Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322610

Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach

Tsion Mulat Tebeje 1,*, Mihret Fikreyesus 2, Temesgen Leka Lerango 1, Daniel Sisay 1
Editor: Daniele Romanello3
PMCID: PMC12052162  PMID: 40324003

Abstract

Background

Hypertension often goes undetected for years because its initial symptoms are usually subtle and easily overlooked. Undiagnosed hypertension is a significant contributor to the onset of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and overall mortality. Although its prevalence increases with age, few studies have investigated the factors associated with undiagnosed hypertension in older adults. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors influencing undiagnosed hypertension among older adults in the Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia.

Methods

A study design incorporating a community-based cross-sectional study and qualitative inquiry as a complementary approach was carried out among 609 randomly selected older adults in the Gedeo zone from March 19 to May 20, 2023. A binary logistic regression model assessed the relationships between the outcome and explanatory variables, with statistical significance set at a p-value of < 0.05. The qualitative data were transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed using Open Code version 4.03.

Results

The prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension among older adults was 39.24% (95% CI: 35.43%, 43.19%). The determinants that were found to have a significant relationship with undiagnosed hypertension were living in urban areas (AOR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.83), being able to read and write (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.38), attending primary education and above (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.87), not having a health seeking behavior (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.43), being overweight or obese (AOR = 4.50, 95% CI: 2.74, 7.39), having chronic diseases (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.66), and having a family history of hypertension (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.13, 3.21).

Conclusion

Our findings showed that about four out of 10 older adults in the Gedeo zone have had undiagnosed hypertension. This highlights the need for a comprehensive and precise screening program for these vulnerable population. In-depth interviews revealed that television programs and healthcare providers were major sources of information regarding hypertension and its prevention methods. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize preventive interventions and develop appropriate programs focused on older adults. In particular, people with chronic diseases and a family history of hypertension should be taught and encouraged to undergo timely checkups.

Introduction

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are widely recognized as major hindrances to socioeconomic progress on a global scale [1]. In 2019, NCDs constituted seven out of the top ten leading causes of death worldwide, marking a substantial increase compared to that in the year 2000, when only four of the top ten diseases, including hypertension and diabetes, were classified as non-communicable [1,2]. Hypertension, also referred to as high blood pressure, is a chronic medical condition characterized by increased blood pressure in the arteries. This condition forces the heart to exert more effort than normal to pump blood through vessels [3].

The number of individuals aged 30–79 with hypertension grew from 648 million to 1.28 billion between 1990 and 2019, with a prevalence of 32% in women and 34% in men. Even though the treatment and control rates of hypertension have been improved, Oceania, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) showed the lowest rates of detection, treatment, and control. In SSA, 52% of women and 66% of men are undiagnosed yet hypertensive [4]. The pooled prevalence of hypertension in Africa among adults aged 50 years or above was 57%, ranging from 53% in western Africa to 78% in southern Africa [5].

Hypertension is a prominent contributor to global mortality. According to 2016 Global Health Observatory data from the WHO, high blood pressure accounts for approximately 7.5 million deaths annually, accounting for approximately 12.8% of all deaths. Furthermore, this translates to 57 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), representing 3.7% of the total DALYs [6]. Hypertension is a common chronic disease among elderly people, and the risk increases with age, with a prevalence of 22.4%, 54.5%, and 74.5% among those aged 18–39, 40–59 and 60 and above, respectively [7].

Individuals with undiagnosed hypertension are hypertensive but have not been informed by a healthcare professional about their condition [8]. It is an issue in both developed and developing nations and contributes up to 27% of the increasing burden of cardiovascular disease in SSA [9]. Only 10% of individuals had successfully managed to control their hypertension in low- and middle-income countries [10].

Undiagnosed hypertension significantly increases the risk of complications, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, renal failure, stroke, and premature death [1113]. It has serious health and financial consequences; older people are disproportionately affected by high blood pressure, a recognized cardiovascular disease risk factor [14,15]. Early detection and diagnosis are therefore essential for managing hypertension; however, in poor nations such as Ethiopia, the majority of populations are ignorant of their condition, leading to undiagnosed, untreated, and unregulated hypertension [16]. A study in India showed that those aged above 50 years have a six-fold greater risk of undiagnosed hypertension [17]. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in Ethiopia, older individuals were at increased risk of undiagnosed hypertension [18].

In Ethiopia, among adults aged 30–79 years, 27.4% are hypertensive. Of which only 37.4% of women and 30.1% of men are diagnosed, only 15.6% of women and 15.6% of men are treated, and only 6.6% of women and 5.6% of men are controlled [4]. The design of hypertension interventions in Ethiopia ignores the greater population of hypertensive persons who are not diagnosed, focusing primarily on those who have been diagnosed. Given that many people with hypertension are likely to be misdiagnosed, this might have major repercussions for the nation.

Chronic diseases have a greater impact on older adults, as they are both more prevalent and more detrimental in this age group [19]. For example, as per a study in Southern Africa, chronic diseases are more frequent among adults aged 50 and beyond than among the younger population aged 18–49 [20]. NCDs, including hypertension, are responsible for the death of 41 million people globally, of these 17 million people die before age 70 [21]. The longstanding effect of hazardous health practices and current health choices increases the risk of developing a chronic illness in older age [22,23]. Yet, little is known about the prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed hypertension among adults aged 50 years and above.

Although undiagnosed hypertension is common in older adults, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted in Ethiopia focusing on this population. Additionally, by supplementing this study with a qualitative approach, contextual factors from the perspective of elderly people can be explored. The outcomes of this study will help institutions develop appropriate hypertension disease plans and interventions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the burden and associated factors of undiagnosed hypertension among older adults by using a mixed approach in the Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study area, design, and period

The study was carried out in the Gedeo Zone, which is located in the southern region of Ethiopia. 360 km from the capital of Addis Ababa. The zone encompasses 5,890.2 km2 in total. There are five town administrations (Dilla town, Yirgachefe, Gedeb, Wonago, and Chelelektu) and eight districts (Wonago, Repe, Yirgacheeffe, Chorso, Bule, Kochire, Dilla zuriya, and Gedeb woredas) in the zone. With a crude population density of 774 people per square kilometer, the Gedeo zone has 1,226,779 people living in it overall, with a population of 107,312 elderly people. The Gedeo Zone Health Department reported that there were 250,363 households in the zone as of 2021. A cross-sectional study based in the community was carried out from March 19 to May 20, 2023, which was further supplemented with a qualitative study.

Population

The source population was all older adults aged 50 years and older living in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia. Older adults aged 50 years and older living in Gedeo zone who were randomly selected at the time of the study period composed the study population (S1 Dataset). The study included older adults who had resided in the study area for a minimum of six months before the survey, while those with a history of hypertension and severe medical conditions or mental illness were excluded.

Sample size and sampling procedure

The single population proportion formula was used to calculate the sample size at a confidence level of 1.96 and a margin of error of 5%. We considered 50% of the population proportion (p), as there has been no previously conducted research on the prevalence and associated factors of undiagnosed hypertension among older adults in Ethiopia. Then, by taking the 1.5 design effect into account and adding a 10% nonresponse rate, the final sample size became 633 (S1 File). For the qualitative study, the data was saturated when the number of participants reached 13.

A multistage sampling technique was utilized to select the study subjects (older adults). Among the zone’s five city administrations and eight districts, two districts (Dilla Zuria and Wonago woreda) and one city administration (Dilla town) were selected randomly. Then, a total of fourteen kebeles were chosen from each designated county by the lottery method to obtain 30% of the kebeles in that county. Households from each kebele were chosen proportionately according to the number of households in each chosen kebele using lists of kebeles and the number of households from zone and district officials (Fig 1). Then, systematic random sampling was conducted to select the study households. By dividing the total number of households in a particular kebele by the necessary number of participants, the selection interval (k) was established. One house was randomly selected from each selected kebele as a starting household. The next step involved selecting households at regular intervals or every kth household as per the sampling fraction until the final household assigned to each kebele was chosen. If an eligible candidate was not found in a selected household, the sampling proceeded clockwise to the next household until an eligible person was identified. If there was more than one eligible person aged 50 and above in the selected household, one of them was randomly selected as a study participant.

Fig 1. Schematic representation of the sampling technique to select older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia.

Fig 1

Study variables

The outcome variable, undiagnosed hypertension, was dichotomized into two groups: yes and no. The explanatory variables used in this study were residence, educational status, occupation, sex, marital status, household monthly income, family history of hypertension, age, khat chewing, physical exercise, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidities, obesity, knowledge, and health-seeking behavior related to hypertension.

Measurements

First, we made sure that all participants avoided smoking cigarettes, consuming alcohol, or ingesting caffeine, and waited for 30 minutes before their blood pressure was measured. This waiting period ensured their eligibility for the blood pressure measurement, as it was verified that they had refrained from consuming anything within the last half hour. Moreover, participants were instructed to empty their bladders and abstain from drinking water before the measurement. Upon entering the measurement room, participants were asked to sit in a chair with their feet flat on the floor and their backs supported for 3 minutes before the first blood pressure reading was taken [24]. Blood pressure was measured while the participants were in a sitting position using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. The measurement was taken from the right arm, and an appropriate cuff size was used, ensuring that it covered at least two-thirds of the upper arm. Two measurements were made 5 minutes apart. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured in accordance with the WHO guidelines. A systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement equal to or greater than 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurement equal to or greater than 90 mmHg were used to diagnose hypertension [25]. The participant was considered undiagnosed if the person had hypertension but did not disclose receiving a diagnosis from a medical expert.

An electronic scale or balance was used to measure weight, and a standing posture was used to assess height. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight of adults in kilograms divided by their height in meters squared. A BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 was classified as underweight, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 as normal, 25-29.9 kg/m2 as overweight, and 30 kg/m2 or more as obese [26].

An individual was classified as having a family history of hypertension if they had a first-degree relative diagnosed and/or medicated for the condition [27]. Comorbid disease is a chronic illness with a verified diagnosis of a condition other than hypertension [28].

Engaging in physical activity for 20–30 minutes, three days a week is considered regular physical exercise [29]. The definition of current alcohol use was any amount or kind of alcohol consumed within a year before the study. An adult who had smoked cigarettes within a year before the study was referred to as a current smoker [30]. Regular khat chewing refers to chewing khat at least once a week for the previous year or longer [31].

Health-seeking behavior was defined as follows: “yes” when they claimed to visit modern health institutions (private clinics, hospitals, and health centers), “yes” when any household member was sick, or “no” otherwise [32].

Knowledge about hypertension: Knowledge of risk factors for HTN was measured by 11 items, 5 items assessed knowledge of HTN symptoms, 3 items examined knowledge of HTN complications, and 2 items rated knowledge of HTN medical treatment. Each right response received a score of one, while wrong and I Do Not Know responses received a score of zero. This created a range of 0–21 for the overall knowledge score. According to the guidelines provided by the instrument, a total knowledge percentage score of at least 70% (≥14.7 out of 21) denotes appropriate knowledge, whereas a score of less than 70% (≤14.7 out of 21) denotes inadequate knowledge. The internal consistency of the original questionnaire was 0.70 [33].

Data collection tools, procedures, and quality assurance

The data collection process involved conducting face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by drawing from various previously conducted studies and the literature. It was then adapted to suit the specific local context of the study area. The interviews aimed to gather information related to the sociodemographic status, behavioral factors, and knowledge of the study participants. It was initially written in English, and for the purpose of collecting the data, a language expert translated it into Amharic and Gedeo’ffa. The questionnaire was then translated back into English by a different language specialist to ensure uniformity.

We used KoboCollect to collect the data in this study. For data collection, 14 health extension workers and for supervision three nurses were selected. A comprehensive three-day training program was conducted to equip data collectors and supervisors with the necessary skills and knowledge regarding the overall field survey techniques, interviewing approach, measurement, steps, and process of data collection. To ensure the reliability of the data collection tools, a pretest was conducted on 5% of the total sample size in Bule Woreda 01 Kebele. This was carried out two weeks before the actual data collection period. Additionally, the principal investigator and supervisors provided daily feedback and corrections to the data collectors before they were deployed to the field the following day.

Using a semistructured interview guide, in-depth interviews (IDIs) were used to gather qualitative data. For individuals who were eligible, the purpose of the research was described. After that, the interviewers purposefully selected the participants and included them in the IDI. The population for the qualitative study was a subset of elderly individuals living in randomly selected kebeles who were not hypertensive after blood pressure measurement. Thirteen IDIs were conducted with them to understand their perceptions of the knowledge and prevention of hypertension. We obtained written informed consent from each subject. During each session of the IDIs, the conversations were recorded using a phone recorder. In addition, keynotes were taken to capture important points and details. The interviews took place in a private room that was specifically arranged to provide comfort and confidentiality for the participants.

Data management and analysis

The data analysis was conducted using STATA version 17, a statistical software package, to process and analyze the collected data. The data were cleaned, encoded, and recoded. Appropriate descriptive statistics, such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, were employed to examine the distribution of the data and provide a comprehensive summary. To investigate the determinants of undiagnosed hypertension, we utilized a binary logistic regression model. Initially, a bi-variable binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify variables that were eligible for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. Variables with a p-value less than 0.20 in the bi-variable analysis were considered potential candidates for the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were deemed to be statistically significant predictors. The results are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios, accompanied by their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multicollinearity, which is the presence of high intercorrelations between independent variables in the multiple regression model, was assessed and quantified by the variance inflation factor (VIF). All variables demonstrated VIF values below 10, with a mean VIF of 1.91, indicating that multicollinearity was not a significant concern in the analysis.

For the qualitative data, all recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim into the local language Amharic and Gedeo’ffa. Then, the questionnaire was translated into the English language. To thoroughly understand the content, we extensively reviewed the transcripts and created concise memos and codes for each line. Subsequently, we refined and compared the newly emerged themes and subthemes. The investigators engaged in daily discussions to resolve any discrepancies, incorporated new ideas from the participants, and reached a consensus on the identified themes and subthemes. For the data analysis, we utilized open code version 4.03 software, employing a thematic analysis approach that followed an inductive methodology.

Ethical consideration

This study was conducted following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The institutional review board (IRB) of Dilla University approved the study (protocol unique number: duirb/020/23–02). The survey questionnaire included comprehensive information on consent, confidentiality, and the survey’s objectives, which were communicated on the first page. Participants were informed that their involvement was voluntary and that they had the right to withdraw their participation at any time. Prior to participation, each individual provided written informed consent. Confidentiality was strictly maintained by ensuring that the collected data did not include any personal identifiers and was solely utilized for research purposes.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

We analyzed data on a total of 609 participants, for a 96.2% response rate. The mean age in the sample was 60.5 ± 10.8 years, while the majority (63.4%) were aged between 50 and 59 years. Almost half (49.1%) of the participants were men, and the other half (50.9%) were women. The vast majority of the participants (82.6%) were married. Of the total sample, 46.6% lived in rural areas, and 37.9% had attained primary education or above. Approximately 286 (44.0%) participants were unemployed, followed by private workers (24.0%). Nearly half of the participants (49.9%) were Gedeo in ethnicity, followed by Gurage and Oromo (Table 1).

Among the respondents, 322 (52.9%) chewed khat, 160 (26.3%) smoked cigarettes, 282 (46.3%) drank alcohol, and only one-third exercised physically. Regarding body mass index, more than two-thirds of the participants had a BMI < 25 kg/m2. More than half (55.2%) of the participants had health-seeking behavior, and 246 (40.4) had at least one chronic disease. Among the total sample, 84 (13.8%) reported a history of hypertension in their first-degree relative (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants in the Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023.

Variables Categories Frequency Percent (%)
Age 50-59 386 63.4
60-69 106 17.4
>=70 117 19.2
Sex Female 310 50.9
Male 299 49.1
Residence Rural 284 46.6
Urban 325 53.4
Marital status Married 503 82.6
Widowed 106 17.4
Educational status Cannot read and write 245 40.2
Can read and write 133 21.9
Primary education and above 231 37.9
Occupation Farmer 101 16.6
Unemployed 286 44.0
Private 146 24.0
Others 76 12.4
Ethnicity Gedeo 304 49.9
Gurage 116 19.1
Oromo 102 16.8
Others 87 14.3
Khat chewing Yes 322 52.9
No 287 47.1
Cigarette smoking Yes 160 26.3
No 449 73.7
Alcohol drinking Yes 282 46.3
No 327 53.7
Physical exercise Yes 188 30.9
No 421 69.1
Health seeking behavior Yes 336 55.2
No 273 44.8
Overweight and obesity Yes 205 33.7
No 404 66.3
Chronic diseases Yes 246 40.4
No 363 59.6
Family history of HTN Yes 84 13.8
No 525 86.2

Participants’ knowledge of hypertension.

Of the participants, only 192 (31.5%) were aware that alcohol use increases the risk of hypertension. Nearly one-third (201, 33.0%) of the respondents knew that the chance of developing hypertension increased when first-degree relatives had the disease. Almost half of the participants (297, 48.8%) knew that excessive intake of salt could cause hypertension. Among the respondents, 217 (35.6) were aware that symptoms of HTN are not always present, and half (50.4%) recognized that blood pressure is deemed high if it is 140/90 mmHg or above, while only 14.6% identified that blood pressure 120/80 is considered good. Only 71 (11.7%) knew that when a person has two or more increased blood pressure readings on three distinct occasions, they may be diagnosed with HTN. The vast majority of 513 (84.2%) did not know that hypertension is a life-threatening condition, and only 73 (12%) HTN cases had detrimental effects on the body by causing damage to blood vessels. Among the participants, only 122 (20.4%) people were aware that using antihypertensive drugs for an extended period of time damages the body, and 261 (42.9%) were aware that there are several kinds of these medications (S1 table).

According to the instrument, a total score of hypertension knowledge below 70% (14.7) was regarded as inadequate knowledge. Overall, 539 (88.5%) of the respondents had inadequate knowledge, while the remaining 11.5% had adequate knowledge (S1 table).

The magnitude of undiagnosed hypertension.

The study participants had mean SBP and mean DBP values of 129.8 mmHg (SD = 12.0) and 84.3 mmHg (SD = 8.2), respectively. According to this study, elderly individuals had an undiagnosed HTN incidence of 39.24% (95% CI: 35.43%, 43.19%) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia, 2023.

Fig 2

Factors associated with undiagnosed hypertension

After adjusting for the effect of confounders, the results of multivariable binary logistic regression analysis showed that educational status, place of residence, health-seeking behavior, overweight and obesity status, family history of hypertension, and the presence of at least one chronic disease were significant predictors of undiagnosed hypertension among elderly individuals. We found that elderly people who lived in urban areas (AOR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.83) had 44% lower odds of having undiagnosed hypertension than those who lived in rural areas. The odds of experiencing undiagnosed hypertension among elderly people who could read and write and attend primary education and above were reduced by 79% (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.38) and 47% (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.87), respectively, compared to elderly people who could not read and write. In contrast to elderly individuals who exhibited health-seeking behavior, those who did not have HSB had 2.26-fold (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.43) greater odds of undiagnosed hypertension. Compared to elderly individuals who were neither overweight nor obese, those who were overweight or obese were 4.5 times (AOR = 4.50, 95% CI: 2.74, 7.39) more likely to have undiagnosed hypertension. Additionally, the likelihood of undiagnosed hypertension was 72% and 90% greater for elderly individuals with chronic diseases (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.66) and a family history of hypertension (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.13, 3.21), respectively, than for their counterparts (Table 2).

Table 2. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis of factors associated with undiagnosed hypertension among elderly individuals in the Gedeo zone, 2023.

Variables Category Undiagnosed hypertension Number (%) COR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI)
Sex Female 130 (54.4) 1 1
Male 109 (45.6) 0.74 (0.57, 1.10) 1.53 (0.99, 2.34)
Residence Rural 119 (49.8) 1 1
Urban 120 (50.2) 0.81 (0.59, 1.12) 0.54 (0.34, 0.83) **
Educational status cannot read and write 112 (46.9) 1 1
can read and write 39 (16.3) 0.49 (0.31, 0.77) 0.21 (0.11, 0.38) ***
primary education and above 88 (36.8) 0.73 (0.51, 1.05) 0.53 (0.32, 0.87) *
Occupation Farmer 33 (13.8) 1 1
Unemployed 139 (58.2) 1.95 (1.21, 3.14) 1.57 (0.92, 2.67)
Private 39 (16.3) 0.75 (0.43, 1.31) 0.57 (0.31, 1.06)
Others 28 (11.7) 1.20 (0.64, 2.24) 1.38 (0.66, 2.87)
Health seeking behavior Yes 109 (45.6) 1 1
No 130 (54.4) 1.89 (1.36, 2.63) 2.26 (1.48, 3.43) ***
Overweight and Obesity No 53 (22.2) 1 1
Yes 186 (77.8) 2.45 (1.69, 3.54) 4.50 (2.74, 7.39) ***
Chronic disease No 112 (46.9) 1 1
Yes 127 (53.1) 2.39 (1.71, 3.34) 1.72 (1.11, 2.66) *
Family history No 193 (80.8) 1 1
Yes 46 (19.3) 2.08 (1.31, 3.31) 1.90 (1.13, 3.21) *
***

 < 0.001,

**

 < 0.01 and

*

 < 0.05, COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio

Qualitative results

A key informant interview was conducted, and the data were saturated when the number of participants reached 13. Eight of them were female, while the rest were male. After reading the transcripts, two themes were developed that had different subthemes.

Theme 1: Perception towards HTN.

Subtheme 1: Definition of HTN

Almost all of the participants were aware that hypertension occurred when blood vessel pressure was higher than usual. However, many are unaware of what a normal blood pressure level is. Only a few participants stated that hypertension occurs when the pressure in the blood vessel is more than 120/80. The majority of them learned about the definition of hypertension from watching health-related TV shows. Others heard about it from other friends, relatives, and coworkers who had the disease and from medical professionals. This is how one participant put it.

“Regarding my blood pressure situation…. I know the normal reading for blood pressure is 120/80, and it should not be more than that... If it is greater than this, I understand it is not a good thing. In addition, I always measure my blood pressure…I heard this from a TV show at one time.” (Participant 1, Male age 58)

Subtheme 2: Symptoms and fear of HTN

The majority of participants listed headache and dizziness as common symptoms of hypertension. In addition, they were only able to state the aforementioned symptoms. Fainting and blurred vision were mentioned as signs of high blood pressure by few of the participants. The majority of participants stated that they would be anxious to learn that they had the illness since it could lead to serious complications and require them to modify their diet and activities. They become increasingly anxious about being diagnosed with this disease, as they see the illness as causing more health issues and even death in other people. A few mentioned that it might happen to them, and since it can happen to anyone, it is nothing to be alarmed about; all they need to do is take their medication and adjust their way of living. One of the participants expressed that she would be very stressed if she were to be diagnosed with hypertension as follows:

“I lost my father ten years ago due to hypertension. I truly hate that disease…he was just fine the whole day and he got angry at night because of something and he fainted…after that, he was admitted to hospital for 10 days...the doctors said he had a stroke….he could not get out of the hospital alive…so I don’t want to be diagnosed with the disease.” (Participant 10, female 52 years)

Another participant described it as follows: “Hypertension is a silent killer. I heard from my friend, families… I don’t know what it may bring on me. So I take care of myself as much as possible.” (Participant 5, male 70 years)

Theme 2: Prevention and management of HTN.

Subtheme 1: Preventive activities

The majority of participants indicated that by engaging in various preventive activities, they could avoid hypertension. Most of them stated that as they get older, all they need to do is reduce their salt intake, stress, and exercise. Few participants claimed that cutting back on alcohol, coffee, and fatty meats would help them avoid the illness. One participant said that to avoid the disease, he must maintain his weight within a normal range for his height and age. One of the interviewees put it this way:

“I don’t know if it is scientific or not. However, I know there are three things that are said to be deadly and lead to increased blood pressure… the three white…Like salt, sugar, and fatty meat… I will control myself from these things” (Participant 6, male 65 years).

Subtheme 2: Self-management

The participants were asked what they would do if they were to be diagnosed with hypertension. They all said they needed to exercise, reduce salt, and follow the advice of health care providers. Half of the participants added that patients must adhere to health care provider’s orders and take their medication as prescribed strictly. Very few participants stated that they needed to reduce their alcohol and coffee intake, stop smoking cigarettes, and start checking their blood pressure more frequently. One participant expressed it as follows:

“It is like what I said before. By doing physical exercise and modifying one’s feeding style…avoiding different stressful things...taking things easily…people can manage high blood pressure” (participant 12, male 70 years old).

Discussion

Older adults are at increased risk of hypertension. As age increases, the vascular system undergoes changes that result in stiffening of the arteries, leading to a rise in blood pressure [34]. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of and determinants of undiagnosed hypertension among elderly people by conducting qualitative and quantitative cross-sectional studies. According to this study, 39.24% (95% CI: 35.43%, 43.19%) of the older adults had undiagnosed hypertension. In other words, close to forty percent of older adults included in this study were hypertensive but did not know about their disease. This finding is greater than those of studies performed among elderly people in Iran [35] and China [36]. The disparity could be attributed to socioeconomic differences between countries. Compared with those countries, Ethiopia has lower education, healthcare system, infrastructure, and access to medical services, which increases the magnitude of undiagnosed hypertension [37]. However, this value is lower than that reported in a study from Bangladesh [38]. This discrepancy could be explained by the difference in the scope of the study and population, as their participants were aged 35 + years.

The results of the multivariable binary logistic regression model showed that elderly individuals who lived in urban areas had a lower likelihood of having undiagnosed hypertension than those who lived in rural areas. This finding aligns with previous studies performed in India [39], China [36] and Malaysia [40]. This is because urban regions have more access to healthcare facilities than rural regions. Additionally, the inaccessibility of healthcare facilities as a result of poor transport and communication as well as the poor use of healthcare services in rural regions due to reliance on traditional medicines contributes to undiagnosed hypertension [41,42].

Consistent with previous studies [40,43,44], elderly people who can read and write and/or attend primary education have greater chances of having undiagnosed hypertension than elderly people who are unable to read and write. This shows that a low educational level is associated with a lack of awareness and limited understanding of health-related information. Few of the participants knew the scientific and correct definition of high blood pressure. They simply understand that it is an increase in blood pressure. Few participants stated that hypertension occurs when their blood pressure is greater than 120/80. They learned this from television shows, health care providers, and others around them, which is similar to the findings of a study performed in Uganda [45]. However, in Malaysia, most of the participants acquired their knowledge about hypertension from the Internet [46]. All participants identified headaches and dizziness as the most common symptoms of hypertension, with only a few participants mentioning additional symptoms such as blurred vision and fainting, similar to the findings of a study performed in Malaysia [46]. However, none of them were aware of additional symptoms such as chest pain, difficulty breathing, vomiting, nausea, or other symptoms. The majority of participants are afraid of acquiring this disease because it causes additional complications, sudden death, and lifestyle changes, similar to a study performed in Uganda [45].

It was also found that compared to elderly individuals who exhibit health-seeking behavior, those with no health-seeking behavior are at high risk of having their hypertension undiagnosed. This is corroborated by studies from Ethiopia [11,47]. The possible reason is that those who have low healthcare-seeking behavior are less likely to visit health institutions to undergo hypertension screening.

Our findings support those of studies conducted in Ethiopia [4750], which reported higher odds of undiagnosed hypertension among those who were overweight or obese. Excess body weight is closely linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and an elevated cardiovascular risk. There is a well-established association between being overweight and the activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system, leading to the development of hypertension. Neuroendocrine pathways are the main way that obesity and hypertension are related, and recent research has suggested that factors originating from adipose tissue play a significant role in this relationship [51,52].

Chronic disease was also found to have a significant influence on undiagnosed hypertension. In this regard, elderly individuals with any chronic disease had increased odds of undiagnosed hypertension. This finding was consistent with the results of previous studies [18,27,47,49]. For instance, among those with diabetes mellitus, elevated blood glucose levels can indeed cause extensive damage to blood vessels, increase fluid volume, and promote insulin resistance, all of which are key mechanisms contributing to the increased risk of hypertension [53].

Furthermore, the likelihood of undiagnosed hypertension was greater among elderly individuals with a family history of hypertension. This was in agreement with studies from Ethiopia [18,27,48], and a possible explanation might be that the greater chance of undiagnosed hypertension among those who have a family history of HTN may be linked to genetic factors that increase the risk of developing high blood pressure. The underlying genetic mechanisms are likely to involve variations in multiple genes that impact the regulation of blood pressure and cardiovascular system function [54].

The majority of participants were aware of disease prevention measures. They stated that they should exercise more, consume less salt, and avoid stress. Others stated that they needed to reduce their consumption of alcohol and cigarettes. One participant stated that maintaining a normal weight-to-height ratio is one way to prevent the disease. This finding is in line with research performed in Aksum, Ethiopia [55]. Likewise, the majority of participants stated that if they were diagnosed with hypertension, they would simply need to adjust their lifestyle based on the advice of their doctors and strictly adhere to their medication. Others stated that physical activity will help manage the disease, which is comparable to the findings of a study carried out in Uganda [45].

Strengths and limitations

The study was not without limitations. Due to its cross-sectional design, we were unable to establish cause-and-effect relationships. The notable strengths were the community-based approach, utilization of mixed study, and relatively large sample size. Additionally, standard guidelines were followed for diagnosing hypertension and assessing the other variables.

Conclusion

This study revealed that about four out of 10 older adults have had undiagnosed hypertension in Gedeo zone of Ethiopia. This showed the importance of implementing a comprehensive and precise screening program for these susceptible population. Place of residence, educational status, health-seeking behavior, overweight and obesity status, family history of hypertension, and presence of at least one chronic disease were significantly associated with undiagnosed hypertension among elderly people. Thus, given the rising number of elderly people in low-income countries like Ethiopia, it is crucial to prioritize preventive measures and creating suitable programs focused on the elderly. In particular, people with chronic diseases and a family history of hypertension need to be taught and encouraged to undergo timely checkups. It is also imperative to develop public awareness campaigns on hypertension through media channels and platforms, including radio and television programs. Furthermore, making healthy lifestyle choices should also be carefully considered, especially in the later stages of life.

Supporting information

S1 File. Sample size calculation.

(DOCX)

pone.0322610.s001.docx (19.4KB, docx)
S1 Table. Knowledge of the study participants about hypertension.

(DOCX)

pone.0322610.s002.docx (15.4KB, docx)
S1 Dataset. Primary data collected for the study.

(XLSX)

pone.0322610.s003.xlsx (334.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the data collectors and study participants.

List of abbreviations:

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

BMI

body mass index

CI

Confidence interval

DALY

disability adjusted life year

DBP

diastolic blood pressure

HTN

hypertension

IRB

institutional review board

NCD

non-communicable disease

SBP

systolic blood pressure

VIF

variance inflation factor

Data Availability

“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.”

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI) grant (grant number: R25TW011214) obtained from the US National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bollyky TJ, Templin T, Cohen M, Dieleman JL. Lower-income countries that face the most rapid shift in noncommunicable disease burden are also the least prepared. Health Aff. 2017;36(11):1866–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide: 2000-2019 [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization. Hypertension [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/hypertension [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet [Internet]. 2021;398(10304):957–80. Available from: doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bosu WK, Reilly ST, Aheto JMK, Zucchelli E. Hypertension in older adults in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization. Ghana country assessment report on ageing and health [Internet]. Geneva PP - Geneva: World Health Organization; Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/126341 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ostchega Y, Fryar CD, Nwankwo T, Nguyen DT. Hypertension prevalence among adults aged 18 and over: United States, 2017-2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2020; (364):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Choo EH, Ihm S-H, Lim S, Chang K, Seung K-B. A simple screening score for undiagnosed hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172:e465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ataklte F, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Taye B, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne AP. Burden of undiagnosed hypertension in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2015;65(2):291–8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Marcus M-E, Ebert C, Zhumadilov Z, Wesseh CS, et al. The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual-level data from 1.1 million adults. Lancet. 2019;394(10199):652–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30955-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haligamo D, Ayalew A, Genemo H, Yiriga N. Undiagnosed hypertension and its associated factors among adult people living in southern ethiopia: discovery from gunchire woreda of gurage zone. J Manag Strateg. 2021;12(4):37. doi: 10.5430/jms.v12n4p37 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Misganaw A, Melaku YA, Tessema GA, Deribew A, Deribe K, Abera SF, et al. National disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 257 diseases and injuries in Ethiopia, 1990-2015: findings from the global burden of disease study 2015. Popul Health Metr. 2017;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12963-017-0146-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tesfaye F, Byass P, Wall S. Populationbased prevalence of high blood pressure among adults in Addis Ababa: uncovering a silent epidemic. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oliveros E, Patel H, Kyung S, Fugar S, Goldberg A, Madan N, et al. Hypertension in older adults: assessment, management, and challenges. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(2):99–107. doi: 10.1002/clc.23303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):285–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mogas SB, Tesfaye T, Zewde B, Tesfaye Y, Kebede A, Tadesse M, et al. Burden of undiagnosed hypertension among adults in urban communities of southwest Ethiopia. Integr Blood Press Control. 2021;14:69–76. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S293251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Appadurai PD, Rajanayagam ARN, Asharaf RM, Govindan PP. Undiagnosed hypertension and its correlates among adults attending urban and rural health training centers in a South Indian district. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:162. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_32_23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ambaw Kassie G, Alemu A, Yosef Gebrekidan A, Asmare Adella G, Eshetu K, Wolie Asres A, et al. Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among adults in ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03300-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mugisha JO, Schatz EJ, Randell M, Kuteesa M, Kowal P, Negin J, et al. Chronic disease, risk factors and disability in adults aged 50 and above living with and without HIV: findings from the wellbeing of older people study in Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:31098. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Phaswana-Mafuya N, Peltzer K, Chirinda W, Musekiwa A, Kose Z, Hoosain E, et al. Self-reported prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases and associated factors among older adults in South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2013; 6(1);20936. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee M, Park S, Lee KS. Relationship between morbidity and health behavior in chronic diseases. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oster H, Chaves I. Effects of healthy lifestyles on chronic diseases: diet, sleep and exercise. Nutrients Switzerland. 2023; 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Muntner P, Shimbo D, Carey RM, Charleston JB, Gaillard T, Misra S, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in humans: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2019;73(5):e35–66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chobanian A V, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JLJ, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. hypertens (Dallas, Tex 1979). 2003 Dec;42(6):1206–52. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Tesfaye T, Berhanu MS, Zawdie B, Tamiru D, Tesfaye Y, Kebede A, et al. The hidden burden of diabetes mellitus in an urban community of Southwest Ethiopia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020; 13: 2925–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wachamo D, Geleta D, Woldesemayat EM. Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among adults in Hawela Tula Sub-City, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:2169–77. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S276955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu H, Chen S, Liu M, Nie H, Lu H. Comorbid chronic diseases are strongly correlated with disease severity among COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Dis. 2020;11(3):668–78. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.IPAQ - International physical activity questionnaire [Internet]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/view/ipaq/home [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia. Guidelines on clinical and programmatic management of major noncommunicable diseases. ResearchGate. 2016;(August):220. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Astatkie A, Demissie M, Berhane Y, Worku A. Prevalence of and factors associated with regular khat chewing among university students in Ethiopia. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2015;6:41–50. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S78773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Begashaw B, Tessema F, Gesesew HA. Health care seeking behavior in Southwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Han H-R, Chan K, Song H, Nguyen T, Lee J-E, Kim MT. Development and evaluation of a hypertension knowledge test for Korean hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens. 2011;13(10):750–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00497.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sri Hari TY, Sree Sudha TY, Varghese AM, Krishna Sasanka KSBS, Thangaraju P. A study of risk factors and complications in elderly hypertensive subjects. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021;10(6). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jfmpc/fulltext/2021/10060/a_study_of_risk_factors_and_complications_in.18.aspx [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Seyed Reza SR, Bayani M, Zabihi A, Shakerian M, Habibian T, Bijani A. Undiagnosed hypertension and diabetes among the elderly in Amirkola, North of Iran. Casp J Intern Med. 2019;10(3):303–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhou J, Fang S. Association between undiagnosed hypertension and health factors among middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(7):1214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eregata GT, Hailu A, Memirie ST, Norheim OF. Measuring progress towards universal health coverage: national and subnational analysis in Ethiopia. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(6):e001843. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ahmed S, Tariqujjaman M, Rahman MA, Hasan MZ, Hasan MM. Inequalities in the prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension among Bangladeshi adults: evidence from a nationwide survey. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0930-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boro B, Banerjee S. Decomposing the rural-urban gap in the prevalence of undiagnosed, untreated and under-treated hypertension among older adults in India. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1310. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13664-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lim OW, Yong CC. The risk factors for undiagnosed and known hypertension among Malaysians. Malays J Med Sci. 2019;26(5):98–112. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.5.9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dey S, Nambiar D, Josyula L, Sheikh K, Reddy KS. Health of the elderly in India: Challenges of access and affordability. In: Aging in Asia: findings from new and emerging data initiatives. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boro B, Saikia N. A qualitative study of the barriers to utilizing healthcare services among the tribal population in Assam. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0240096. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zacher M. Educational disparities in hypertension prevalence and blood pressure percentiles in the health and retirement study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023;78(9):1535–44. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bushara SO, Noor SK, Elmadhoun WM, Sulaiman AA, Ahmed MH. Undiagnosed hypertension in a rural community in Sudan and association with some features of the metabolic syndrome: how serious is the situation? Ren Fail. 2015;37(6):1022–6. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1052951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lynch HM, Green AS, Clarke NR, Gadikota-Klumpers DD, Squires A, Schwartz JI, et al. Exploring patient experiences with and attitudes towards hypertension at a private hospital in Uganda: a qualitative study. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):206. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1109-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tan CS, Hassali MA, Neoh CF, Saleem F. A qualitative exploration of hypertensive patients’ perception towards quality use of medication and hypertension management at the community level. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017;15(4):1074. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.04.1074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Regea F, Birhanu A, Shibiru A. Distribution of risks and prevalence of unscreened hypertension among adults living in rural of Dano District, West Shewa, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2020: community based cross-sectional study. Clin Epidemiol Glob Heal. 2022;13:100908. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398421002165 [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Essa E, Shitie D, Yirsaw MT, Wale MZ. Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among adults in Debre Markos town, North-West Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. SAGE open Med. 2022;10:20503121221094224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ayalew TL, Wale BG, Zewudie BT. Burden of undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among adult populations in Wolaita Sodo Town, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02733-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Elias S, Dadi TK. Prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among adults in Mizan-Aman Town, Bench Sheko Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Adv Med. 2023; 2023:2746284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Limpijankit T, Vathesatogkit P, Matchariyakul D, Wiriyatanakorn S, Siriyotha S, Thakkinstian A, et al. Causal relationship of excess body weight on cardiovascular events through risk factors. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08812-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ashraf MJ, Baweja P. Obesity: the “huge” problem in cardiovascular diseases. Mo Med. 2013;110(6):499–504. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cheung BMY, Li C. Diabetes and hypertension: is there a common metabolic pathway? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012;14(2):160–6. doi: 10.1007/s11883-012-0227-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu M, He Y, Jiang B, Wang J, Wu L, Wang Y, et al. Association between family history and hypertension among chinese elderly. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2015;94(48). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2015/12010/association_between_family_history_and.27.aspx [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gebrihet TA, Mesgna KH, Gebregiorgis YS, Kahsay AB, Weldehaweria NB, Weldu MG. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension is low among adults in Aksum town, northern Ethiopia: a sequential quantitative-qualitative study. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Amanuel Yoseph

5 Sep 2024

PONE-D-24-27240The hidden burden of hypertension-undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among elderly individuals in Gedeo zone: A mixed methods approachPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tebeje,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 20 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Amanuel Yoseph, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This research was supported by a Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI) grant (grant number: R25TW011214) obtained from the US National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“We would like to acknowledge the HEPI initiative for providing funds to conduct this study.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“This research was supported by a Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI) grant (grant number: R25TW011214) obtained from the US National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

I critically reviewed your article entitled “The hidden burden of hypertension-undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among elderly individuals in Gedeo zone: A mixed methods approach” which has the potential to add to the existing body of scientific knowledge, particularly in developing countries. However, there are some limitations in your article that need addressing before publication.

1. There are several grammatical and typological errors that authors need to carefully review.

2. Authors should extensively format manuscripts based on PLOS ONE journal style, including file naming. Avoid unnecessary italicizing and capitalization throughout the manuscript.

3. Make sure that your reference contains all the necessary details and PLOS ONE style.

Decision: Major revision

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you the authors working on the so called silent killer of undiagnosed hypertension.This is a prospective study so that what was the difficulty of getting consent from each indiviadual or what does it mean for publication consent is not applicable?....exclusion criteria?,operational definition? some editting of language/expert involvement is better to be involved

Reviewer #2: The study is good for the body of knowledge and abstract and introduction was written in a clear , concise and intelligible manner.

• The title should be modified to be clear

. what is your background to say elderly 50 years or above? there is other age classification for elderly population

. Does the the district (3) selected for the study is representative for the Gedeo zone (13)?

. Data management and analysis should be concise, clear and precise Eg. VIF and multicollinearity.

. For qualitative study what types of analysis method used? what does it mean thematic content analysis, it vague and not clear, please specify it. it creates mislead to qualitative result interpretation. in addition the qualitative result interpretation should be consistent/matched with analysis method.

. what the qualitative study result support? please put the qualitative result in appropriate place

. Please check the study for grammar and plagiarized content?

.Majority (63.4%) of the study participants were age between 50 to 59 years, this classified as middle age adult. does it can say elder?

. what is the sample size for second objective?

. undiagnosed HTN is new so it is possible to say prevalence of undiagnosed HTN?

Why did you merge overweight and obesity? The degree of being obese and being overweight is different and could have different impacts.

• Study period: replace the phrase “between March 19 and May 20, 2023” with “from March 19 to May 20, 2023”

• Regarding measurement of the dependent variable, two measurements were taken 5 minutes apart. I don’t think 5 minutes are enough to diagnose a patient with hypertension. Whenever possible, the diagnosis should not be made on a single office visit.

• Before measuring the blood pressure, have you addressed the protocols to measure blood pressure? For example, how do you assesses the participants to avoid smoking, caffeine and exercise for 30 min; empty bladder; remain seated and relaxed for 3–5 min? Nothing is written in this case as it could have impact on the result. Additionally, was the room Quiet with comfortable temperature?

• Regular physical activity was defined as Moderate intensity aerobic exercise (walking, jogging, cycling, yoga, or swimming) for 30 minutes on 5–7 days per week but in your case it is “Engaging in physical activity for 20–30 minutes, three days a week, is considered regular physical exercise”

Reviewer #3: Although the manuscript is good, I have several criticisms. thus you'll attempt to review and edit in light of the feedback.

I made to attach all comments in PDF format. concept, data analysis, and following the rules when writing the manuscript are some of those.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Wasihun Kindalem Work

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-24-27240_reviewer.pdf

pone.0322610.s004.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
Attachment

Submitted filename: Comment.pdf

pone.0322610.s005.pdf (120KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322610.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


28 Oct 2024

Subject: Responses to comments

Dear Editor,

Thank you for taking the time to consider our manuscript titled “Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach” for the Plos One Journal original research article. We appreciate the time and effort you and the reviewers have dedicated to providing valuable feedback on our manuscript.

We have considered the comments and concerns and made every effort to address them. We agree with all the comments and have incorporated the corresponding revisions into the revised manuscript. All revised texts are track-changed to point out the changes we made. We believe that our manuscript has been significantly improved as a result of these revisions.

We would like to thank you once again for your consideration of our work and for inviting us to submit the revised manuscript. We look forward to hearing from you. Our detailed, point-by-point responses to the comments are given below.

