Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Mar;130(3):613–620. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.3.613

Polygenic and Single Gene Responses to Selection for Resistance to Diazinon in Lucilia Cuprina

J A McKenzie 1, A G Parker 1, J L Yen 1
PMCID: PMC1204877  PMID: 1551581

Abstract

Following mutagenesis with ethyl methanesulfonate, selection in a susceptible strain with a concentration of the insecticide diazinon (0.0004%, w/v) above that required to kill 100% of the susceptible strain, the LC(100) of that strain, resulted in a single gene response. The resultant four mutant resistant strains have equivalent physiological, genetical and biochemical profiles to a diazinon-resistant strain derived from a natural population and homozygous for the Rop-1 allele. Modification of the microsomal esterase E(3) is responsible for resistance in each case. The Rop-1 locus maps approximately 4.4 map units proximal to bu on chromosome IV. Selection within the susceptible distribution, at a concentration of diazinon [0.0001% (w/v)] less than the LC(100), resulted in a similar phenotypic response irrespective of whether the base population had been mutagenized. The responses were polygenically based, unique to each selection line and independent of Rop-1. The relevance of the results to selection for insecticide resistance in laboratory and natural populations is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ffrench-Constant R. H., Roush R. T., Mortlock D., Dively G. P. Isolation of dieldrin resistance from field populations of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Econ Entomol. 1990 Oct;83(5):1733–1737. doi: 10.1093/jee/83.5.1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Houpt D. R., Pursey J. C., Morton R. A. Genes controlling malathion resistance in a laboratory-selected population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome. 1988 Dec;30(6):844–853. doi: 10.1139/g88-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee B. T., Parsons P. A. Selection, prediction and response. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1968 May;43(2):139–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1968.tb00957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin P. J., McKenzie J. A., Stone R. A. The inheritance of thiabendazole resistance in Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Int J Parasitol. 1988 Sep;18(6):703–709. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(88)90109-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McKenzie J. A., Clarke G. M. Diazinon resistance, fluctuating asymmetry and fitness in the Australian sheep blowfly, lucilia cuprina. Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):213–220. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.1.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKenzie J. A., Dearn J. M., Whitten M. J. Genetic basis of resistance to diazinon in Victorian populations of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Aust J Biol Sci. 1980 Mar;33(1):85–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES