Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Mar;130(3):507–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.3.507

An Empirical Test of the Meiotic Drive Models of Hybrid Sterility: Sex-Ratio Data from Hybrids between Drosophila Simulans and Drosophila Sechellia

N A Johnson 1, C I Wu 1
PMCID: PMC1204868  PMID: 1551573

Abstract

Recently, there has been much discussion regarding the hypothesis that divergence of meiotic drive systems in isolated populations can generate the patterns of reproductive isolation observed in animal hybridizations. One prediction from this hypothesis is that the sex ratio of hybrids with heterospecific sex chromosomes should greatly deviate from the Mendelian expectation of 50% female. From sex-ratio data in our Drosophila hybridization studies, we find no such deviation: the sex ratio of offspring of males with introgressed heterospecific Y chromosomes with various autosomal backgrounds does not differ from that of the pure species. We also discuss other aspects of the current meiotic drive models.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (543.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charlesworth B., Hartl D. L. Population Dynamics of the Segregation Distorter Polymorphism of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1978 May;89(1):171–192. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.1.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cobbs G., Jewell L., Gordon L. Male-sex-ratio trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura: frequency of autosomal aneuploid sperm. Genetics. 1991 Feb;127(2):381–390. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.2.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne J. A. A test of the role of meiotic drive in fixing a pericentric inversion. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):241–243. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coyne J. A., Charlesworth B. Genetic analysis of X-linked sterility in hybrids between three sibling species of Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1989 Feb;62(Pt 1):97–106. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1989.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coyne J. A., Charlesworth B. Location of an X-linked factor causing sterility in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Heredity (Edinb) 1986 Oct;57(Pt 2):243–246. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1986.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Denell R. E. The relationship between first and second chromosome segregarion ratios from Drosophila melanogaster males bearing segregation distorter. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;110(2):166–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dobzhansky T. Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids. Genetics. 1936 Mar;21(2):113–135. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.2.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gershenson S. A New Sex-Ratio Abnormality in DROSOPHILA OBSCURA. Genetics. 1928 Nov;13(6):488–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/13.6.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hennig W. Gene interactions in germ differentiation of Drosophila. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1976;15:363–371. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(77)90025-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hiraizumi Y. Negative segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster: a challenge to the concept of differential sensitivity of Rsp alleles. Genetics. 1990 Jul;125(3):515–525. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.3.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hurst L. D., Pomiankowski A. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):841–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NOVITSKI E., PEACOCK W. J., ENGEL J. CYTOLOGICAL BASIS OF "SEX RATIO" IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. Science. 1965 Apr 23;148(3669):516–517. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3669.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Naveira H., Fontdevila A. The Evolutionary History of DROSOPHILA BUZZATII. Xii. the Genetic Basis of Sterility in Hybrids between D. BUZZATII and Its Sibling D. SERIDO from Argentina. Genetics. 1986 Nov;114(3):841–857. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.3.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Powers P. A., Ganetzky B. On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Molecular analysis of the Sd locus. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):133–144. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tokuyasu K. T., Peacock W. J., Hardy R. W. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1972;124(4):479–506. doi: 10.1007/BF00335253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Voelker R. A. Preliminary characterization of "sex ratio" and rediscovery and reinterpretation of "male sex ratio" in Drosophila affinis. Genetics. 1972 Aug;71(4):597–606. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.4.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu C. I., Beckenbach A. T. Evidence for Extensive Genetic Differentiation between the Sex-Ratio and the Standard Arrangement of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and D. PERSIMILIS and Identification of Hybrid Sterility Factors. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):71–86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu C. I. The fate of autosomal modifiers of the sex-ratio trait in drosophila and other sex-linked meiotic drive systems. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Oct;24(2):107–120. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES