Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Dec;129(4):1061–1072. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1061

Identification of Grandchildless Loci Whose Products Are Required for Normal Germ-Line Development in the Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans

E E Capowski 1, P Martin 1, C Garvin 1, S Strome 1
PMCID: PMC1204771  PMID: 1783292

Abstract

To identify genes that encode maternal components required for development of the germ line in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, we have screened for mutations that confer a maternal-effect sterile or ``grandchildless'' phenotype: homozygous mutant hermaphrodites produced by heterozygous mothers are themselves fertile, but produce sterile progeny. Our screens have identified six loci, defined by 21 mutations. This paper presents genetic and phenotypic characterization of four of the loci. The majority of mutations, those in mes-2, mes-3 and mes-4, affect postembryonic germ-line development; the progeny of mutant mothers undergo apparently normal embryogenesis but develop into agametic adults with 10-1000-fold reductions in number of germ cells. In contrast, mutations in mes-1 cause defects in cytoplasmic partitioning during embryogenesis, and the resulting larvae lack germ-line progenitor cells. Mutations in all of the mes loci primarily affect the germ line, and none disrupt the structural integrity of germ granules. This is in contrast to grandchildless mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, all of which disrupt germ granules and affect abdominal as well as germ-line development.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austin J., Kimble J. glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell. 1987 Nov 20;51(4):589–599. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90128-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boswell R. E., Mahowald A. P. tudor, a gene required for assembly of the germ plasm in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):97–104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deppe U., Schierenberg E., Cole T., Krieg C., Schmitt D., Yoder B., von Ehrenstein G. Cell lineages of the embryo of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):376–380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson E. L., Horvitz H. R. Identification and characterization of 22 genes that affect the vulval cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1985 May;110(1):17–72. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Golden J. W., Riddle D. L. A pheromone-induced developmental switch in Caenorhabditis elegans: Temperature-sensitive mutants reveal a wild-type temperature-dependent process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):819–823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hay B., Ackerman L., Barbel S., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Identification of a component of Drosophila polar granules. Development. 1988 Aug;103(4):625–640. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.4.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herman R. K. Crossover suppressors and balanced recessive lethals in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1978 Jan;88(1):49–65. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirsh D., Oppenheim D., Klass M. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1976 Mar;49(1):200–219. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hodgkin J. Sex determination in the nematode C. elegans: analysis of tra-3 suppressors and characterization of fem genes. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):15–52. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Horvitz H. R., Brenner S., Hodgkin J., Herman R. K. A uniform genetic nomenclature for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Sep;175(2):129–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00425528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Illmensee K., Mahowald A. P., Loomis M. R. The ontogeny of germ plasm during oogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1976 Mar;49(1):40–65. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90257-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Illmensee K., Mahowald A. P. The autonomous function of germ plasm in a somatic region of the Drosophila egg. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Jan;97:127–140. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90662-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Illmensee K., Mahowald A. P. Transplantation of posterior polar plasm in Drosophila. Induction of germ cells at the anterior pole of the egg. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1016–1020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kemphues K. J., Priess J. R., Morton D. G., Cheng N. S. Identification of genes required for cytoplasmic localization in early C. elegans embryos. Cell. 1988 Feb 12;52(3):311–320. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kimble J. E., White J. G. On the control of germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1981 Jan 30;81(2):208–219. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90284-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lehmann R., Nüsslein-Volhard C. Abdominal segmentation, pole cell formation, and embryonic polarity require the localized activity of oskar, a maternal gene in Drosophila. Cell. 1986 Oct 10;47(1):141–152. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90375-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McKim K. S., Rose A. M. Chromosome I duplications in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1990 Jan;124(1):115–132. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Perrimon N., Mohler D., Engstrom L., Mahowald A. P. X-linked female-sterile loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Jul;113(3):695–712. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.3.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L., Curran J. Meiotic pairing behavior of two free duplications of linkage group I in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(1-2):52–56. doi: 10.1007/BF00332723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Strome S., Wood W. B. Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell. 1983 Nov;35(1):15–25. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Strome S., Wood W. B. Immunofluorescence visualization of germ-line-specific cytoplasmic granules in embryos, larvae, and adults of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Mar;79(5):1558–1562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.5.1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES