Abstract
In humans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is well known as a prominent opportunistic pathogen associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which presents a major challenge to successful treatment. This is also the case in animals, particularly in companion dogs where P. aeruginosa is a common cause of otitis. Despite its clinical significance, little data are available on the genomics and epidemiology of P. aeruginosa in dogs. To address this, we have genome-sequenced 34 canine otitis P. aeruginosa isolates from a veterinary referral hospital and analysed these along with a further 62 publicly available genomes from canine isolates. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all three P. aeruginosa phylogroups, A–C, are represented amongst a diverse bacterial population isolated from dogs. We identify examples of persistent or recurrent infection by the same strain of up to 309 days between sampling, demonstrating the difficulty of successfully eradicating infection. Isolates encoded a variety of AMR genes with genomic and phenotypic AMR correlating poorly for β-lactams but showing complete concordance between fluoroquinolone resistance and quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Pangenome-wide analysis between 80 canine otitis isolates (34 newly sequenced here and a further 46 publicly available) and a reference collection of 491 human isolates found no genes which were over-represented or specific to either host species, indicating similar strains infect both humans and dogs. This agrees with the sharing of multilocus sequence types between dogs and humans, including the isolation here of ST235 from three dogs, a lineage prominent among the multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) international high-risk clones of P. aeruginosa causing human infections. The presence of such ‘high-risk' clones in companion dogs is concerning given their potential impact on animal health and the potential for zoonotic spread. These data provide new insight into this difficult-to-treat veterinary pathogen and promote the need for a One Health approach to tackling it.
Keywords: bacterial drug resistance, bacterial genome, canine, One Health, otitis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Impact Statement.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major human pathogen associated with antimicrobial resistance. This is also the case in small-animal medicine, particularly as a cause of intractable canine otitis. Little is known about the genomics and epidemiology of strains that cause canine infections, and this study presents an analysis of 34 newly sequenced P. aeruginosa isolates from canine otitis. These data are important for future surveillance, particularly for the monitoring of antimicrobial resistance, ‘high-risk’ clones and zoonotic infection. They also provide a basis to better understand disease pathogenesis, which can underpin the development of novel diagnostics and interventions. The recognition here that similar strains are infecting both humans and dogs emphasizes the need for a One Health approach in tackling P. aeruginosa.
Data Summary
The authors confirm that all supporting data, codes and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.
Introduction
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-stain-negative bacterium, found throughout the environment, is clinically significant as a common opportunistic pathogen in humans [1,4]. In particular, P. aeruginosa is an important pathogen among patients with cystic fibrosis, often causing chronic respiratory infections [3]. P. aeruginosa infections can be extremely difficult to treat as they are often resistant to conventional antimicrobials due to high intrinsic antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the ability to develop new resistance in response to antimicrobial treatment [5]. Indeed, P. aeruginosa is designated by the World Health Organisation as a ‘priority pathogen’ for the development of new antimicrobial agents [6] and is a member of the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.) comprising the most challenging multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogens [7]. In 2019, P. aeruginosa was estimated to be responsible for 43,801 deaths, of which 10,900 were attributable to AMR [8].
The challenges of P. aeruginosa infections and AMR are not limited to human medicine as this bacterium is able to cause a range of infections in other animals [9,11]. In companion dogs, it is a notable opportunistic pathogen, predominantly in otitis [12,14], but it is also associated with other conditions including pyoderma [15], ulcerative keratitis [16] and urinary tract infections [17]. In canine otitis, P. aeruginosa can be isolated from 28 to 37% of cases [18,20] and is especially prevalent in chronic and intractable cases [21,22]. In contrast, the bacterium is rarely present in healthy dog ears [21,23,25]. A large study of veterinary practice data in England reported otitis externa as the most frequent disorder in dogs, with a prevalence of 10.2% [26]. Canine otitis externa is known to have a significant negative impact on the welfare of both dogs [27] and owners [28,29], and the condition has been ranked as the second-most severe disorder in dogs by a primary veterinary care study [30].
Alongside Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa has been identified by the European Food Safety Authority Panel on Animal Health and Welfare as the most relevant AMR bacteria in the European Union [31]. Canine otitis caused by P. aeruginosa comprises a notable part of the One Health challenge posed by this opportunistic pathogen, necessitating considerable antimicrobial use and presenting a zoonotic risk, in addition to animal welfare concerns raised. While P. aeruginosa from human infections are well studied, there is little literature available on the molecular epidemiology and genomics of P. aeruginosa isolates from canine infections. We have, therefore, investigated the population structure, AMR and relationship to human isolates of P. aeruginosa from canine otitis from a veterinary referral hospital in the UK.
Methods
Isolate collection and whole-genome sequencing
Canine otitis samples from referral patients at the Hospital for Small Animals, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), University of Edinburgh were cultured on Columbia blood agar with 5% (v/v) horse blood (E and O Laboratories Ltd.) by the Easter Bush Pathology microbiology laboratory as part of their routine diagnostic service. Isolates were identified using Vitek2™ (bioMérieux) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. For this study, all 34 otitis isolates identified as P. aeruginosa between 01 July 2017 and 31 October 2022 were genome sequenced. Whole-genome sequencing was performed by Microbes NG (University of Birmingham, UK) as described previously [32]. Contigs<200 bp were removed manually, and contaminant sequences were removed automatically during upload to NCBI via the NCBI Foreign Contamination Screen [33]. CheckM analysis (v1.2.2) was also performed during upload to NCBI to assess genome assembly quality with respect to percentage completeness and contamination [34]. Taxonomy was confirmed during upload to NCBI using average nucleotide identity (ANI) [35] and independently by digital DNA:DNA hybridization via the Type Strain Genome Server [36]. Strain metadata and accession are presented in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article).
Phylogenetic and pangenome analyses
Quality control and inclusion of additional P. aeruginosa genomes
Sixty-two additional canine P. aeruginosa genomes were downloaded from the NCBI assembly database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly; National Centre for Biotechnology Information, Maryland, USA) (Table S2). Genomes were included if the biosample entry or an associated paper contained the following associated data: host species, country of isolation and sample type or host disease.
The quality of the P. aeruginosa genome assemblies was assessed using QUAST v5.2.0 [37], and the output was compiled with multiQC v1.13 [38]. Draft genome assemblies were annotated using Prokka v1.14.6 with default parameters [39]. As a further measure of quality control, the whole-genome average nucleotide identity was calculated for all-v-all genome assemblies with fastANI v1.33 [40] to identify any genome assemblies that may contain contaminant sequences based on a threshold of ≥95 % ANI for delineating species [41].
Alignment and phylogenetic analysis
The Snippy v4.6 pipeline (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) was used to perform variant calling and produce core genome alignments of the P. aeruginosa isolates against reference genomes PA01 (accession GCF_000006765.1_ASM676v1) and PA14 (accession GCF_000014625.1_ASM1462v1). Additionally, a pangenome analysis was carried out for the canine P. aeruginosa genomes and reference genomes PAO1 and PA14 with PIRATE (Pangenome Iterative Refinement and Threshold Evaluation) v1.0.5 [42], using default parameters as follows: CoDing Sequence (CDS) used as feature pangenome construction, paralog classification enabled and identity thresholds used for pangenome construction 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95 and 98%. The core genome was defined as CDS present in ≥95% of genomes, and accessory CDS as those present in <95 % but at least one genome. Using the core genome alignments produced against reference genomes PAO1 and PA14 and the core gene alignment produced with PIRATE, maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were inferred with IQtree v2.2.2.3 [43], using the general time reversible (GTR) substitution model and 1,000 UltraFast bootstraps [44]. Phylogenetic trees were visualized, annotated and rooted with iTOL v5 [45].
Pangenome-wide-association analysis
Further pangenome analysis was carried out with PIRATE v1.0.5 [42], using default parameters as outlined above, to include P. aeruginosa isolates from human infections, alongside 80 canine isolates obtained from otitis cases (34 newly sequenced and 46 from NCBI). The genomes of 491 human P. aeruginosa isolates were downloaded and included in the subsequent pangenomic analysis (all canine and human isolates in the analysis are presented in Table S3). These isolates comprised PA01, all 103 UK human isolates available from the International Pseudomonas Consortium Database ((https://ipcd.ibis.ulaval.ca/index) when accessed on 15 November 2023) [46] and 387 isolates from an international dataset (BioProject PRJNA264310) [47]. That latter dataset consisted of 390 isolates in the original publication [47], but NCBI filtered out three entries that did not have the requested ReleaseType or were suppressed. A pangenome-wide gene association analysis was carried out with Scoary v1.6.16 [48], to identify genes over-represented or specific to either of the host species (human or canine), using the gene presence–absence matrix output from PIRATE as the input for Scoary.
Genome analysis for MLST, AMR genes and bacteriocin genes
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on genome sequences using PathogenWatch (https://pathogen.watch/) [49], and two novel sequence types (STs) were allocated via genome submission to https://pubmlst.org/ [50]. Abricate v1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) was used to screen for AMR genes utilizing the CARD database [51,52] (database versions from 27 March 2021) with genes being identified using thresholds of ≥80 % nucleotide sequence identity and ≥80 % query sequence coverage. AMR gene presence and absence was aligned to the study isolate bacterial phylogeny using ggTree v3.10.0 [53] in RStudio v4.3.2 [54]. Bacteriocin genes encoded in the 34 UK study isolates were identified using BAGEL4 [55].
Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using disc diffusion following the 2023 European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines [56] and breakpoints [57]. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used for routine quality control, and Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were included for control of the inhibitor component of β-lactam–inhibitor combinations [58]. All control isolates produced zones of inhibition within the acceptable ranges [58]. The antimicrobials tested are presented in Table S4. AMR phenotypic and genomic concordance/discordance was determined by comparing genomic data (i.e. presence or absence of AMR genes/mutations) with phenotypic disc diffusion testing data for the 34 R(D)SVS P. aeruginosa isolates against 10 antimicrobials (n=340 combinations) as described previously [59], with full results presented in Table S5.
Results and discussion
MLST and phylogenetic analysis of canine otitis P. aeruginosa
Thirty-four otitis isolates of P. aeruginosa cultured from canine ear swabs and fluid at the R(D)SVS were genome sequenced using Illumina technology. Their genome varied in length from 6.26 Mp to 7.00 Mp with a mean of 6.58 Mp (Table S1), consistent with previously reported genome lengths of P. aeruginosa isolated from clinical and environmental settings [60].
Twenty-five STs were represented among the 34 canine isolates (Table S1). These came from 30 individual dogs, with four dogs providing two isolates, three dogs providing one isolate from two sampling time points, and a fourth dog with isolates being collected at the same time but from different ears. In each of these four cases, the same ST was found in both isolates; thus, 25 STs were isolates from 30 individual dogs. The most frequent of those being ST27 and ST235 (three isolates each), another five STs were found in two isolates, while the remaining 19 STs were found in single isolates. Two new STs were found: ST4532 in isolate 234181_R, which comprised a novel combination of previously recognized alleles and ST1244, a previously assigned ST, with no corresponding isolate representing it. Previous work has isolated a range of P. aeruginosa STs from dogs, and our study provides agreement that diverse isolates are responsible for canine infections [10,61]. The isolation of ST235 from three individual dogs is noteworthy, given that this lineage is among the MDR/XDR international high-risk clones of P. aeruginosa causing human infections [62,63]. Albeit two of the three study isolates were pan-susceptible to the antimicrobials tested here, with the third one resistant only to certain β-lactams. It is the only example of a high-risk clone among the canine study isolates here, although the high-risk clones, ST111, ST233 and ST244, have also been isolated from dogs [64,65]. ST235 has a wide-ranging international distribution in human disease and is not only associated with AMR but also with increased virulence and mortality in human patients [66,69]. The ExoU cytotoxin encoded by ST235 likely contributes to this increased virulence [70,71], and all three canine study isolates were exoU-positive. The presence of ST235 and other high-risk clones in companion animals should be closely monitored given the risk that they may pose to the animals and owners alike. An analysis of the P. aeruginosa PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/pseudomonas-aeruginosa accessed 24.03.25) [50] reveals that 20 out of the 25 STs identified among study isolates have been previously found in human disease, supporting the suggestion that similar P. aeruginosa strains can cause infections in both humans and dogs. Of the remaining five STs, two are new from this study and have not yet been reported from elsewhere. The three others, ST2459, ST2460 and ST3690, have only been isolated from dogs, but in each case, only a single isolate is documented on the PubMLST database. Therefore, any association between these STs and dogs will require the isolation of further isolates.
A mid-point rooted phylogeny of canine P. aeruginosa isolates was constructed from core genome SNPs derived from the pangenome of all isolates included in the phylogeny (Fig. 1). This approach was used to avoid any potential bias caused by the use of a single reference strain for SNP analysis. Although phylogenies were also produced using either PA01 or PA14, which produced similar results (data not shown). A further 62 canine P. aeruginosa genomes available from the NCBI assembly database were included for comparison with R(D)SVS isolates (Table S2). These came from Estonia (42 isolates), France (7 isolates), USA (5 isolates), Brazil (3 isolates), Japan (3 isolates) and Germany and South Korea (one isolate each). The majority of these additional canine isolates came from auricular sites (77%, 44/62), and the other isolates came from a variety of sites, most predominately from skin/wound (eight isolates). This phylogeny indicated a diverse population of canine isolates with a mean pairwise SNP distance of 49,536 between UK study isolates and 41,294 between all 96 canine P. aeruginosa isolates (with PA01 and PA14 reference strains removed from pairwise calculations) (Table S6). The lower average value for the whole collection reflects the inclusion of several highly related isolates among those sequenced from Estonia.
Fig. 1. Mid-point rooted phylogeny of canine P. aeruginosa isolates constructed from core genome SNPs derived from the pangenome of all isolates included in the phylogeny; coloured bar indicates country of origin. Boxed isolates, A–H, indicate closely related isolates, where at least one of those isolates is from this study. Clades most closely related to either PA01 (phylogroup 1) or PA14 (phylogroup 2) reference strains are indicated by bold and dashed branches, respectively. For orientation, PA01 and PA14 are indicated by blue and red arrows, respectively. The presence and absence of exoU and exoS are indicated by filled and empty symbols, respectively. Most isolates from the R(D)SVS came from individual dogs, the exceptions being four separate animals providing two isolates each. In these cases, the pair of isolates was closely related, and the boxes C, E, G and H are indicated by an asterisk. Further isolate details are provided in Tables S1 and S2.
The P. aeruginosa population has previously been classified into three phylogroups: A containing reference strain PAO1, B containing PA14 and a third minor group, C [47,72, 73]. Phylogroups A and B are further distinguished by the distribution of exoU and exoS, which encode effector proteins secreted by the P. aeruginosa type III secretion system. exoS is highly overrepresented in phylogroup A compared with phylogroup B, and exoU, conversely, is highly overrepresented in phylogroup B compared with phylogroup A [73]. The majority of canine isolates (75/96) were more closely related to PA01 than to PA14, indicating that most isolates belong to the P. aeruginosa phylogenetic group A. Fifteen other canine isolates were more closely related to PA14 and, therefore, likely represented phylogenetic group B. Consistent with this assignment to phylogenetic groups was the distribution of exoU and exoS (Fig. 1). exoU, indicative of phylogenetic group B, was present in 13 out of 15 canine isolates that are more closely related to PA14 and only present in 3 of the other 81 isolates. Conversely, exoS was absent in all 15 of those PA14-related isolates but was present in 74 of 75 PA01-related isolates. A further six canine isolates, including three from R(D)SVS, did not appear to be closely related to either reference strain and likely represent phylogenetic group C isolates.
There were several examples of closely related isolates involving R(D)SVS study isolates (Fig. 1 Boxes A-H). In four of these cases, the two related isolates came from the same individual dog (Fig. 1 Boxes C, E, G and H). Isolates 234179_P and 234180_Q came from different ears from the same dog on the same day and are separated by 47 SNPs (Fig. 1 Box C). Isolates 234193_AD and 234195_AF came from another individual dog 96 days apart and are separated by 193 SNPs (Fig. 1 Box G). Isolates 234178_O and 234183_T are also from another individual animal and separated by 53 SNPs but were isolated 169 days apart from the same ear (Fig. 1 Box H). 234188_Y and 234192_AC (Fig. 1 Box E) were isolated from another individual 309 days apart and are separated by 11 SNPs. These last three examples illustrate the difficulty in successfully clearing P. aeruginosa otitis infections and confirm the persistence of the same strain during chronic or recurrent infection.
Closely related UK isolates were not restricted to the examples of isolates collected from the same individual dogs. Among the 34 UK isolates, there are two examples of closely related isolates (Boxes D and F, Fig. 1) cultured from different dogs. Isolates 234168_E, 234173_J and 234174_K (Box D, Fig. 1) came from three different dogs, with the latter two isolates separated by 60 SNPs, whereas isolate 234168_E was more distinct with an SNP distance of 417–477 from those other two. These are notable as being the three isolates belonging to ST235. Isolates 234186_W and 234187_X (Box F, Fig. 1), also from different dogs, were collected 75 days apart and were separated by ten SNPs. While epidemiological links between these animals have not been established, the closely related strains may indicate potential common sources or transmission events that, if detected in near real time, would merit further surveillance and investigation.
There are also two examples of UK study strains closely related to isolates from other countries. 234165_B was separated by 413 and 419 SNPs from two Estonian isolates (Fig. 1 Box A), while isolate 234184_U was 262 and 486 SNPs from Estonian and South Korean isolates, respectively (Fig. 1 Box B). While there is insufficient metadata to consider any potential epidemiological links of these related isolates, it does suggest that there are instances of international dissemination of clones causing canine otitis.
Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial susceptibility
Nineteen out of 34 isolates (55.9%) were susceptible to all ten tested antimicrobials with 15 (44.1%) showing resistance to at least one (Table S4). Resistance was most frequent against the quinolones: ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Twelve isolates (35.3%) were resistant to both of these antimicrobials, with all other isolates being susceptible to both. No isolates were classed as multidrug resistant, i.e. acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories. Although seven isolates showed acquired resistance to two antimicrobial categories. Five isolates (14.7%) were resistant to aztreonam and three (8.8%) were resistant to cefepime. Two isolates (5.9%) were resistant to both aminoglycosides tested, amikacin and tobramycin, and a single isolate (2.9%) was resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam. No resistance was seen for the two carbapenems, meropenem and doripenem, nor the cephalosporin ceftazidime.
Using RGI/CARD (Resistance Gene Identifier/Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database), a total of 57 unique genes associated with AMR were identified among the 34 study isolates (Fig. 2). The number of such genes in individual isolates ranged from 41 to 47. A majority of these genes (36/57, 63.2%) were present in all isolates regardless of differences in phenotypic resistance. For the tested β-lactams, there was a poor concordance (3.92%) between resistance genotype and phenotype (Table S5). Concordance between genotype and phenotype improved to 88.24 % for aminoglycoside sensitivity testing, but most isolates (30/34) were sensitive and lacked resistance genes, while in a few instances of phenotypic (n=2) or genotypic (n=2) resistance, there was complete discordance. Thus, further testing with a wider range of phenotypes and genotypes, and combinations thereof, would be required to confidently ascertain the concordance between genotype and phenotype in the case of aminoglycosides. Discordance between AMR genes and AMR phenotype in P. aeruginosa has been reported in previous studies on human clinical isolates [59,74, 75] and is apparent in canine isolates also, particularly for β-lactams. The difficulty in predicting AMR phenotype from genome sequences in P. aeruginosa has been ascribed to mutations altering expression levels of efflux pumps, outer membrane proteins and intrinsic β-lactamases [76]. Some disagreement may also arise from inaccuracies in phenotypic testing. In contrast to acquired AMR genes, there was a complete concordance between resistance to quinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin tested here) and mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Most strikingly, all 12 resistance isolates had the Thr-83-Ile mutation in DNA gyrase subunit A, encoded by gyrA, while all sensitive isolates had the wild-type residue at this position. The resistant isolates 234171_H and 234193_AD also had a Ser-87-Leu mutation in the A subunit of topoisomerase IV, encoded by parC, which was absent in all other isolates. These are two of the most frequently observed mutations linked to quinolone resistance in human clinical P. aeruginosa isolates and those exposed to quinolones in the laboratory and have been demonstrated to decrease the binding affinity of quinolones to these targets of action [77,78]. The presence of QRDR mutations in both DNA gyrase subunit A and topoisomerase IV increases quinolone resistance compared to mutation of either protein singly [79]. Only one mutation in the QRDR of DNA gyrase subunit B (amino acid positions 429 to 585), encoded by gyrB, was present, an E468D mutation in the resistant isolate 234171_H. Two mutations were noted in the QRDR of topoisomerase IV subunit B (amino acid positions 357 to 503), encoded by parE. A I436L in the resistant isolate 234197_AH and V460G in susceptible isolate 234177_N.
Fig. 2. Predicted antimicrobial resistance and bacteriocin genes among 34 study P. aeruginosa otitis externa isolates and PA01 and PA14 (reference strains). Pairs of isolates from the same individual animals possessed the same gene profile. Gene presence (dark blue) and absence (light blue) was visualized using ggTree v3.10.0 in RStudio v4.3.2.
Bacteriocin gene content
P. aeruginosa is known to encode a range of bacteriocins (pyocins), small ribosomally encoded peptides with antibacterial activity against other strains or species which are often closely related to the producer [80]. Bacteriocins are purported to provide an ecological advantage against competitors in addition to being of interest as novel antibacterials [81,82]. How they influence P. aeruginosa disease pathogenesis in the canine host remains unclear, but they could antagonize the normal microflora in the ear and skin and facilitate colonization and subsequent infection. The majority (29/34, 85.3%) of UK study isolates encoded at least one bacteriocin gene, with two of those predicted to have two such genes (Fig. 2). Five isolates were predicted not to encode a bacteriocin. Four different bacteriocins were detected, all belonging to the S-type pyocins, S2, S1, AP41 and PaeM, with pyocin S2 the most frequent, being found in half of the 34 isolates (Fig. 2).
Pangenome-wide-association analysis
Host specificity or adaptation of canine and human isolates was examined by pangenome-wide-association analysis to identify genes associated with either host species. This analysis, comprising 80 canine (specifically those from otitis) and 491 human isolates, did not identify any such genes, indicating a lack of host adaptation or specificity in the strains infecting humans and dogs (Tables S37 and 8). This agrees with the same STs being present among human and canine isolates and the recent finding of there being no specific virulence profile associated with canine otitis infection when comparing isolates from human and environmental sources by hierarchical clustering [64]. Further supporting a lack of host specificity among human and canine isolates is the case report of zooanthroponotic transmission between owner and dog of a carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa [65].
Conclusion
Infections caused by P. aeruginosa are a major challenge in human and veterinary medicine. To address the scarcity of genomic-level insight into the epidemiology of canine P. aeruginosa, we have analysed 34 newly sequenced isolates from otitis. This information is valuable in better understanding the pathogenesis of these infections, the design of diagnostics and therapeutics and for the surveillance of a key AMR pathogen. The finding that similar strains infect both human and canine hosts emphasizes the need for a One Health approach when considering P. aeruginosa epidemiology and interventions.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The excellent technician assistance of Jennifer Harris, Easter Bush Pathology, University of Edinburgh, is gratefully acknowledged. Genome sequencing was provided by MicrobesNG (http://www.microbesng.com). This publication made use of the PubMLST website (https://pubmlst.org/) developed by Keith Jolley (Jolley et al. Wellcome Open Res 2018, 3 : 124 [version 1; referees: 2 approved]) and sited at the University of Oxford. The development of that website was funded by the Wellcome Trust.
Abbreviations
- AMR
antimicrobial resistance
- CDS
CoDing sequence
- ESKAPE
Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.
- MDR
multidrug resistant
- PIRATE
pangenome iterative refinement and threshold evaluation
- QRDR
quinolone resistance-determining region
- R(D)SVS
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies
- RGI/CARD
resistance gene identifier/comprehensive antibiotic resistance database
- XDR
extensively drug-resistant
Footnotes
Funding: This work received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Ethical statement: Ethical approval for the study of bacterial isolates collected at Easter Bush Pathology was granted by the Veterinary Ethical Review Committee of The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (reference no. 28.21).
Accession No.: The new draft genome sequences and sequence reads generated in the study are available under BioProject PRJNA1063700.
Contributor Information
L. Newstead, Email: L.Newstead@sms.ed.ac.uk.
T. Smith-Zaitlik, Email: t.a.smith-zaitlik@sms.ed.ac.uk.
E. Roberts, Email: e.a.roberts@sms.ed.ac.uk.
S. Street, Email: shannonstreet@outlook.com.
G.K. Paterson, Email: gavin.paterson@ed.ac.uk.
References
- 1.Hoiby N, Johansen HK, Moser C, Ciofu O. In: Pseudomonas: Model Organism, Pathogen, Cell Factory 2008. Rehm BHA, editor. Clinical Relevance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Master of Adaptation and Survival Strategies; pp. 25–44. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: a paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:39. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nickerson R, Thornton CS, Johnston B, Lee AHY, Cheng Z. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic lung disease: untangling the dysregulated host immune response. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1405376. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1405376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lyczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB. Establishment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist. Microbes Infect. 2000;2:1051–1060. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)01259-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Langendonk RF, Neill DR, Fothergill JL. The building blocks of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: implications for current resistance-breaking therapies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.665759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Organisation WH WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Geneva. 2024 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mestrovic T, Robles Aguilar G, Swetschinski LR, Ikuta KS, Gray AP, et al. The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO European region in 2019: a cross-country systematic analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e897–e913. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00225-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pottier M, Castagnet S, Gravey F, Leduc G, Sévin C, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from equine and other veterinary samples. Pathogens. 2022;12:64. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elfadadny A, Uchiyama J, Goto K, Imanishi I, Ragab RF, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the ear canals of dogs in Japan. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1074127. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1074127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mahmoud SF, Fayez M, Swelum AA, Alswat AS, Alkafafy M, et al. Genetic diversity, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cow, camel, and mare with clinical endometritis. Vet Sci. 2022;9:239. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barnard N, Foster A. How to treat Pseudomonas otitis in dogs. Vet Rec. 2018;182:109–110. doi: 10.1136/vr.k413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pye C. Pseudomonas otitis externa in dogs. Can Vet J. 2018;59:1231–1234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Secker B, Shaw S, Atterbury RJ. Pseudomonas spp. in canine otitis externa. Microorganisms. 2023;11:2650. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hillier A, Griffin CE. The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (I): incidence and prevalence. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2001;81:147–151. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(01)00296-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goss R, Adams VJ, Heinrich C, Grundon R, Linn-Pearl R, et al. Progressive ulcerative keratitis in dogs in the United Kingdom: microbial isolates, antimicrobial sensitivity, and resistance patterns. Vet Ophthalmol. 2023 doi: 10.1111/vop.13160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hall JL, Holmes MA, Baines SJ. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of canine urinary tract pathogens. Vet Rec. 2013;173:549. doi: 10.1136/vr.101482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cole LK, Kwochka KW, Kowalski JJ, Hillier A. Microbial flora and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of isolated pathogens from the horizontal ear canal and middle ear in dogs with otitis media. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998;212:534–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Colombini S, Merchant SR, Hosgood G. Microbial flora and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from dogs with otitis media. Vet Dermatol. 2000;11:235–239. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.2000.00191.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Petersen AD, Walker RD, Bowman MM, Schott HC, II, Rosser EJ Jr. Frequency of isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus intermedius and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from canine skin and ear samples over a 6-year period (1992–1997) J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2002;38:407–413. doi: 10.5326/0380407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Miller WG, Campbell KL. Muller and Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. 7th. St. Louis: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013. Diseases of the eyelids, claws, anal sacs and ears. edn. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martín Barrasa JL, Lupiola Gómez P, González Lama Z, Tejedor Junco MT. Antibacterial susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas strains isolated from chronic canine otitis externa. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2000;47:191–196. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barnard N, Foster A. Pseudomonas otitis in dogs: a general practitioner’s guide to treatment. In Practice. 2017;39:386–398. doi: 10.1136/inp.j892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Korbelik J, Singh A, Rousseau J, Weese JS. Characterization of the otic bacterial microbiota in dogs with otitis externa compared to healthy individuals. Vet Dermatol. 2019;30:228–e70. doi: 10.1111/vde.12734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bradley CW, Lee FF, Rankin SC, Kalan LR, Horwinski J, et al. The otic microbiota and mycobiota in a referral population of dogs in eastern USA with otitis externa. Vet Dermatol. 2020;31:225–e49. doi: 10.1111/vde.12826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.O Neill DG, Church DB, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Brodbelt DC. Prevalence of disorders recorded in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in England. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.O’Neill DG, Volk AV, Soares T, Church DB, Brodbelt DC, et al. Frequency and predisposing factors for canine otitis externa in the UK - a primary veterinary care epidemiological view. Canine Med Genet . 2021;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s40575-021-00106-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nuttall T. Managing recurrent otitis externa in dogs: what have we learned and what can we do better? J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023;261:S10–S22. doi: 10.2460/javma.23.01.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.King SB, Doucette KP, Seewald W, Forster SL. A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter evaluation of the efficacy and safety of A once weekly two dose otic gel containing florfenicol, terbinafine and betamethasone administered for the treatment of canine otitis externa. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:307. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1627-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Summers JF, O’Neill DG, Church D, Collins L, Sargan D, et al. Health-related welfare prioritisation of canine disorders using electronic health records in primary care practice in the UK. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15:163. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1902-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nielsen SS, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, et al. Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: dogs and cats. EFS2 . 2021;19:e06680. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Foster G, Robb A, Paterson GK. Isolation and genome sequencing of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans from Antarctic and North Sea seals. Access Microbiol . 2020;2:acmi000162. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Astashyn A, Tvedte ES, Sweeney D, Sapojnikov V, Bouk N, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of genome contamination at scale with FCS-GX. Genome Biol. 2024;25:60. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03198-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K, et al. Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:2386–2392. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bayliss SC, Thorpe HA, Coyle NM, Sheppard SK, Feil EJ. PIRATE: a fast and scalable pangenomics toolbox for clustering diverged orthologues in bacteria. Gigascience. 2019;8:giz119. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic Era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Freschi L, Jeukens J, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Boyle B, Dupont M-J, et al. Clinical utilization of genomics data produced by the international pseudomonas aeruginosa consortium. Front Microbiol. 2015 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kos VN, Déraspe M, McLaughlin RE, Whiteaker JD, Roy PH, et al. The resistome of pseudomonas aeruginosa in relationship to phenotypic susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:427–436. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03954-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brynildsrud O, Bohlin J, Scheffer L, Eldholm V. Rapid scoring of genes in microbial pan-genome-wide association studies with Scoary. Genome Biol. 2016;17:238. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1108-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Argimón S, Yeats CA, Goater RJ, Abudahab K, Taylor B, et al. A global resource for genomic predictions of antimicrobial resistance and surveillance of salmonella typhi at pathogenwatch. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2879. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23091-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, et al. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam T-Y. Ggtree: an r package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:28–36. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R: Postit Software, PBC. 2023. https://posit.co/
- 55.van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, et al. BAGEL4: a user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Matuschek E, Brown DFJ, Kahlmeter G. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O255–66. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Breakpoint tables for interpretation of mics and zone diameters. Version 13.1 2023 [Google Scholar]
- 58.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Routine and extended internal quality control for MIC determination and disk diffusion as recommended by EUCAST. Version 13.2. 2023 [Google Scholar]
- 59.Eladawy M, Thomas JC, Hoyles L. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from catheter-associated urinary tract infections in an Egyptian hospital. Microb Genom. 2023;9:001125. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Weiser R, Green AE, Bull MJ, Cunningham-Oakes E, Jolley KA, et al. Not all Pseudomonas aeruginosa are equal: strains from industrial sources possess uniquely large multireplicon genomes. Microb Genom. 2019;5:e000276. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hyun JE, Chung TH, Hwang CY. Identification of VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from dogs with pyoderma and otitis in Korea. Vet Dermatol. 2018;29:186–e68. doi: 10.1111/vde.12534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Oliver A, Mulet X, López-Causapé C, Juan C. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist Updat. 2015;21–22:41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Del Barrio-Tofiño E, López-Causapé C, Oliver A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56:106196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Secker B, Shaw S, Hobley L, Atterbury RJ. Genomic and phenotypic characterisation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from canine otitis externa reveals high-risk sequence types identical to those found in human nosocomial infections. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1526843. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1526843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fernandes MR, Sellera FP, Moura Q, Carvalho MPN, Rosato PN, et al. Zooanthroponotic transmission of drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis . 2018;24:1160–1162. doi: 10.3201/eid2406.180335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sánchez-Diener I, Zamorano L, Peña C, Ocampo-Sosa A, Cabot G, et al. Weighting the impact of virulence on the outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sánchez-Diener I, Zamorano L, López-Causapé C, Cabot G, Mulet X, et al. Interplay among resistance profiles, high-risk clones, and virulence in the caenorhabditis elegans Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:01586–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01586-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gómez-Zorrilla S, Juan C, Cabot G, Camoez M, Tubau F, et al. Impact of multidrug resistance on the pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;47:368–374. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Recio R, Villa J, Viedma E, Orellana MÁ, Lora-Tamayo J, et al. Bacteraemia due to extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequence type 235 high-risk clone: facing the perfect storm. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52:172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Peña C, Cabot G, Gómez-Zorrilla S, Zamorano L, Ocampo-Sosa A, et al. Influence of virulence genotype and resistance profile in the mortality of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:539–548. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Engel J, Balachandran P. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III effectors in disease. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Freschi L, Jeukens J, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Boyle B, Dupont M-J, et al. Clinical utilization of genomics data produced by the international Pseudomonas aeruginosa consortium. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1036. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ozer EA, Nnah E, Didelot X, Whitaker RJ, Hauser AR. The population structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is characterized by genetic isolation of exoU+ and exoS+ lineages. Genome Biol Evol. 2019;11:1780–1796. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rebelo AR, Bortolaia V, Leekitcharoenphon P, Hansen DS, Nielsen HL, et al. One day in denmark: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing in bacterial isolates from clinical settings. Front Microbiol. 2022 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.804627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ku PM, Hobbs DA, Gilmore M, Hobbs AL. 1234. Can susceptibility to one carbapenem be conferred to another? frequency of discordance in gram-negative clinical Isolates. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8:S706–S707. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ellington MJ, Ekelund O, Aarestrup FM, Canton R, Doumith M, et al. The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23:2–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Laborda P, Hernando-Amado S, Martínez JL, Sanz-García F. In: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Biology, Pathogenesis and Control Strategies. Filloux A, Ramos J-L, editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas; pp. 117–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Langendonk RF, Neill DR, Fothergill JL. The building blocks of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: implications for current resistance-breaking therapies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:665759. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.665759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pasca MR, Dalla Valle C, De Jesus Lopes Ribeiro AL, Buroni S, Papaleo MC, et al. Evaluation of fluoroquinolone resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug resistance clinical isolates. Microb Drug Resist. 2012;18:23–32. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2011.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ghequire MGK, De Mot R. Ribosomally encoded antibacterial proteins and peptides from Pseudomonas. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:523–568. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Newstead LL, Varjonen K, Nuttall T, Paterson GK. Staphylococcal-produced bacteriocins and antimicrobial peptides: their potential as alternative treatments for Staphylococcus aureus infections. Antibiotics. 2020;9:40. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sugrue I, Ross RP, Hill C. Bacteriocin diversity, function, discovery and application as antimicrobials. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024;22:556–571. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01045-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


