Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Mar;133(3):637–648. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.637

Deletion Analysis of the Selfish B Chromosome, Paternal Sex Ratio (Psr), in the Parasitic Wasp Nasonia Vitripennis

L W Beukeboom 1, J H Werren 1
PMCID: PMC1205349  PMID: 8454206

Abstract

Paternal Sex Ratio (PSR) is a ``selfish'' B chromosome in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. It is transmitted via sperm, but causes supercondensation and destruction of the paternal chromosomes in early fertilized eggs. Because this wasp has haplodiploid sex determination, the effect of PSR is to convert diploid (female) eggs into haploid (male) eggs that carry PSR. Characterizing its genetic structure is a first step toward understanding mechanisms of PSR action. The chromosome is largely heterochromatic and contains several tandemly repeated DNA sequences that are not present on the autosomes. A deletion analysis of PSR was performed to investigate organization of repeats and location of functional domains causing paternal chromosome destruction. Deletion profiles using probes to PSR-specific repetitive DNA indicate that most repeats are organized in blocks on the chromosome. This study shows that the functional domains of PSR can be deleted, resulting in nonfunctional PSR chromosomes that are transmitted to daughters. A functional domain may be linked with the psr22 repeat, but function may also depend on abundance of PSR-specific repeats on the chromosome. It is hypothesized that the repeats act as a ``sink'' for a product required for proper paternal chromosome processing. Almost all deletion chromosomes remained either functional of nonfunctional in subsequent generations following their creation. One chromosome was exceptional in that it reverted from nonfunctionality to functionality in one lineage. Transmission rates of nonfunctional deletion chromosomes were high through haploid males, but low through diploid females.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROWN S. W. Spontaneous chromosome fragmentation in the armored scale insects (Coccoidea-Diaspididae). J Morphol. 1960 Mar;106:159–185. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051060204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beukeboom L. W., Reed K. M., Werren J. H. Effects of deletions on mitotic stability of the paternal-sex-ratio (PSR) chromosome from Nasonia. Chromosoma. 1992 Dec;102(1):20–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00352286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biessmann H., Mason J. M. Progressive loss of DNA sequences from terminal chromosome deficiencies in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1988 Apr;7(4):1081–1086. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02916.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackburn E. H. The molecular structure of centromeres and telomeres. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:163–194. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breeuwer J. A., Werren J. H. Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature. 1990 Aug 9;346(6284):558–560. doi: 10.1038/346558a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown J., Cebra-Thomas J. A., Bleil J. D., Wassarman P. M., Silver L. M. A premature acrosome reaction is programmed by mouse t haplotypes during sperm differentiation and could play a role in transmission ratio distortion. Development. 1989 Aug;106(4):769–773. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.4.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crow J. F. The ultraselfish gene. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):389–391. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson B. E., Saint Girons I. The Escherichia coli regulatory protein MetJ binds to a tandemly repeated 8 bp palindrome. Mol Microbiol. 1989 Nov;3(11):1639–1648. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doolittle W. F., Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):601–603. doi: 10.1038/284601a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eickbush D. G., Eickbush T. H., Werren J. H. Molecular characterization of repetitive DNA sequences from a B chromosome. Chromosoma. 1992 Aug;101(9):575–583. doi: 10.1007/BF00660317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haber J. E., Thorburn P. C. Healing of broken linear dicentric chromosomes in yeast. Genetics. 1984 Feb;106(2):207–226. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haber J. E., Thorburn P. C., Rogers D. Meiotic and mitotic behavior of dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1984 Feb;106(2):185–205. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Howard C. A., Gummere G. R., Lyon M. F., Bennett D., Artzt K. Genetic and molecular analysis of the proximal region of the mouse t-complex using new molecular probes and partial t-haplotypes. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):1103–1114. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. James A. C., Jaenike J. "Sex ratio" meiotic drive in Drosophila testacea. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):651–656. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee W., Haslinger A., Karin M., Tjian R. Activation of transcription by two factors that bind promoter and enhancer sequences of the human metallothionein gene and SV40. Nature. 1987 Jan 22;325(6102):368–372. doi: 10.1038/325368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McClintock B. The Fusion of Broken Ends of Chromosomes Following Nuclear Fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1942 Nov;28(11):458–463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.28.11.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McClintock B. The Stability of Broken Ends of Chromosomes in Zea Mays. Genetics. 1941 Mar;26(2):234–282. doi: 10.1093/genetics/26.2.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nur U. Harmful supernumerary chromosomes in a mealy bug population. Genetics. 1966 Nov;54(5):1225–1238. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.5.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nur U. Maintenance of a "Parasitic" B Chromosome in the Grasshopper MELANOPLUS FEMUR-RUBRUM. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):499–512. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nur U., Werren J. H., Eickbush D. G., Burke W. D., Eickbush T. H. A "selfish" B chromosome that enhances its transmission by eliminating the paternal genome. Science. 1988 Apr 22;240(4851):512–514. doi: 10.1126/science.3358129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Olds-Clarke P., Peitz B. Fertility of sperm from t/+ mice: evidence that +-bearing sperm are dysfunctional. Genet Res. 1986 Feb;47(1):49–52. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Orgel L. E., Crick F. H. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):604–607. doi: 10.1038/284604a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Powers P. A., Ganetzky B. On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Molecular analysis of the Sd locus. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):133–144. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Risse G., Jooss K., Neuberg M., Brüller H. J., Müller R. Asymmetrical recognition of the palindromic AP1 binding site (TRE) by Fos protein complexes. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 1;8(12):3825–3832. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08560.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ryan S. L., Saul G. B., 2nd, Conner G. W. Aberrant segregation of R-locus genes in male progeny from incompatible crosses in Mormoniella. J Hered. 1985 Jan-Feb;76(1):21–26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ryan S. L., Saul G. B., 2nd, Conner G. W. Separation of factors containing R-locus genes in Mormoniella stocks derived from aberrant segregation following incompatible crosses. J Hered. 1987 Jul-Aug;78(4):273–275. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Seitz A. W., Bennett D. Transmission distortion of t-haplotypes is due to interactions between meiotic partners. Nature. 1985 Jan 10;313(5998):143–144. doi: 10.1038/313143a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Temin R. G. The independent distorting ability of the Enhancer of Segregation Distortion, E(SD), in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 Jun;128(2):339–356. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Uehara H., Ebersole T., Bennett D., Artzt K. Submegabase clusters of unstable tandem repeats unique to the Tla region of mouse t haplotypes. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):1093–1102. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES