Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Sep;132(1):135–148. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.135

Correlation between Pairing Initiation Sites, Recombination Nodules and Meiotic Recombination in Sordaria Macrospora

D Zickler 1, PJF Moreau 1, A D Huynh 1, A M Slezec 1
PMCID: PMC1205112  PMID: 1398050

Abstract

The decrease of meiotic exchanges (crossing over and conversion) in two mutants of Sordaria macrospora correlated strongly with a reduction of chiasmata and of both types of ``recombination nodules.'' Serial section reconstruction electron microscopy was used to compare the synapsis pattern of meiotic prophase I in wild type and mutants. First, synapsis occurred but the number of synaptonemal complex initiation sites was reduced in both mutants. Second, this reduction was accompanied by, or resulted in, modifications of the pattern of synapsis. Genetic and synaptonemal complex maps were compared in three regions along one chromosome arm divided into well marked intervals. Reciprocal exchange frequencies and number of recombination nodules correlated in wild type in the three analyzed intervals, but disparity was found between the location of recombination nodules and exchanges in the mutants. Despite the twofold exchange decrease, sections of the genome such as the short arm of chromosome 2 and telomere regions were sheltered from nodule decrease and from pairing modifications. This indicated a certain amount of diversity in the control of these features and suggested that exchange frequency was dependent not only on the amount of effective pairing but also on the localization of the pairing sites, as revealed by the synaptonemal complex progression in the mutants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alani E., Padmore R., Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell. 1990 May 4;61(3):419–436. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90524-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Esposito M. S., Esposito R. E., Sandler L. The genetic control of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:53–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhargava J., Engebrecht J., Roeder G. S. The rec102 mutant of yeast is defective in meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):59–69. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bojko M. Two kinds of "recombination nodules" in Neurospora crassa. Genome. 1989 Apr;32(2):309–317. doi: 10.1139/g89-446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpenter A. T. Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and the initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays. 1987 May;6(5):232–236. doi: 10.1002/bies.950060510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carpenter A. T. Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1979;75(3):259–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00293472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpenter A. T. Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):511–541. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Catcheside D. E. A restriction and modification model for the initiation and control of recombination in Neurospora. Genet Res. 1986 Jun;47(3):157–165. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300023077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cawood A. H., Breckon G. Transmission of three radiation-induced translations in the Syrian hamster. I. Chromosome studies of male meiosis: pachytene to metaphase II. Chromosoma. 1989 Oct;98(4):301–306. doi: 10.1007/BF00327317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Croft J. A., Jones G. H. Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii. IV. Recombination nodules in spermatocytes and a test of the correspondence of late recombination nodules and chiasmata. Genetics. 1989 Feb;121(2):255–262. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Egel R. Synaptonemal complex and crossing-over: structural support or interference? Heredity (Edinb) 1978 Oct;41(2):233–237. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1978.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Engebrecht J., Hirsch J., Roeder G. S. Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over: their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation. Cell. 1990 Sep 7;62(5):927–937. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90267-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gorlov I. P., Ladygina T Y. u., Serov O. L., Borodin P. M. Positional control of chiasma distribution in the house mouse. Chiasma distribution in mice homozygous and heterozygous for an inversion in chromosome 1. Heredity (Edinb) 1991 Jun;66(Pt 3):453–458. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1991.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holliday R. Recombination and meiosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Mar 21;277(955):359–370. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huynh A. D., Leblon G., Zickler D. Indirect intergenic suppression of a radiosensitive mutant of Sordaria macrospora defective in sister-chromatid cohesiveness. Curr Genet. 1986;10(7):545–555. doi: 10.1007/BF00447389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones G. H. The control of chiasma distribution. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1984;38:293–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. King J. S., Mortimer R. K. A polymerization model of chiasma interference and corresponding computer simulation. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):1127–1138. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leblon G., Zickler D., Lebilcot S. Most Uv-Induced Reciprocal Translocations in SORDARIA MACROSPORA Occur in or near Centromere Regions. Genetics. 1986 Feb;112(2):183–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.2.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Loidl J. The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view. Genome. 1990 Dec;33(6):759–778. doi: 10.1139/g90-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maguire M. P. Crossover site determination and interference. J Theor Biol. 1988 Oct 21;134(4):565–570. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maguire M. P. Homologous chromosome pairing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Mar 21;277(955):245–258. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PERKINS D. D. Crossing-over and interference in a multiply marked chromosome arm of Neurospora. Genetics. 1962 Sep;47:1253–1274. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.9.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roeder G. S. Chromosome synapsis and genetic recombination: their roles in meiotic chromosome segregation. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):385–389. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90297-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sandler L., Lindsley D. L., Nicoletti B., Trippa G. Mutants affecting meiosis in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1968 Nov;60(3):525–558. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.3.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simchen G., Stamberg J. Fine and coarse controls of genetic recombination. Nature. 1969 Apr 26;222(5191):329–332. doi: 10.1038/222329a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smithies O., Powers P. A. Gene conversions and their relation to homologous chromosome pairing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986 Jan 29;312(1154):291–302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Solari A. J., Fechheimer N. S., Bitgood J. J. Pairing of ZW gonosomes and the localized recombination nodule in two Z-autosome translocations in Gallus domesticus. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1988;48(3):130–136. doi: 10.1159/000132609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stern H., Hotta Y. Biochemistry of meiosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Mar 21;277(955):277–294. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sudman P. D., Greenbaum I. F. Unequal crossing over and heterochromatin exchange in the X-Y bivalents of the deer mouse, Peromyscus beatae. Chromosoma. 1990 Jul;99(3):183–189. doi: 10.1007/BF01731128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zickler D. Development of the synaptonemal complex and the "recombination nodules" during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma. 1977 Jun 23;61(4):289–316. doi: 10.1007/BF00288615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. von Wettstein D., Rasmussen S. W., Holm P. B. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:331–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.18.120184.001555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES