Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Oct;132(2):303–310. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.303

Sequence Analysis of Mutations Arising during Prolonged Starvation of Salmonella Typhimurium

M J Prival 1, T A Cebula 1
PMCID: PMC1205137  PMID: 1427030

Abstract

We have examined the effects of prolonged histidine deprivation on the reversion of Salmonella typhimurium histidine auxotrophs containing either hisG46, a missense mutation (CTC -> CCC), or hisG428, an ochre mutation (CAA -> TAA). Both of these mutants can revert to His(+) via intragenic and extragenic mechanisms. Whereas the hisG46 mutant site consists of G/C base pairs, extragenic suppression of hisG46 requires mutation at an A/T site. Conversely, the hisG428 site itself contains only A/T base pairs, and extragenic suppression of hisG428 occurs principally at G/C sites. Thus, by examining the mutational spectrum of hisG46 and hisG428 revertants that occurred in the presence and in the absence of histidine, it was possible to determine the effects of histidine starvation on mutations at G/C vs. A/T sites as well as on intragenic sites vs. extragenic suppressor sites. Using DNA-colony hybridization, we determined the DNA sequences of over 1300 hisG46 and hisG428 revertants. Histidine-independent revertants that arose during growth in liquid medium that contained histidine included both intragenic and extragenic suppressor mutations. The relative frequency of such extragenic suppressors was greatly reduced among the His(+) revertants that were isolated after 5-10 days of histidine starvation on agar medium. Moreover, DNA sequence analysis revealed striking differences in the distribution of particular transversions at the hisG428 locus in revertants arising after prolonged histidine starvation as compared to those arising after growth in the presence of histidine.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (882.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akiyama M., Maki H., Sekiguchi M., Horiuchi T. A specific role of MutT protein: to prevent dG.dA mispairing in DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(11):3949–3952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.11.3949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames B. N., Lee F. D., Durston W. E. An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):782–786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ames B. N., Mccann J., Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1975 Dec;31(6):347–364. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(75)90046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatnagar S. K., Bullions L. C., Lew G., Bessman M. J. Characterization of the defect in the Escherichia coli mutT1 mutator gene. J Bacteriol. 1990 May;172(5):2802–2803. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.5.2802-2803.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cairns J., Foster P. L. Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):695–701. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns J., Overbaugh J., Miller S. The origin of mutants. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):142–145. doi: 10.1038/335142a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foster P. L. Directed mutation: between unicorns and goats. J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(6):1711–1716. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.6.1711-1716.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall B. G. Adaptive evolution that requires multiple spontaneous mutations: mutations involving base substitutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 1;88(13):5882–5886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.13.5882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall B. G. Spontaneous point mutations that occur more often when advantageous than when neutral. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Komine Y., Adachi T., Inokuchi H., Ozeki H. Genomic organization and physical mapping of the transfer RNA genes in Escherichia coli K12. J Mol Biol. 1990 Apr 20;212(4):579–598. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90224-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kupchella E., Cebula T. A. Analysis of Salmonella typhimurium hisD3052 revertants: the use of oligodeoxyribonucleotide colony hybridization, PCR, and direct sequencing in mutational analysis. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1991;18(4):224–230. doi: 10.1002/em.2850180404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LEDERBERG J., LEDERBERG E. M. Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants. J Bacteriol. 1952 Mar;63(3):399–406. doi: 10.1128/jb.63.3.399-406.1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levin D. E., Ames B. N. Classifying mutagens as to their specificity in causing the six possible transitions and transversions: a simple analysis using the Salmonella mutagenicity assay. Environ Mutagen. 1986;8(1):9–28. doi: 10.1002/em.2860080103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maki H., Sekiguchi M. MutT protein specifically hydrolyses a potent mutagenic substrate for DNA synthesis. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):273–275. doi: 10.1038/355273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stahl F. W. Bacterial genetics. A unicorn in the garden. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):112–113. doi: 10.1038/335112a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. VOGEL H. J., BONNER D. M. Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1956 Jan;218(1):97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES