Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Oct;132(2):387–402. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.387

Sister Chromatids Are Preferred over Homologs as Substrates for Recombinational Repair in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

L C Kadyk 1, L H Hartwell 1
PMCID: PMC1205144  PMID: 1427035

Abstract

A diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain was constructed in which the products of both homolog recombination and unequal sister chromatid recombination events could be selected. This strain was synchronized in G(1) or in G(2), irradiated with X-rays to induce DNA damage, and monitored for levels of recombination. Cells irradiated in G(1) were found to repair recombinogenic damage primarily by homolog recombination, whereas those irradiated in G(2) repaired such damage preferentially by sister chromatid recombination. We found, as have others, that G(1) diploids were much more sensitive to the lethal effects of X-ray damage than were G(2) diploids, especially at higher doses of irradiation. The following possible explanations for this observation were tested: G(2) cells have more potential templates for repair than G(1) cells; G(2) cells are protected by the RAD9-mediated delay in G(2) following DNA damage; sister chromatids may share more homology than homologous chromosomes. All these possibilities were ruled out by appropriate tests. We propose that, due to a special relationship they share, sister chromatids are not only preferred over homologous chromatids as substrates for recombinational repair, but have the capacity to repair more DNA damage than do homologs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahn B. Y., Dornfeld K. J., Fagrelius T. J., Livingston D. M. Effect of limited homology on gene conversion in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid recombination system. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;8(6):2442–2448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.6.2442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailis A. M., Rothstein R. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):535–547. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunborg G., Resnick M. A., Williamson D. H. Cell-cycle-specific repair of DNA double strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat Res. 1980 Jun;82(3):547–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunborg G., Williamson D. H. The relevance of the nuclear division cycle to radiosensitivity in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Jul 4;162(3):277–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00268853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Esposito M. S. Evidence that spontaneous mitotic recombination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4436–4440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Esposito R. E. Genetic recombination in synchronized cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1968 Jun;59(2):191–210. doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.2.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fabre F., Boulet A., Roman H. Gene conversion at different points in the mitotic cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(1-2):139–143. doi: 10.1007/BF00332736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fabre F. Induced intragenic recombination in yeast can occur during the G1 mitotic phase. Nature. 1978 Apr 27;272(5656):795–798. doi: 10.1038/272795a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fasullo M. T., Davis R. W. Direction of chromosome rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of his3 recombinational substrates. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;8(10):4370–4380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.10.4370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitzgerald-Hayes M., Clarke L., Carbon J. Nucleotide sequence comparisons and functional analysis of yeast centromere DNAs. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):235–244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90108-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Freifelder D. Rate of production of single-strand breaks in DNA by x-irradiation in situ. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jul 28;35(2):303–309. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(68)80026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Friis J., Roman H. The effect of the mating-type alleles on intragenic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1968 May;59(1):33–36. doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Golin J. E., Esposito M. S. Mitotic recombination: mismatch correction and replicational resolution of Holliday structures formed at the two strand stage in Saccharomyces. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;183(2):252–263. doi: 10.1007/BF00270626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwell L. H. Macromolecule synthesis in temperature-sensitive mutants of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1967 May;93(5):1662–1670. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.5.1662-1670.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hatzfeld J., Williamson D. H. Cell-cycle dependent changes in sensitivity to gamma-rays in synchronously dividing yeast culture. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Mar 15;84(1):431–435. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90426-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henikoff S. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III in DNA sequence analysis. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:156–165. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hsu Y. P., Schimmel P. Yeast LEU1. Repression of mRNA levels by leucine and relationship of 5'-noncoding region to that of LEU2. J Biol Chem. 1984 Mar 25;259(6):3714–3719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):306–311. doi: 10.1038/292306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. James A P. A Genetic Analysis of Sectoring in Ultraviolet-Induced Variant Colonies of Yeast. Genetics. 1955 Mar;40(2):204–213. doi: 10.1093/genetics/40.2.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones E. W. Bipartite structure of the ade3 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1977 Feb;85(2):209–223. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.2.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keil R. L., Roeder G. S. Cis-acting, recombination-stimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):377–386. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kupiec M., Petes T. D. Allelic and ectopic recombination between Ty elements in yeast. Genetics. 1988 Jul;119(3):549–559. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.3.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lichten M., Haber J. E. Position effects in ectopic and allelic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Oct;123(2):261–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lovett S. T., Mortimer R. K. Characterization of null mutants of the RAD55 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of temperature, osmotic strength and mating type. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):547–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.4.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MORTIMER R. K. Radiobiological and genetic studies on a polyploid series (haploid to hexaploid) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat Res. 1958 Sep;9(3):312–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McKenzie K. Q., Jones E. W. Mutants of formyltetrahydrofolate interconversion pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1977 May;86(1):85–102. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nasmyth K. A., Tatchell K. The structure of transposable yeast mating type loci. Cell. 1980 Mar;19(3):753–764. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(80)80051-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Neitz M., Carbon J. Characterization of a centromere-linked recombination hot spot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;7(11):3871–3879. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.11.3871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Newlon C. S., Lipchitz L. R., Collins I., Deshpande A., Devenish R. J., Green R. P., Klein H. L., Palzkill T. G., Ren R. B., Synn S. Analysis of a circular derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III: a physical map and identification and location of ARS elements. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):343–357. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. PONTECORVO G., KAFER E. Genetic analysis based on mitotic recombination. Adv Genet. 1958;9:71–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Prakash S., Prakash L., Burke W., Montelone B. A. Effects of the RAD52 Gene on Recombination in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. Genetics. 1980 Jan;94(1):31–50. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. ROMAN H., JACOB F. A comparison of spontaneous and ultraviolet-induced allelic recombination with reference to the recombination of outside markers. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:155–160. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1958.023.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. ROMAN H. Studies of gene mutation in Saccharomyces. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1956;21:175–185. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Resnick M. A., Martin P. The repair of double-strand breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Jan 16;143(2):119–129. doi: 10.1007/BF00266917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Roeder G. S., Smith M., Lambie E. J. Intrachromosomal movement of genetically marked Saccharomyces cerevisiae transposons by gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;4(4):703–711. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.4.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saeki T., Machida I., Nakai S. Genetic control of diploid recovery after gamma-irradiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1980 Dec;73(2):251–265. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Seifert H. S., Chen E. Y., So M., Heffron F. Shuttle mutagenesis: a method of transposon mutagenesis for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(3):735–739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shen P., Huang H. V. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Skogerson L., McLaughlin C., Wakatama E. Modification of ribosomes in cryptopleurine-resistant mutants of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1973 Nov;116(2):818–822. doi: 10.1128/jb.116.2.818-822.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smolik-Utlaut S., Petes T. D. Recombination of plasmids into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome is reduced by small amounts of sequence heterogeneity. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;3(7):1204–1211. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.7.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Staben C., Rabinowitz J. C. Nucleotide sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADE3 gene encoding C1-tetrahydrofolate synthase. J Biol Chem. 1986 Apr 5;261(10):4629–4637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stern C. Somatic Crossing over and Segregation in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1936 Nov;21(6):625–730. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.6.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Szostak J. W., Wu R. Unequal crossing over in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1980 Apr 3;284(5755):426–430. doi: 10.1038/284426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5350–5357. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wildenberg J. The relation of mitotic recombination to DNA replication in yeast pedigrees. Genetics. 1970 Oct;66(2):291–304. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.2.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu C. T., Goldberg M. L. The Drosophila zeste gene and transvection. Trends Genet. 1989 Jun;5(6):189–194. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. van Solingen P., van der Plaat J. B. Fusion of yeast spheroplasts. J Bacteriol. 1977 May;130(2):946–947. doi: 10.1128/jb.130.2.946-947.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES