Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Feb;130(2):345–353. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.345

How Small Are the Smallest Selectable Domains of Form?

K E Weber 1
PMCID: PMC1204854  PMID: 1541394

Abstract

Two lines of Drosophila melanogaster from the same base population were selected in opposite directions to produce simultaneous antagonistic changes in two very small (<0.2 mm) and closely adjacent (<0.3 mm) dimensions within the base of the wing. Wing dimensions near the targeted area became differentiated by large positive and negative percentage differences, while only small homogeneous percentage changes occurred in the remainder of the wing. If very small regions of morphology (less than 100 cells across) can respond to selection almost independently, even in small population samples, then the control of developmental detail must involve many genes, and the diversity of possible outcomes in development and adaptation must be large.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashburner M. The genetics of a small autosomal region of Drosophila melanogaster containing the structural gene for alcohol dehydrogenase. III. Hypomorphic and hypermorphic mutations affecting the expression of hairless. Genetics. 1982 Jul-Aug;101(3-4):447–459. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.3-4.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey D. W. Genes that affect morphogenesis of the murine mandible. Recombinant-inbred strain analysis. J Hered. 1986 Jan-Feb;77(1):17–25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey D. W. Genes that affect the shape of the murine mandible. Congenic strain analysis. J Hered. 1985 Mar-Apr;76(2):107–114. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherry L. M., Case S. M., Kunkel J. G., Wilson A. C. Comparisons of frogs, humans, and chimpanzees. Science. 1979 Apr 27;204(4391):435–435. doi: 10.1126/science.204.4391.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chinnici J. P. Modification of recombination frequency in Drosophila. I. Selection for increased and decreased crossing over. Genetics. 1971 Sep;69(1):71–83. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cock A. G. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q Rev Biol. 1966 Jun;41(2):131–190. doi: 10.1086/404940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyne J. A., Rux J., David J. R. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet Res. 1991 Apr;57(2):113–122. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300029177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. French V., Bryant P. J., Bryant S. V. Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. Science. 1976 Sep 10;193(4257):969–981. doi: 10.1126/science.948762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. García-Bellido A. Genetic control of wing disc development in Drosophila. Ciba Found Symp. 1975;0(29):161–182. doi: 10.1002/9780470720110.ch8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill W. G. Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction. Biometrics. 1972 Sep;28(3):767–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holder N. Developmental constraints and the evolution of vertebrate digit patterns. J Theor Biol. 1983 Oct 7;104(3):451–471. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(83)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis J. H., Wolpert L. The principle of non-equivalence in development. J Theor Biol. 1976 Oct 21;62(2):479–490. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(76)90132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meinhardt H. Cell determination boundaries as organizing regions for secondary embryonic fields. Dev Biol. 1983 Apr;96(2):375–385. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90175-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pennycuik P. R., Rendel J. M. Selection for constancy of score and pattern of secondary vibrissae in Ta/Ta-Ta/Y and Ta/+ mice. Aust J Biol Sci. 1977 Aug;30(4):303–317. doi: 10.1071/bi9770303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roff D. A., Mousseau T. A. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Feb;58(Pt 1):103–118. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SCHARLOO W. THE EFFECT OF DISRUPTIVE AND STABILIZING SELECTION ON THE EXPRESSION OF A CUBITUS INTERRUPTUS MUTANT IN DROSOPHILA. Genetics. 1964 Oct;50:553–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.4.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SPICKETT S. G. GENETIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES OF A QUANTITATIVE CHARACTER. Nature. 1963 Aug 31;199:870–873. doi: 10.1038/199870a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith J M, Sondhi K C. The Genetics of a Pattern. Genetics. 1960 Aug;45(8):1039–1050. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.8.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spicer G. S. The genetic basis of a species-specific character in the Drosophila virilis species group. Genetics. 1991 Jun;128(2):331–337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stock G. B., Bryant S. V. Studies of digit regeneration and their implications for theories of development and evolution of vertebrate limbs. J Exp Zool. 1981 Jun;216(3):423–433. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402160311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson J. N., Jr Studies on the nature and function of polygenic loci in Drosophila. I. Comparison of genomes from selection lines. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Dec;33(3):373–387. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson J. N., Jr Studies on the nature and function of polygenic loci in Drosophila. II. The subthreshold wing vein pattern revealed in selection experiments. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Dec;33(3):389–401. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Waddington C. H. Preliminary Notes on the Development of the Wings in Normal and Mutant Strains of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1939 Jul;25(7):299–307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.25.7.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Weber K. E. Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):975–989. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES