Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 May;131(1):31–42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.31

Fitness Effects of Ty Transposition in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

C M Wilke 1, J Adams 1
PMCID: PMC1204961  PMID: 1317316

Abstract

It has been suggested that the primary evolutionary role of transposable elements is negative and parasitic. Alternatively, the target specificity and gene regulatory capabilities of many transposable elements raise the possibility that transposable element-induced mutations are more likely to be adaptively favorable than other types of mutations. Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing large amounts of variation for Ty1 genomic insertions were constructed, and the effects of Ty1 copy number on two components of fitness, yield and growth rate were determined. Although mean stationary phase density decreased with increased Ty1 copy number, the variance and range increased. The distributions of stationary phase densities indicate that many Ty1 insertions have negative effects on fitness, but also that some may have positive effects. To test directly for adaptively favorable Ty1 insertions, populations containing large amounts of variability for Ty1 copy number were grown in continuous culture. After 98-112 generations the frequency of clones containing zero Ty1 elements had decreased to ~0.0, and specific Ty1-containing clone families had predominated. Considering that most of the genetic variation in the populations was due to Ty1 transposition, and that Ty1 insertions had, on average, a negative effect on fitness, we conclude that Ty1 transposition events were directly responsible for the production of adaptive mutations in the clones that predominated in the populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams J., Hansche P. E. Population studies in microorganisms. I. Evolution of diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):327–338. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birnboim H. C., Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 24;7(6):1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boeke J. D., Eichinger D. J., Natsoulis G. Doubling Ty1 element copy number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: host genome stability and phenotypic effects. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1043–1052. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boeke J. D., Garfinkel D. J., Styles C. A., Fink G. R. Ty elements transpose through an RNA intermediate. Cell. 1985 Mar;40(3):491–500. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90197-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeke J. D., Styles C. A., Fink G. R. Saccharomyces cerevisiae SPT3 gene is required for transposition and transpositional recombination of chromosomal Ty elements. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3575–3581. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell A. Evolutionary significance of accessory DNA elements in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1981;35:55–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.35.100181.000415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao L., McBroom S. M. Evolution of transposable elements: an IS10 insertion increases fitness in Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Sep;2(5):359–369. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao L., Vargas C., Spear B. B., Cox E. C. Transposable elements as mutator genes in evolution. Nature. 1983 Jun 16;303(5918):633–635. doi: 10.1038/303633a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth B., Langley C. H. The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:251–287. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Diehl B. E., Pringle J. R. Molecular analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome I: identification of additional transcribed regions and demonstration that some encode essential functions. Genetics. 1991 Feb;127(2):287–298. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.2.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doolittle W. F., Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):601–603. doi: 10.1038/284601a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eibel H., Gafner J., Stotz A., Philippsen P. Characterization of the yeast mobile element Ty1. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1981;45(Pt 2):609–617. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1981.045.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Errede B., Cardillo T. S., Sherman F., Dubois E., Deschamps J., Wiame J. M. Mating signals control expression of mutations resulting from insertion of a transposable repetitive element adjacent to diverse yeast genes. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):427–436. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90353-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Finnegan D. J. Eukaryotic transposable elements and genome evolution. Trends Genet. 1989 Apr;5(4):103–107. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Garfinkel D. J., Strathern J. N. Ty mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:342–361. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iida H. Multistress resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is generated by insertion of retrotransposon Ty into the 5' coding region of the adenylate cyclase gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5555–5560. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kleckner N. Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.001501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klein H. L., Petes T. D. Genetic mapping of Ty elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;4(2):329–339. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kurlandzka A., Rosenzweig R. F., Adams J. Identification of adaptive changes in an evolving population of Escherichia coli: the role of changes with regulatory and highly pleiotropic effects. Mol Biol Evol. 1991 May;8(3):261–281. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liebman S., Shalit P., Picologlou S. Ty elements are involved in the formation of deletions in DEL1 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 1981 Nov;26(3 Pt 1):401–409. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90209-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. MCCLINTOCK B. Controlling elements and the gene. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1956;21:197–216. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mackay T. F. Transposable elements and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome. 1989;31(1):284–295. doi: 10.1139/g89-046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mandel M., Higa A. Calcium-dependent bacteriophage DNA infection. J Mol Biol. 1970 Oct 14;53(1):159–162. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Natsoulis G., Thomas W., Roghmann M. C., Winston F., Boeke J. D. Ty1 transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is nonrandom. Genetics. 1989 Oct;123(2):269–279. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Orgel L. E., Crick F. H. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):604–607. doi: 10.1038/284604a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paquin C. E., Williamson V. M. Ty insertions at two loci account for most of the spontaneous antimycin A resistance mutations during growth at 15 degrees C of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains lacking ADH1. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;6(1):70–79. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.1.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pasyukova E. G., Belyaeva E. S., Kogan G. L., Kaidanov L. Z., Gvozdev V. A. Concerted transpositions of mobile genetic elements coupled with fitness changes in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Jul;3(4):299–312. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rigby P. W., Dieckmann M., Rhodes C., Berg P. Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jun 15;113(1):237–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sandmeyer S. B., Hansen L. J., Chalker D. L. Integration specificity of retrotransposons and retroviruses. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:491–518. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.002423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Scherer S., Davis R. W. Recombination of dispersed repeated DNA sequences in yeast. Science. 1980 Sep 19;209(4463):1380–1384. doi: 10.1126/science.6251545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Simchen G., Winston F., Styles C. A., Fink G. R. Ty-mediated gene expression of the LYS2 and HIS4 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the same SPT genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(8):2431–2434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.8.2431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith G. E., Summers M. D. The bidirectional transfer of DNA and RNA to nitrocellulose or diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper. Anal Biochem. 1980 Nov 15;109(1):123–129. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stavenhagen J. B., Robins D. M. An ancient provirus has imposed androgen regulation on the adjacent mouse sex-limited protein gene. Cell. 1988 Oct 21;55(2):247–254. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90047-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Toh-e A., Kaneko Y., Akimaru J., Oshima Y. An insertion mutation associated with constitutive expression of repressible acid phosphatase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;191(3):339–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00425743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Voelker R. A., Graves J., Gibson W., Eisenberg M. Mobile element insertions causing mutations in the Drosophila suppressor of sable locus occur in DNase I hypersensitive subregions of 5'-transcribed nontranslated sequences. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):1071–1082. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilke C. M., Heidler S. H., Brown N., Liebman S. W. Analysis of yeast retrotransposon Ty insertions at the CAN1 locus. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):655–665. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Williamson V. M., Young E. T., Ciriacy M. Transposable elements associated with constitutive expression of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase II. Cell. 1981 Feb;23(2):605–614. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90156-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yanisch-Perron C., Vieira J., Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33(1):103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES