Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Feb;130(2):285–294. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.285

Elimination of the Yeast Rad6 Ubiquitin Conjugase Enhances Base-Pair Transitions and G.c -> T.a Transversions as Well as Transposition of the Ty Element: Implications for the Control of Spontaneous Mutation

X Kang 1, F Yadao 1, R D Gietz 1, B A Kunz 1
PMCID: PMC1204849  PMID: 1311695

Abstract

The RAD6 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes an enzyme that conjugates ubiquitin to other proteins. Defects in RAD6 confer a mutator phenotype due, in part, to an increased rate of transposition of the yeast Ty element. To further delineate the role of protein ubiquitination in the control of spontaneous mutagenesis in yeast, we have characterized 202 mutations that arose spontaneously in the SUP4-o gene carried on a centromere vector in a RAD6 deletion strain. The resulting mutational spectrum was compared to that for 354 spontaneous SUP4-o mutations isolated in the isogenic wild-type parent. This comparison revealed that the rad6 mutator enhanced the rate of single base-pair substitution, as well as Ty insertion, but did not affect the rates of the other mutational classes detected. Relative to the wild-type parent, Ty inserted at considerably more SUP4-o positions in the rad6 strain with a significantly smaller fraction detected at a transposition hotspot. These findings suggest that, in addition to the rate of transposition, protein ubiquitination might influence the target site specificity of Ty insertion. The increase in the substitution rate accounted for approximately 90% of the rad6 mutator effect but only the two transitions and the G.C -> T.A transversion were enhanced. Analysis of the distribution of these events within SUP4-o suggested that the site specificity of the substitutions was influenced by DNA sequence context. Transformation of heteroduplex plasmid DNAs into the two strains demonstrated that the rad6 mutator did not reduce the efficiency of correcting mismatches that could give rise to the transitions or transversion nor did it bias restoration of the mismatches to the incorrect base-pairs. These results are discussed in relation to possible mechanisms that might link ubiquitination of proteins to spontaneous mutation rates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams W. T., Skopek T. R. Statistical test for the comparison of samples from mutational spectra. J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 5;194(3):391–396. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90669-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop D. K., Andersen J., Kolodner R. D. Specificity of mismatch repair following transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with heteroduplex plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3713–3717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chlebowicz E., Jachymczyk W. J. Endonuclease for apurinic sites in yeast. Comparison of the enzyme activity in the wild type and in rad mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to MNS. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Jul 20;154(2):221–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00330841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark D. J., Bilanchone V. W., Haywood L. J., Dildine S. L., Sandmeyer S. B. A yeast sigma composite element, TY3, has properties of a retrotransposon. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jan 25;263(3):1413–1423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drake J. W. A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7160–7164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fabre F., Magana-Schwencke N., Chanet R. Isolation of the RAD18 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and construction of rad18 deletion mutants. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Feb;215(3):425–430. doi: 10.1007/BF00427039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fehér Z., Schlagman S. L., Miner Z., Hattman S. The UV excision-repair system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in the removal of methylcytosines formed in vivo by a cloned prokaryotic DNA methyltransferase. Curr Genet. 1989 Dec;16(5-6):461–464. doi: 10.1007/BF00340726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedberg E. C. Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Mar;52(1):70–102. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.70-102.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Game J. C., Little J. G., Haynes R. H. Yeast mutants sensitive to trimethoprim. Mutat Res. 1975 May;28(2):175–182. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haas A. L., Reback P. B., Chau V. Ubiquitin conjugation by the yeast RAD6 and CDC34 gene products. Comparison to their putative rabbit homologs, E2(20K) AND E2(32K). J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 15;266(8):5104–5112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hastings P. J., Quah S. K., von Borstel R. C. Spontaneous mutation by mutagenic repair of spontaneous lesions in DNA. Nature. 1976 Dec 23;264(5588):719–722. doi: 10.1038/264719a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoekstra M. F., Malone R. E. Excision repair functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae recognize and repair methylation of adenine by the Escherichia coli dam gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;6(10):3555–3558. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.10.3555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmes J., Jr, Clark S., Modrich P. Strand-specific mismatch correction in nuclear extracts of human and Drosophila melanogaster cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(15):5837–5841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jentsch S., Seufert W., Sommer T., Reins H. A. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes: novel regulators of eukaryotic cells. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 May;15(5):195–198. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90161-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones J. S., Prakash L. Transcript levels of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA repair gene RAD18 increase in UV irradiated cells and during meiosis but not during the mitotic cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Feb 25;19(4):893–898. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones J. S., Weber S., Prakash L. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD18 gene encodes a protein that contains potential zinc finger domains for nucleic acid binding and a putative nucleotide binding sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jul 25;16(14B):7119–7131. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.14.7119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Knapp G., Beckmann J. S., Johnson P. F., Fuhrman S. A., Abelson J. Transcription and processing of intervening sequences in yeast tRNA genes. Cell. 1978 Jun;14(2):221–236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90109-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohalmi S. E., Glattke M., McIntosh E. M., Kunz B. A. Mutational specificity of DNA precursor pool imbalances in yeast arising from deoxycytidylate deaminase deficiency or treatment with thymidylate. J Mol Biol. 1991 Aug 20;220(4):933–946. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90364-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Koken M., Reynolds P., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J., Prakash S., Prakash L. Dhr6, a Drosophila homolog of the yeast DNA-repair gene RAD6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 1;88(9):3832–3836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kramer B., Kramer W., Williamson M. S., Fogel S. Heteroduplex DNA correction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mismatch specific and requires functional PMS genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4432–4440. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kunz B. A., Kohalmi L., Kang X. L., Magnusson K. A. Specificity of the mutator effect caused by disruption of the RAD1 excision repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jun;172(6):3009–3014. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.6.3009-3014.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kunz B. A., Pierce M. K., Mis J. R., Giroux C. N. DNA sequence analysis of the mutational specificity of u.v. light in the SUP4-o gene of yeast. Mutagenesis. 1987 Nov;2(6):445–453. doi: 10.1093/mutage/2.6.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Messing J., Vieira J. A new pair of M13 vectors for selecting either DNA strand of double-digest restriction fragments. Gene. 1982 Oct;19(3):269–276. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mis J. R., Kunz B. A. Analysis of mutations induced in the SUP4-o gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cis-diammine dichloroplatinum(II). Carcinogenesis. 1990 Apr;11(4):633–638. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Newlon C. S. Yeast chromosome replication and segregation. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Dec;52(4):568–601. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.4.568-601.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Picologlou S., Brown N., Liebman S. W. Mutations in RAD6, a yeast gene encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, stimulate retrotransposition. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;10(3):1017–1022. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Qin S., Nakajima B., Nomura M., Arfin S. M. Cloning and characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene encoding a new member of the ubiquitin-conjugating protein family. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 15;266(23):15549–15554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schiestl R. H., Gietz R. D. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989 Dec;16(5-6):339–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00340712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schneider R., Eckerskorn C., Lottspeich F., Schweiger M. The human ubiquitin carrier protein E2(Mr = 17,000) is homologous to the yeast DNA repair gene RAD6. EMBO J. 1990 May;9(5):1431–1435. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08259.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shaw K. J., Olson M. V. Effects of altered 5'-flanking sequences on the in vivo expression of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNATyr gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;4(4):657–665. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.4.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sullivan M. L., Vierstra R. D. A ubiquitin carrier protein from wheat germ is structurally and functionally similar to the yeast DNA repair enzyme encoded by RAD6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9861–9865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sung P., Prakash S., Prakash L. Mutation of cysteine-88 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 protein abolishes its ubiquitin-conjugating activity and its various biological functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2695–2699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilke C. M., Heidler S. H., Brown N., Liebman S. W. Analysis of yeast retrotransposon Ty insertions at the CAN1 locus. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):655–665. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES