Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111

Lack of Polymorphism on the Drosophila Fourth Chromosome Resulting from Selection

A J Berry 1, J W Ajioka 1, M Kreitman 1
PMCID: PMC1204775  PMID: 1686006

Abstract

Evolutionary processes can be inferred from comparisons of intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence. We sequenced a 1.1-kb fragment of the cubitus interruptus Dominant (ci(D)) locus located on the nonrecombining fourth chromosome for ten natural lines of Drosophila melanogaster and nine of Drosophila simulans. We found no polymorphism within D. melanogaster and a single polymorphism within D. simulans; divergence between the species was about 5%. Comparison with the alcohol dehydrogenase gene and its two flanking regions in D. melanogaster, for which comparable data are available, revealed a statistically significant departure from neutrality in all three tests. This lack of polymorphism in the ci(D) locus may reflect recent positive selective sweeps on the fourth chromosome with extreme hitchhiking generated by the lack of recombination. By simulation, we estimate there to be a 50% chance that the selective sweeps occurred within the past 30,000 years in D. melanogaster and 75,000 in D. simulans.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (769.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ATWOOD K. C., SCHNEIDER L. K., RYAN F. J. Selective mechanisms in bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:345–355. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dobzhansky T. Genetics of Natural Populations IX. Temporal Changes in the Composition of Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1943 Mar;28(2):162–186. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.2.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eanes W. F., Labate J., Ajioka J. W. Restriction-map variation with the yellow-achaete-scute region in five populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Sep;6(5):492–502. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Higuchi R. G., Ochman H. Production of single-stranded DNA templates by exonuclease digestion following the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jul 25;17(14):5865–5865. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.14.5865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hudson R. R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kreitman M., Aguadé M. Genetic uniformity in two populations of Drosophila melanogaster as revealed by filter hybridization of four-nucleotide-recognizing restriction enzyme digests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(10):3562–3566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.10.3562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Macpherson J. N., Weir B. S., Leigh Brown A. J. Extensive linkage disequilibrium in the achaete-scute complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):121–129. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rowan R. G., Hunt J. A. Rates of DNA change and phylogeny from the DNA sequences of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene for five closely related species of Hawaiian Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Jan;8(1):49–70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheen J. Y., Seed B. Electrolyte gradient gels for DNA sequencing. Biotechniques. 1988 Nov-Dec;6(10):942–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES