Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1992 Dec;132(4):1177–1185. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1177

The Effects of Selection on Linkage Analysis for Quantitative Traits

M J Mackinnon 1, MAJ Georges 1
PMCID: PMC1205237  PMID: 1459434

Abstract

The effects of within-sample selection on the outcome of analyses detecting linkage between genetic markers and quantitative traits were studied. It was found that selection by truncation for the trait of interest significantly reduces the differences between marker genotype means thus reducing the power to detect linked quantitative trait loci (QTL). The size of this reduction is a function of proportion selected, the magnitude of the QTL effect, recombination rate between the marker locus and the QTL, and the allele frequency of the QTL. Proportion selected was the most influential of these factors on bias, e.g., for an allele substitution effect of one standard deviation unit, selecting the top 80%, 50% or 20% of the population required 2,6 or 24 times the number of progeny, respectively, to offset the loss of power caused by this selection. The effect on power was approximately linear with respect to the size of gene effect, almost invariant to recombination rate, and a complex function of QTL allele frequency. It was concluded that experimental samples from animal populations which have been subjected to even minor amounts of selection will be inefficient in yielding information on linkage between markers and loci influencing the quantitative trait under selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (889.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fries R., Beckmann J. S., Georges M., Soller M., Womack J. The bovine gene map. Anim Genet. 1989;20(1):3–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1989.tb00838.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kennedy B. W., Quinton M., van Arendonk J. A. Estimation of effects of single genes on quantitative traits. J Anim Sci. 1992 Jul;70(7):2000–2012. doi: 10.2527/1992.7072000x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sax K. The Association of Size Differences with Seed-Coat Pattern and Pigmentation in PHASEOLUS VULGARIS. Genetics. 1923 Nov;8(6):552–560. doi: 10.1093/genetics/8.6.552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weller J. I., Kashi Y., Soller M. Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 1990 Sep;73(9):2525–2537. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78938-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES