Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Sep;132(1):193–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.193

Variable Rates of Evolution among Drosophila Opsin Genes

J P Carulli 1, D L Hartl 1
PMCID: PMC1205116  PMID: 1398053

Abstract

DNA sequences and chromosomal locations of four Drosophila pseudoobscura opsin genes were compared with those from Drosophila melanogaster, to determine factors that influence the evolution of multigene families. Although the opsin proteins perform the same primary functions, the comparisons reveal a wide range of evolutionary rates. Amino acid identities for the opsins range from 90% for Rh2 to more than 95% for Rh1 and Rh4. Variation in the rate of synonymous site substitution is especially striking: the major opsin, encoded by the Rh1 locus, differs at only 26.1% of synonymous sites between D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster, while the other opsin loci differ by as much as 39.2% at synonymous sites. Rh3 and Rh4 have similar levels of synonymous nucleotide substitution but significantly different amounts of amino acid replacement. This decoupling of nucleotide substitution and amino acid replacement suggests that different selective pressures are acting on these similar genes. There is significant heterogeneity in base composition and codon usage bias among the opsin genes in both species, but there are no consistent relationships between these factors and the rate of evolution of the opsins. In addition to exhibiting variation in evolutionary rates, the opsin loci in these species reveal rearrangements of chromosome elements.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ajioka J. W., Smoller D. A., Jones R. W., Carulli J. P., Vellek A. E., Garza D., Link A. J., Duncan I. W., Hartl D. L. Drosophila genome project: one-hit coverage in yeast artificial chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1991 Sep;100(8):495–509. doi: 10.1007/BF00352200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beverley S. M., Wilson A. C. Molecular evolution in Drosophila and the higher Diptera II. A time scale for fly evolution. J Mol Evol. 1984;21(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF02100622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carthew R. W., Rubin G. M. seven in absentia, a gene required for specification of R7 cell fate in the Drosophila eye. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):561–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90452-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowman A. F., Zuker C. S., Rubin G. M. An opsin gene expressed in only one photoreceptor cell type of the Drosophila eye. Cell. 1986 Mar 14;44(5):705–710. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90836-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fortini M. E., Rubin G. M. Analysis of cis-acting requirements of the Rh3 and Rh4 genes reveals a bipartite organization to rhodopsin promoters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1990 Mar;4(3):444–463. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.3.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris W. A., Stark W. S., Walker J. A. Genetic dissection of the photoreceptor system in the compound eye of Drosophila melanogaster. J Physiol. 1976 Apr;256(2):415–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Helms C., Graham M. Y., Dutchik J. E., Olson M. V. A new method for purifying lambda DNA from phage lysates. DNA. 1985 Feb;4(1):39–49. doi: 10.1089/dna.1985.4.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henikoff S., Eghtedarzadeh M. K. Conserved arrangement of nested genes at the Drosophila Gart locus. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):711–725. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewontin R. C. Inferring the number of evolutionary events from DNA coding sequence differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Jan;6(1):15–32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin C. H., Meyerowitz E. M. Mosaic evolution in the Drosophila genome. Bioessays. 1988 Aug-Sep;9(2-3):65–69. doi: 10.1002/bies.950090207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin R. L., Wood C., Baehr W., Applebury M. L. Visual pigment homologies revealed by DNA hybridization. Science. 1986 Jun 6;232(4755):1266–1269. doi: 10.1126/science.3010467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moriyama E. N., Gojobori T. Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):855–864. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nathans J. Determinants of visual pigment absorbance: role of charged amino acids in the putative transmembrane segments. Biochemistry. 1990 Jan 30;29(4):937–942. doi: 10.1021/bi00456a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nathans J., Hogness D. S. Isolation and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding human rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4851–4855. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nathans J., Piantanida T. P., Eddy R. L., Shows T. B., Hogness D. S. Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision. Science. 1986 Apr 11;232(4747):203–210. doi: 10.1126/science.3485310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. O'Tousa J. E., Baehr W., Martin R. L., Hirsh J., Pak W. L., Applebury M. L. The Drosophila ninaE gene encodes an opsin. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):839–850. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90343-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollock J. A., Benzer S. Transcript localization of four opsin genes in the three visual organs of Drosophila; RH2 is ocellus specific. Nature. 1988 Jun 23;333(6175):779–782. doi: 10.1038/333779a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Riley M. A. Nucleotide sequence of the Xdh region in Drosophila pseudoobscura and an analysis of the evolution of synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Jan;6(1):33–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sakmar T. P., Franke R. R., Khorana H. G. Glutamic acid-113 serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Nov;86(21):8309–8313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sakmar T. P., Franke R. R., Khorana H. G. The role of the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in rhodopsin in determining wavelength absorbance and Schiff base pKa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3079–3083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schaeffer S. W., Aquadro C. F. Nucleotide sequence of the Adh gene region of Drosophila pseudoobscura: evolutionary change and evidence for an ancient gene duplication. Genetics. 1987 Sep;117(1):61–73. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02603075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):222–230. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M., Higgins D. G., Wright F. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Washburn T., O'Tousa J. E. Molecular defects in Drosophila rhodopsin mutants. J Biol Chem. 1989 Sep 15;264(26):15464–15466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wolfe K. H., Sharp P. M., Li W. H. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):283–285. doi: 10.1038/337283a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yokoyama S., Yokoyama R. Molecular evolution of human visual pigment genes. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Mar;6(2):186–197. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhukovsky E. A., Oprian D. D. Effect of carboxylic acid side chains on the absorption maximum of visual pigments. Science. 1989 Nov 17;246(4932):928–930. doi: 10.1126/science.2573154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zuker C. S., Montell C., Jones K., Laverty T., Rubin G. M. A rhodopsin gene expressed in photoreceptor cell R7 of the Drosophila eye: homologies with other signal-transducing molecules. J Neurosci. 1987 May;7(5):1550–1557. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-05-01550.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES