Abstract
We investigate the possibility that differences between synonymous substitution rates of organelle and bacterial genes differing only in copy number may be due to conversion bias. We find that the rather large observed difference in the synonymous rates between genes in the single copy and inverted-repeat regions of chloroplasts can be accounted for by a very small bias against new mutants. More generally, differences in the within-organelle fixation probability result in different apparent mutation rates as measured by the expected rate of appearance of cells homoplasmic for new mutants. Thus, differences in intracellular population parameters rather than molecular mechanisms can account for some variation in the apparent mutation rates of organelle genes, and possibly in other systems with variable numbers of gene copies. On the other hand, our analysis suggests that conversion bias is not a likely explanation for relatively low mutation rates observed near the replication origin of bacterial chromosomes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (752.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Backer J. S., Birky C. W., Jr The origin of mutant cells: mechanisms by which Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces cells homoplasmic for new mitochondrial mutations. Curr Genet. 1985;9(8):627–640. doi: 10.1007/BF00449815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birky C. W., Jr Relaxed cellular controls and organelle heredity. Science. 1983 Nov 4;222(4623):468–475. doi: 10.1126/science.6353578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birky C. W., Jr, Skavaril R. V. Maintenance of genetic homogeneity in systems with multiple genomes. Genet Res. 1976 Apr;27(2):249–265. doi: 10.1017/s001667230001644x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell J. L., Kleckner N. E. coli oriC and the dnaA gene promoter are sequestered from dam methyltransferase following the passage of the chromosomal replication fork. Cell. 1990 Sep 7;62(5):967–979. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90271-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chiu W. L., Sears B. B. Recombination between chloroplast DNAs does not occur in sexual crosses of Oenothera. Mol Gen Genet. 1985;198(3):525–528. doi: 10.1007/BF00332951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medgyesy P., Fejes E., Maliga P. Interspecific chloroplast recombination in a Nicotiana somatic hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6960–6964. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagylaki T., Petes T. D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion and the maintenance of sequence homogeneity among repeated genes. Genetics. 1982 Feb;100(2):315–337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neale D. B., Marshall K. A., Sederoff R. R. Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA are paternally inherited in Sequoia sempervirens D. Don Endl. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(23):9347–9349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newman S. M., Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W., Randolph-Anderson B. L., Johnson A. M., Harris E. H. Transformation of chloroplast ribosomal RNA genes in Chlamydomonas: molecular and genetic characterization of integration events. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):875–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharp P. M., Shields D. C., Wolfe K. H., Li W. H. Chromosomal location and evolutionary rate variation in enterobacterial genes. Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):808–810. doi: 10.1126/science.2683084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas B. J., Rothstein R. Sex, maps, and imprinting. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90199-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh J. B. Role of biased gene conversion in one-locus neutral theory and genome evolution. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):461–468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]