3):267–283. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300011861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G., Rasbash J. Models of long-term artificial selection in finite population with recurrent mutation. Genet Res. 1986 Oct;48(2):125–131. doi: 10.1017/s001667230002485x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones L. P., Frankham R., Barker J. S. The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection. Genet Res. 1968 Dec;12(3):249–266. doi: 10.1017/s001667230001185x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Directional selection and variation in finite populations. Genetics. 1987 Nov;117(3):573–582. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Effects of linkage on response to directional selection from new mutations. Genet Res. 1983 Oct;42(2):193–206. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300021650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genet Res. 1988 Aug;52(1):33–43. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lai C. Q., Mackay T. F. Hybrid dysgenesis-induced quantitative variation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):627–636. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch M. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137–148. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mousseau T. A., Roff D. A. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Oct;59(Pt 2):181–197. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osman H. E., Robertson A. The introduction of genetic material from inferior into superior strains. Genet Res. 1968 Dec;12(3):221–236. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300011836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROBERTSON A. Selection in animals: synthesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:225–229. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roff D. A., Mousseau T. A. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Feb;58(Pt 1):103–118. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]