Abstract
Reversion to Lys(+) prototrophy in a haploid yeast strain containing a defined lys2 frameshift mutation has been examined. When cells were plated on synthetic complete medium lacking only lysine, the numbers of Lys(+) revertant colonies accumulated in a time-dependent manner in the absence of any detectable increase in cell number. An examination of the distribution of the numbers of early appearing Lys(+) colonies from independent cultures suggests that the mutations to prototrophy occurred randomly during nonselective growth. In contrast, an examination of the distribution of late appearing Lys(+) colonies indicates that the underlying reversion events occurred after selective plating. No accumulation of Lys(+) revertants occurred when cells were starved for tryptophan, leucine or both lysine and tryptophan prior to plating selectively for Lys(+) revertants. These results indicate that mutations accumulate more frequently when they confer a selective advantage, and are thus consistent with the occurrence of adaptive mutations in yeast.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnes D. A., Thorner J. Genetic manipulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of the LYS2 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;6(8):2828–2838. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.8.2828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cairns J., Foster P. L. Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):695–701. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis B. D. Transcriptional bias: a non-Lamarckian mechanism for substrate-induced mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(13):5005–5009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleig U. N., Pridmore R. D., Philippsen P. Construction of LYS2 cartridges for use in genetic manipulations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1986;46(2-3):237–245. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90408-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foster P. L. Directed mutation: between unicorns and goats. J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(6):1711–1716. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.6.1711-1716.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedberg E. C. Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Mar;52(1):70–102. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.70-102.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guarente L., Mason T. Heme regulates transcription of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae via an upstream activation site. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1279–1286. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90309-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall B. G. Selection-induced mutations occur in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 15;89(10):4300–4303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall B. G. Spontaneous point mutations that occur more often when advantageous than when neutral. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korogodin V. I., Korogodina V. L., Fajszi C., Chepurnoy A. I., Mikhova-Tsenova N., Simonyan N. V. On the dependence of spontaneous mutation rates on the functional state of genes. Yeast. 1991 Feb;7(2):105–117. doi: 10.1002/yea.320070204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kramer B., Kramer W., Williamson M. S., Fogel S. Heteroduplex DNA correction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mismatch specific and requires functional PMS genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4432–4440. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenski R. E., Slatkin M., Ayala F. J. Mutation and selection in bacterial populations: alternatives to the hypothesis of directed mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2775–2778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Origin of mutants disputed. Nature. 1988 Dec 8;336(6199):525–528. doi: 10.1038/336525a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiestl R. H., Gietz R. D. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989 Dec;16(5-6):339–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00340712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:3–21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stahl F. W. Bacterial genetics. A unicorn in the garden. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):112–113. doi: 10.1038/335112a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart F. M., Gordon D. M., Levin B. R. Fluctuation analysis: the probability distribution of the number of mutants under different conditions. Genetics. 1990 Jan;124(1):175–185. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zitomer R. S., Montgomery D. L., Nichols D. L., Hall B. D. Transcriptional regulation of the yeast cytochrome c gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3627–3631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.8.3627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]