Best regards,

Tsion Mulat Tebeje

School of Public Health, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.

Email: yemarina12@gmail.com / Tsionmulat@du.edu.et (corresponding author)

Response to journal’s requirements

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: We prepared the manuscript according to the journal's requirements and double-checked its compliance before submitting our revised manuscript.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This research was supported by a Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI) grant (grant number: R25TW011214) obtained from the US National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: Thank you for asking about the role of the funder. We have included the role of funder statement in the cover letter.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“We would like to acknowledge the HEPI initiative for providing funds to conduct this study.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“This research was supported by a Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI) grant (grant number: R25TW011214) obtained from the US National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: We removed any funding-related text from the revised manuscript. We included the funding statement and role of funder statement in the cover letter.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly.

Response: Thank you. We included a caption of the supplementary files at the end of the revised manuscript.

Edits requested on the submission

1. Thank you for uploading your study's underlying data set in the Supporting Information file "dataset.xlsx". We noticed that this file may contain potentially identifying participant information.

Before we proceed, we kindly ask that you please ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent and all applicable local laws. If any data shared is not in accordance with participant consent, please remove these data and re-upload a fully anonymized data set. Please also note that spreadsheet columns with identifying information must be removed and not hidden as all hidden columns will appear in the published file.

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. The shared dataset does not contain any potentially identifying participant information such as names, addresses, images, or other unique identifiers. The dataset is fully anonymized. Additionally, the dataset aligns with participants’ consent agreements.

Additional Editor Comments:

I critically reviewed your article entitled “The hidden burden of hypertension-undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among elderly individuals in Gedeo zone: A mixed methods approach” which has the potential to add to the existing body of scientific knowledge, particularly in developing countries. However, there are some limitations in your article that need addressing before publication.

Response: Dear editor, Thank you for giving us your valuable time and for sharing your valuable input.

1. There are several grammatical and typological errors that authors need to carefully review.

Response: Thank you. The revised manuscript has been meticulously edited and proofread to rectify quality issues, such as misspellings, grammatical errors, and unclear sentences.

2. Authors should extensively format manuscripts based on PLOS ONE journal style, including file naming. Avoid unnecessary italicizing and capitalization throughout the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We prepared the revised manuscript according to the PLOS ONE requirements

3. Make sure that your reference contains all the necessary details and PLOS ONE style.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have made sure the references fulfill the PLOS ONE guideline in the revised manuscript.

Response to reviewer’s comments

Comments from Reviewer 1

1. Thank you the authors working on the so called silent killer of undiagnosed hypertension.

Response: Thank you for giving us your valuable time to review our paper and for your comments and suggestions, which we got as valuable input to improve the manuscript.

2. This is a prospective study so that what was the difficulty of getting consent from each indiviadual or what does it mean for publication consent is not applicable?....

Response: Thank you. We did not face any difficulty obtaining consent, we got written consent from our participants as we explained in the ethical consideration section. We mentioned publication consent is not applicable because there was no personal identifier data or imaging that required publication consent.

3. exclusion criteria?,operational definition?

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were incorporated in the population section of the methods. Highlighted in Page 6, Line 113-116. We already included operational definition as “measurements” Page 8-10, Line 146-185.

4. some editting of language/expert involvement is better to be involved

Response: Thank you. We have edited the revised manuscript to rectify misspellings, grammatical errors, and unclear sentences.

Comments from Reviewer 2

1. The study is good for the body of knowledge and abstract and introduction was written in a clear , concise and intelligible manner.

Response: Thank you for giving us your valuable time to review our paper and for your comments and suggestions, which we got as valuable input to improve the manuscript.

2. The title should be modified to be clear

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We modified the title to “Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach”.

3. what is your background to say elderly 50 years or above? there is other age classification for elderly population

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. Including hypertension, chronic diseases are more common among older adults (adults aged 50 and above). As proved by previous studies, the incidence of hypertension and other chronic illnesses increases as individuals age. Additionally, many studies in Africa used the age of 50 and above to define older adults. We have clearly explained the rationale for using these populations in the introduction section of the revised manuscript, page 5, lines 83-90. This study aims to measure undiagnosed hypertension among older adults who have been overlooked in previous studies. To ensure consistency, the term "elderly population" in the title was modified to "older adults".

4. Does the the district (3) selected for the study is representative for the Gedeo zone (13)?

Response: Thank you. As per the information we obtained from Gedeo zone administration, all the mentioned districts and town administrations belong to the Gedeo zone, which makes them representative of the zone.

5. Data management and analysis should be concise, clear and precise Eg. VIF and multicollinearity.

Response: Thank you. We rewrote the multicollinearity and VIF more clearly in the revised manuscript. Page 11-12, Lines 226-229.

6. For qualitative study what types of analysis method used? what does it mean thematic content analysis, it vague and not clear, please specify it. it creates mislead to qualitative result interpretation. in addition the qualitative result interpretation should be consistent/matched with analysis method.

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. We would like to clarify that we employed thematic analysis for our qualitative study. The reference to thematic content analysis was made in error, and we have since corrected it to accurately reflect our use of thematic analysis. Regarding the consistency of our results with the method of analysis, we have revisited our interpretations and cross-verified them against our thematic analysis results. Each interpretation has been linked to specific themes in the revised manuscript, ensuring that the conclusions are grounded in the evidence presented.

7. what the qualitative study result support? please put the qualitative result in appropriate place

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. The results of qualitative analysis were placed after the quantitative result, page 18-21, Lines 308-362.

8. Please check the study for grammar and plagiarized content?

Response: Thank you. We have edited the revised manuscript to rectify misspellings, grammatical errors, and unclear sentences.

9. Majority (63.4%) of the study participants were age between 50 to 59 years, this classified as middle age adult. does it can say elder?

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. Adults aged 50 and above are indeed not elderly rather they are adults who are relatively older (older adults). As we responded to question number 3, we explained why 50+ adults are our population, in the introduction section of the revised manuscript, page 5, lines 83-90.

10. What is the sample size for second objective?

Response: Thank you for your question. We have included the sample size calculation for both objectives in supplementary file 1 of the revised manuscript. We found that the sample size calculated for the second objective was lower, so we used the larger sample size from the first objective.

11. undiagnosed HTN is new so it is possible to say prevalence of undiagnosed HTN?

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. We collect the data cross-sectionally, where the dependent and independent variables were collected simultaneously. Therefore, we could not determine whether the undiagnosed HTN was new or not. In order to calculate the incidence we were supposed to follow a group of people who were initially free from the undiagnosed HTN.

12. Why did you merge overweight and obesity? The degree of being obese and being overweight is different and could have different impacts.

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. We merged being obese and overweight for the health and statistical context. In the health research context, both overweight and obesity are linked to increased risk of diseases, more specifically chronic diseases, though the degree of risk varies. This provides valuable insights for effective decision-making. Regarding the statistical perspective, merging variables leads to meeting the chi-square test criteria and improved statistical power to make comparisons.

13. Study period: replace the phrase “between March 19 and May 20, 2023” with “from March 19 to May 20, 2023”

Response: Thank you for the insightful suggestion. As per your suggestion, we modified the study period to ‘from March 19 to May 20, 2023’ in the abstract and methods section of the revised manuscript.

14. Regarding measurement of the dependent variable, two measurements were taken 5 minutes apart. I don’t think 5 minutes are enough to diagnose a patient with hypertension. Whenever possible, the diagnosis should not be made on a single office visit.

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. We made the diagnosis in a single office visit to save time and avoid missing participants during follow-up visits to measure blood pressure. The repeated measurements were separated by 5 minutes. For proper measurement of blood pressure in an office in a sitting position, repeated measurements can be separated by 1-2 min (10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087). Therefore, a 5-minute interval was quite enough.

15. Before measuring the blood pressure, have you addressed the protocols to measure blood pressure? For example, how do you assesses the participants to avoid smoking, caffeine and exercise for 30 min; empty bladder; remain seated and relaxed for 3–5 min? Nothing is written in this case as it could have impact on the result. Additionally, was the room Quiet with comfortable temperature?

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. We completely agree with you. We addressed all protocols to measure blood pressure before taking the blood pressure measurement. We waited for 30 minutes, after making sure that the participants were refrained from smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol, or taking caffeine before their BP measurement was taken. This by default made them eligible for BP measurement as we confirmed they had not taken anything within 30 minutes. The participants were also told to empty their bladder and avoid drinking water shortly before the measurement. After they entered the measurement room, the participants sat in a chair with feet flat on the floor and back supported for 3 minutes before taking the first BP reading. The second measurements were taken 5 minutes later. We included this procedure in the revised manuscript. Page 8, lines 147-154

16. Regular physical activity was defined as Moderate intensity aerobic exercise (walking, jogging, cycling, yoga, or swimming) for 30 minutes on 5–7 days per week but in your case it is “Engaging in physical activity for 20–30 minutes, three days a week, is considered regular physical exercise”

Response: Thank you for the insightful inquiry. We measured physical activity according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), which is a widely used tool designed to assess physical activity levels in various populations globally. As per the IPAQ, a minimum of at least three activities in a week for 20-30 minutes per day is needed to be considered as a physical activity.

Comments from Reviewer 3

Although the manuscript is good, I have several criticisms. thus you'll attempt to review and edit in light of the feedback. I made to attach all comments in PDF format. concept, data analysis, and following the rules when writing the manuscript are some of those.

Response: Thank you for giving us your valuable time to review our paper and for your comments and suggestions, which we got as valuable input to improve the manuscript.

1. From the title line 1, there is a reputation for “hypertension-undiagnosed hypertension”, please rewrite again to get more credit or approval?

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We modified the title to “Undiagnosed hypertension and associated

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

pone.0322610.s006.docx (30.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Amanuel Yoseph

29 Nov 2024

PONE-D-24-27240R1Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approachPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tebeje,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 13 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Amanuel Yoseph, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Thank you very much to get the opportunity to review this important public health problem. The authors are fully addressed the comment I raised previously. but I have some suggestions to improve quality and scientific back ground of the manuscript.

1.What adds this study from qualitative finding?

2.In discussion parts the qualitative study have not support the quantitative finding simply put in separate manner and compares with other similar study only. what is the reason to add qualitative study to this research? I don.t see its relevance as it stands.

3. the objective is the same for both quantitative and qualitative, but it seems like different in your write up. it needs arrangement. for example you should explained the quantitative study, then followed by qualitative finding to make the finding strong.

4. non of the participants knew the scientific back ground of the HTN. It needs modification.

5.the qualitative analysis in some sentences seems like to summative content analysis. it needs some modification.

7.quantitative and qualitative study lack integrity at discussion parts of the manuscript. it needs align together.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Asmamaw Deguale Worku

Reviewer #3: Yes:  wasihun kindalem worku

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322610.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 2


13 Jan 2025

Subject: Responses to comments (revision 2)

Dear Editor,

Thank you for taking the time to consider our manuscript titled “Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach” for the Plos One Journal original research article. We appreciate the time and effort you and the reviewers have dedicated to providing valuable feedback on our manuscript.

We have considered the comments and concerns and made every effort to address them. We agree with all the comments and have incorporated the corresponding revisions into the revised manuscript. All revised texts are track-changed to point out the changes we made. We believe that our manuscript has been significantly improved as a result of these revisions.

We would like to thank you once again for your consideration of our work and for inviting us to submit the revised manuscript. We look forward to hearing from you. Our detailed, point-by-point responses to the comments are given below.

Best regards,

Tsion Mulat Tebeje

School of Public Health, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.

Email: yemarina12@gmail.com / Tsionmulat@du.edu.et (corresponding author)

Journal Requirements

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: We have reviewed our list of references and changed some references. We have removed and replaced the retracted articles with relevant and current references. All changes made to the reference list have been highlighted in the revised manuscript using track change.

Response to reviewers

Reviewer 2

General comment: Thank you very much to get the opportunity to review this important public health problem. The authors are fully addressed the comment I raised previously. but I have some suggestions to improve quality and scientific back ground of the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for your kind words and for reviewing our manuscript which benefited from your comments and suggestions.

Comment 1: What adds this study from qualitative finding?

Response 1: The qualitative study aimed to assess participants' knowledge and attitudes towards hypertension. Participants' knowledge is one aspect measured in the quantitative portion of this research. Consequently, the qualitative findings provided further insight into their understanding of hypertension, including its definition, signs and symptoms, self-management strategies, and preventive measures. This approach revealed additional concepts regarding knowledge about hypertension that are not addressed in the quantitative questions.

Comment 2: In discussion parts the qualitative study have not support the quantitative finding simply put in separate manner and compares with other similar study only. what is the reason to add qualitative study to this research? I don.t see its relevance as it stands.

Response 2: Thank you. As we mentioned above the qualitative study is meant to assess participants' knowledge and attitudes towards hypertension. We aligned the qualitative and quantitative study in the discussion section.

Comment 3: the objective is the same for both quantitative and qualitative, but it seems like different in your write up. it needs arrangement. for example you should explained the quantitative study, then followed by qualitative finding to make the finding strong.

Response 3: Thank you for your insightful suggestion. In the results section, we started with quantitative results, followed by qualitative findings.

Comment 4: non of the participants knew the scientific back ground of the HTN. It needs modification.

Response 4: Thank you. We have changed it to “few of them knew the scientific definition of HTN” and we made the changes with track change to spot the changes.

Comment 5: The qualitative analysis in some sentences seems like to summative content analysis. it needs some modification.

Response 5: Thank you. As per your suggestion, we have modified the parts that may seem summative content analysis. Page, lines

Comment 6: quantitative and qualitative study lack integrity at discussion parts of the manuscript. it needs align together.

Response 6: Thank you for pointing this out. In the discussion section, we integrated the qualitative findings with the quantitative findings.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0322610.s007.docx (17.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Daniele Romanello

26 Mar 2025

Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach

PONE-D-24-27240R2

Dear Dr. Author,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Daniele Romanello

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Thank you for giving the chance to review this manuscript . The authors were covered and addressed the comments and suggestions I raised. So I have no Any comments further. Thank you again.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Asmamaw Deguale Worku

Reviewer #3: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Daniele Romanello

PONE-D-24-27240R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tebeje,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Daniele Romanello

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Sample size calculation.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0322610.s001.docx (19.4KB, docx)
    S1 Table. Knowledge of the study participants about hypertension.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0322610.s002.docx (15.4KB, docx)
    S1 Dataset. Primary data collected for the study.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0322610.s003.xlsx (334.6KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-24-27240_reviewer.pdf

    pone.0322610.s004.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comment.pdf

    pone.0322610.s005.pdf (120KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0322610.s006.docx (30.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0322610.s007.docx (17.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    “All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.”


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES