Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Aug;128(4):777–784. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.777

Identification of Nucleotide Substitutions Necessary for Trans-Activation of Mariner Transposable Elements in Drosophila: Analysis of Naturally Occurring Elements

K Maruyama 1, K D Schoor 1, D L Hartl 1
PMCID: PMC1204551  PMID: 1655567

Abstract

Six copies of the mariner element from the genomes of Drosophila mauritiana and Drosphila simulans were chosen at random for DNA sequencing and functional analysis and compared with the highly active element Mos1 and the inactive element peach. All elements were 1286 base pairs in length, but among them there were 18 nucleotide differences. As assayed in Drosophila melanogaster, three of the elements were apparently nonfunctional, two were marginally functional, and one had moderate activity that could be greatly increased depending on the position of the element in the genome. Both molecular (site-directed mutagenesis) and evolutionary (cladistic analysis) techniques were used to analyze the functional effects of nucleotide substitutions. The nucleotide sequence of the element is the primary determinant of function, though the activity level of elements is profoundly influenced by position effects. Cladistic analysis of the sequences has identified a T -> A transversion at position 1203 (resulting in a Phe -> Leu amino acid replacement in the putative transposase) as being primarily responsible for the low activity of the barely functional elements. Use of the sequences from the more distantly related species, Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila teissieri, as outside reference species, indicates that functional mariner elements are ancestral and argues against their origination by a novel mutation or by recombination among nonfunctional elements.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aquadro C. F., Desse S. F., Bland M. M., Langley C. H., Laurie-Ahlberg C. C. Molecular population genetics of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1165–1190. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.4.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan G., Garza D., Hartl D. Insertion and excision of the transposable element mariner in Drosophila. Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):103–114. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Capy P., Chakrani F., Lemeunier F., Hartl D. L., David J. R. Active mariner transposable elements are widespread in natural populations of Drosophila simulans. Proc Biol Sci. 1990 Oct 22;242(1303):57–60. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniels S. B., McCarron M., Love C., Clark S. H., Chovnick A. The underlying bases of gene expression differences in stable transformants of the rosy locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Jun;113(2):265–285. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.2.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DuBose R. F., Hartl D. L. An experimental approach to testing modular evolution: directed replacement of alpha-helices in a bacterial protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9966–9970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garza D., Medhora M., Koga A., Hartl D. L. Introduction of the transposable element mariner into the germline of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 Jun;128(2):303–310. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Helms C., Graham M. Y., Dutchik J. E., Olson M. V. A new method for purifying lambda DNA from phage lysates. DNA. 1985 Feb;4(1):39–49. doi: 10.1089/dna.1985.4.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacobson J. W., Medhora M. M., Hartl D. L. Molecular structure of a somatically unstable transposable element in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(22):8684–8688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karess R. E., Rubin G. M. Analysis of P transposable element functions in Drosophila. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):135–146. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90534-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maruyama K., Hartl D. L. Evolution of the transposable element mariner in Drosophila species. Genetics. 1991 Jun;128(2):319–329. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Medhora M. M., MacPeek A. H., Hartl D. L. Excision of the Drosophila transposable element mariner: identification and characterization of the Mos factor. EMBO J. 1988 Jul;7(7):2185–2189. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03057.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Misra S., Rio D. C. Cytotype control of Drosophila P element transposition: the 66 kd protein is a repressor of transposase activity. Cell. 1990 Jul 27;62(2):269–284. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90365-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Kane C. J., Gehring W. J. Detection in situ of genomic regulatory elements in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9123–9127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rasmusson K. E., Simmons M. J., Raymond J. D., McLarnon C. F. Quantitative effects of P elements on hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):647–662. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rubin G. M., Spradling A. C. Vectors for P element-mediated gene transfer in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Sep 24;11(18):6341–6351. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.18.6341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Templeton A. R., Boerwinkle E., Sing C. F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):343–351. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES