Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Apr;130(4):717–728. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.717

Effects of Mutagen-Sensitive Mus Mutations on Spontaneous Mitotic Recombination in Aspergillus

P Zhao 1, E Kafer 1
PMCID: PMC1204923  PMID: 1582555

Abstract

Methyl methane-sulfonate (MMS)-sensitive, radiation-induced mutants of Aspergillus were shown to define nine new DNA repair genes, musK to musS. To test mus mutations for effects on mitotic recombination, intergenic crossing over was assayed between color markers and their centromeres, and intragenic recombination between two distinguishable adE alleles. Of eight mutants analyzed, four showed significant deviations from mus(+) controls in both tests. Two mutations, musK and musL, reduced recombination, while musN and musQ caused increases. In contrast, musO diploids produced significantly higher levels only for intragenic recombination. Effects were relatively small, but averages between hypo- and hyperrec mus differed 15-20-fold. In musL diploids, most of the rare color segregants resulted from mitotic malsegregation rather than intergenic crossing over. This indicates that the musL gene product is required for recombination and that DNA lesions lead to chromosome loss when it is deficient. In addition, analysis of the genotypes of intragenic (ad(+)) recombinants showed that the musL mutation specifically reduced single allele conversion but increased complex conversion types (especially recombinants homozygous for ad(+)). Similar analysis revealed differences between the effects of two hyperrec mutations; musN apparently caused high levels solely of mitotic crossing over, while musQ increased various conversion types but not reciprocal crossovers. These results suggest that mitotic gene conversion and crossing over, while generally associated, are affected differentially in some of the mus strains of Aspergillus nidulans.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. HPR1, a novel yeast gene that prevents intrachromosomal excision recombination, shows carboxy-terminal homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TOP1 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;10(4):1439–1451. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.4.1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bollag R. J., Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:199–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow T. Y., Resnick M. A. An endo-exonuclease activity of yeast that requires a functional RAD52 gene. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Jan;211(1):41–48. doi: 10.1007/BF00338391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox M. M., Lehman I. R. Enzymes of general recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:229–262. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fortuin J. J. Another two genes controlling mitotic intragenic recombination and recovery from UV damage in Aspergillus nidulans. IV. Genetic analysis of mitotic intragenic recombinants from uvs + -uvs + ,uvsD-uvsD and uvsE-uvsE diploids. Mutat Res. 1971 Oct;13(2):137–148. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(71)90006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraser M. J., Koa H., Chow T. Y. Neurospora endo-exonuclease is immunochemically related to the recC gene product of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jan;172(1):507–510. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.507-510.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedberg E. C. Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Mar;52(1):70–102. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.70-102.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gatti M. Genetic control of chromosome breakage and rejoining in Drosophila melanogaster: spontaneous chromosome aberrations in X-linked mutants defective in DNA metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1377–1381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haber J. E., Hearn M. Rad52-independent mitotic gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae frequently results in chromosomal loss. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):7–22. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jansen G. J. Abnormal frequencies of spontaneous mitotic recombination in uvsB and uvsC mutants of Aspergillus nidulans. Mutat Res. 1970 Jul;10(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90143-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kitani Y. Absence of interference in association with gene conversion in Sordaria fimicola, and presence of interference in association with ordinary recombination. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):467–497. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koa H., Fraser M. J., Käfer E. Endo-exonuclease of Aspergillus nidulans. Biochem Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;68(1):387–392. doi: 10.1139/o90-054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Käfer E., Mayor O. Genetic analysis of DNA repair in Aspergillus: evidence for different types of MMS-sensitive hyperrec mutants. Mutat Res. 1986 Jul;161(2):119–134. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(86)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Käfer E. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and its chromosomal aberrations. Adv Genet. 1977;19:33–131. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60245-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malone R. E., Montelone B. A., Edwards C., Carney K., Hoekstra M. F. A reexamination of the role of the RAD52 gene in spontaneous mitotic recombination. Curr Genet. 1988 Sep;14(3):211–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00376741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicolas A., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35–39. doi: 10.1038/338035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Fungal recombination. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Mar;49(1):33–58. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.1.33-58.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PONTECORVO G., ROPER J. A., HEMMONS L. M., MACDONALD K. D., BUFTON A. W. J. The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans. Adv Genet. 1953;5:141–238. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60408-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roeder G. S., Stewart S. E. Mitotic recombination in yeast. Trends Genet. 1988 Sep;4(9):263–267. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sarkar S. Haldane's solution of the Luria-Delbrück distribution. Genetics. 1991 Feb;127(2):257–261. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shanfield B., Käfer E. UV-sensitive mutants increasing mitotic crossing-over in Aspergillus nidulans. Mutat Res. 1969 May-Jun;7(3):485–487. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith G. R. Homologous recombination in E. coli: multiple pathways for multiple reasons. Cell. 1989 Sep 8;58(5):807–809. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90929-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Timberlake W. E. Molecular genetics of Aspergillus development. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:5–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.000253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES