Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Apr;133(4):825–835. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.4.825

Marker Effects of G to C Transversions on Intragenic Recombination and Mismatch Repair in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe

P Schar 1, J Kohli 1
PMCID: PMC1205403  PMID: 8462844

Abstract

G to C transversion mutations show very strong allele-specific marker effects on the frequency of wild-type recombinants in intragenic two-factor crosses. Here we present a detailed study of the marker effect of one representative, the ade6-M387 mutation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Crosses of M387 with other mutations at varying distance reveal highly increased prototroph frequencies in comparison with the C to T transition mutation ade6-51 (control without any known marker effect) located four nucleotides from M387. The marker effect of M387 is strongest (>40-fold) for crosses with mutations less than 15 nucleotides from M387. It decreases to an intermediate level (5-10-fold) in crosses with mutations located 25-150 base pairs from M387/51 and is very low in crosses with mutations beyond 200 base pairs. On the basis of these results and the quantitation of the low efficiency of C/C mismatch repair presented in the accompanying publication we propose the existence of at least two different types of mechanisms for base mismatch repair in fission yeast. The major system is suggested to recognize all base mismatches except C/C with high efficiency and to generate long excision tracts (approximately 100 nucleotides unidirectionally). The minor system is proposed to recognize all base mismatches including C/C with low and variable efficiency and to have short excision tracts (approximately 10 nucleotides unidirectionally). We estimate from the M387 marker effect that the minor system accounts for approximately 1-8% repair of non-C/C mismatches (depending on the nature of the mutation) in fission yeast meiosis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bishop D. K., Andersen J., Kolodner R. D. Specificity of mismatch repair following transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with heteroduplex plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3713–3717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop D. K., Kolodner R. D. Repair of heteroduplex plasmid DNA after transformation into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;6(10):3401–3409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.10.3401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):69–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grimm C., Kohli J., Murray J., Maundrell K. Genetic engineering of Schizosaccharomyces pombe: a system for gene disruption and replacement using the ura4 gene as a selectable marker. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Dec;215(1):81–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00331307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gutz H. Site Specific Induction of Gene Conversion in SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE. Genetics. 1971 Nov;69(3):317–337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.3.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hastings P. J. Measurement of restoration and conversion: its meaning for the mismatch repair hypothesis of conversion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:49–53. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heyer W. D., Sipiczki M., Kohli J. Replicating plasmids in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: improvement of symmetric segregation by a new genetic element. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;6(1):80–89. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.1.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Judd S. R., Petes T. D. Physical lengths of meiotic and mitotic gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):401–410. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kohli J., Munz P., Aebi R., Amstutz H., Gysler C., Heyer W. D., Lehmann L., Schuchert P., Szankasi P., Thuriaux P. Interallelic and intergenic conversion in three serine tRNA genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:31–40. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kramer B., Kramer W., Williamson M. S., Fogel S. Heteroduplex DNA correction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mismatch specific and requires functional PMS genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4432–4440. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):160–164. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:435–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.002251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moore C. W., Hampsey D. M., Ernst J. F., Sherman F. Differential mismatch repair can explain the disproportionalities between physical distances and recombination frequencies of cyc1 mutations in yeast. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):21–34. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muster-Nassal C., Kolodner R. Mismatch correction catalyzed by cell-free extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7618–7622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Fungal recombination. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Mar;49(1):33–58. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.1.33-58.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pukkila P. J., Stephens M. D., Binninger D. M., Errede B. Frequency and directionality of gene conversion events involving the CYC7-H3 mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1986 Oct;114(2):347–361. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Decreasing gradients of gene conversion on both sides of the initiation site for meiotic recombination at the ARG4 locus in yeast. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):813–822. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schär P., Munz P., Kohli J. Meiotic mismatch repair quantified on the basis of segregation patterns in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 1993 Apr;133(4):815–824. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.4.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith G. R. Mechanism and control of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:179–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stewart S. E., Roeder G. S. Transcription by RNA polymerase I stimulates mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3464–3472. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Szankasi P., Heyer W. D., Schuchert P., Kohli J. DNA sequence analysis of the ade6 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Wild-type and mutant alleles including the recombination host spot allele ade6-M26. J Mol Biol. 1988 Dec 20;204(4):917–925. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williamson M. S., Game J. C., Fogel S. Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2. Genetics. 1985 Aug;110(4):609–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.4.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES