Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Mar;133(3):729–736. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.729

Mutation Models and Quantitative Genetic Variation

Z B Zeng 1, C C Cockerham 1
PMCID: PMC1205355  PMID: 8454212

Abstract

Analyses of evolution and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation depend on the mutation models assumed. Currently two polygenic mutation models have been used in theoretical analyses. One is the random walk mutation model and the other is the house-of-cards mutation model. Although in the short term the two models give similar results for the evolution of neutral genetic variation within and between populations, the predictions of the changes of the variation are qualitatively different in the long term. In this paper a more general mutation model, called the regression mutation model, is proposed to bridge the gap of the two models. The model regards the regression coefficient, γ, of the effect of an allele after mutation on the effect of the allele before mutation as a parameter. When γ = 1 or 0, the model becomes the random walk model or the house-of-cards model, respectively. The additive genetic variances within and between populations are formulated for this mutation model, and some insights are gained by looking at the changes of the genetic variances as γ changes. The effects of γ on the statistical test of selection for quantitative characters during macroevolution are also discussed. The results suggest that the random walk mutation model should not be interpreted as a null hypothesis of neutrality for testing against alternative hypotheses of selection during macroevolution because it can potentially allocate too much variation for the change of population means under neutrality.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (690.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cockerham C. C., Tachida H. Evolution and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation by mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6205–6209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hill W. G. Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet Res. 1982 Dec;40(3):255–278. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300019145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kimura M. A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Sep;54(3):731–736. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.3.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lande R. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res. 1975 Dec;26(3):221–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li W. H. Maintenance of genetic variability under mutation and selection pressures in a finite population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2509–2513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lynch M. The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet Res. 1988 Apr;51(2):137–148. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MUKAI T. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. Genetics. 1964 Jul;50:1–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ohta T., Tachida H. Theoretical study of near neutrality. I. Heterozygosity and rate of mutant substitution. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):219–229. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Turelli M. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Popul Biol. 1984 Apr;25(2):138–193. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Watterson G. A. Heterosis or neutrality? Genetics. 1977 Apr;85(4):789–814. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.4.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zeng Z. B., Tachida H., Cockerham C. C. Effects of mutation on selection limits in finite populations with multiple alleles. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):977–984. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES