Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Sep;129(1):47–56. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.47

Mutants Affecting Processing of DNA in Macronuclear Development in Paramecium

B Rudman 1, L B Preer 1, B Polisky 1, J R Preer-Jr 1
PMCID: PMC1204580  PMID: 1936964

Abstract

In Paramecium tetraurelia, stock 51, the A surface protein is coded by the wild type A(51) gene, present in micronuclei in two copies and in macronuclei in about 1500 copies. DNA processing, comprised of DNA cleavage, copy number amplification and telomere addition occurs at autogamy and conjugation when old macronuclei degrade and new macronuclei are formed from micronuclei. In this paper we characterize mutants with macronuclear A gene deletions. These mutants are notable in three respects. First, the mutants do not appear to be simple micronuclear deletions. Although genetic analysis shows that the d12 mutant d12(-1300) is homozygous for the allele A(-1300) and the mutant d12(+1) for A(+1), analysis by the polymerase chain reaction indicates that the micronucIei in these two mutants contain intact, but presumably altered, micronuclear A genes. They undergo deletion during DNA processing when new macronuclei are formed. Second, the position of the deletions in these alleles has been shown to change. The deficiency present in the d12 allele A(-1300) was originally determined to extend from position -1300 (relative to the start of translation of the A gene) to the end of the chromosome. Later, a derivative of this strain, homozygous for the d12 allele A(+1) was isolated in which the start site of the deletion was found to have moved from -1300 to +1. Third, a surprising interaction occurs in crosses between a line homozygous for the d12 allele and one homozygous for the wild-type A(51) allele. Previous work on the non-Mendelian d48 mutant (which has intact A(51) genes in its micronucleus, but has truncated A(51) genes in its macronucleus) has shown that intact A(51) alleles must be present in the old macronucleus in order for A(51) alleles to undergo proper processing. We find that d12 alleles act on A(51) alleles in heterozygotes such that intact macronuclear A genes are no longer required for proper processing of A(51). Thus, in crosses of 51 X d12 (either +1 or -1300) d12 exconjugants, as well as 51 exconjugants, give rise to clones carrying both intact A(51) and truncated d12 alleles. Remarkably the d12 alleles, which are themselves deleted during processing, are capable in the heterozygote of fostering normal processing of the A(51) allele.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brygoo Y., Sonneborn T. M., Keller A. M., Dippell R. V., Schneller M. V. Genetic Analysis of Mating Type Differentiation in PARAMECIUM TETRAURELIA. II. Role of the Micronuclei in Mating-Type Determination. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):951–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doerder F. P., Berkowitz M. S. Nucleo-cytoplasmic interaction during macronuclear differentiation in ciliate protists: genetic basis for cytoplasmic control of SerH expression during macronuclear development in Tetrahymena thermophila. Genetics. 1987 Sep;117(1):13–23. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Epstein L. M., Forney J. D. Mendelian and non-mendelian mutations affecting surface antigen expression in Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1583–1590. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forney J. D., Blackburn E. H. Developmentally controlled telomere addition in wild-type and mutant paramecia. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jan;8(1):251–258. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.1.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forney J. D., Epstein L. M., Preer L. B., Rudman B. M., Widmayer D. J., Klein W. H., Preer J. R., Jr Structure and expression of genes for surface proteins in Paramecium. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Mar;3(3):466–474. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.3.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Godiska R., Aufderheide K. J., Gilley D., Hendrie P., Fitzwater T., Preer L. B., Polisky B., Preer J. R., Jr Transformation of Paramecium by microinjection of a cloned serotype gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(21):7590–7594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harumoto T. Induced change in a non-mendelian determinant by transplantation of macronucleoplasm in Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;6(10):3498–3501. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.10.3498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koizumi S., Kobayashi S. Microinjection of plasmid DNA encoding the A surface antigen of Paramecium tetraurelia restores the ability to regenerate a wild-type macronucleus. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4398–4401. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. You Y., Aufderheide K., Morand J., Rodkey K., Forney J. Macronuclear transformation with specific DNA fragments controls the content of the new macronuclear genome in Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):1133–1137. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES