Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 May;134(1):29–42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.29

Stage-Specific Effects of X-Irradiation on Yeast Meiosis

L W Thorne 1, B Byers 1
PMCID: PMC1205431  PMID: 8514137

Abstract

Previous work has shown that cdc13 causes meiotic arrest of Saccharomyces cerevisiae following DNA replication by a RAD9-dependent mechanism. In the present work, we have further investigated the implicit effects of chromosomal lesions on progression through meiosis by exposing yeast cells to X-irradiation at various times during sporulation. We find that exposure of RAD9 cells to X-irradiation early in meiosis prevents sporulation, arresting the cells at a stage prior to premeiotic DNA replication. rad9 meiotic cells are much less responsive to X-irradiation damage, completing sporulation after treatment with doses sufficient to cause arrest of RAD9 strains. These findings thereby reveal a RAD9-dependent checkpoint function in meiosis that is distinct from the G(2) arrest previously shown to result from cdc13 dysfunction. Analysis of the spores that continued to be produced by either RAD9 or rad9 cultures that were X-irradiated in later stages of sporulation revealed most spores to be viable, even after exposure to radiation doses sufficient to kill most vegetative cells. This finding demonstrates that the lesions induced by X-irradiation at later times fail to trigger the checkpoint function revealed by cdc13 arrest and suggests that the lesions may be subject to repair by serving as intermediates in the recombination process. Strains mutant for chromosomal synapsis and recombination, and therefore defective in meiotic disjunction, were tested for evidence that X-ray-induced lesions might alleviate inviability by promoting recombination. Enhancement of spore viability when spo11 (but not hop1) diploids were X-irradiated during meiosis indicates that induced lesions may partially substitute for SPO11-dependent functions that are required for the initiation of recombination.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum P., Yip C., Goetsch L., Byers B. A yeast gene essential for regulation of spindle pole duplication. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5386–5397. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byers B., Goetsch L. Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:123–131. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byers B., Goetsch L. Preparation of yeast cells for thin-section electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:602–608. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94044-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elford H. L. Effect of hydroxyurea on ribonucleotide reductase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1968 Oct 10;33(1):129–135. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(68)90266-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Engebrecht J., Hirsch J., Roeder G. S. Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over: their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation. Cell. 1990 Sep 7;62(5):927–937. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90267-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Engebrecht J., Roeder G. S. MER1, a yeast gene required for chromosome pairing and genetic recombination, is induced in meiosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2379–2389. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Game J. C., Mortimer R. K. A genetic study of x-ray sensitive mutants in yeast. Mutat Res. 1974 Sep;24(3):281–292. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(74)90176-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Game J. C., Sitney K. C., Cook V. E., Mortimer R. K. Use of a ring chromosome and pulsed-field gels to study interhomolog recombination, double-strand DNA breaks and sister-chromatid exchange in yeast. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):695–713. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giroux C. N., Dresser M. E., Tiano H. F. Genetic control of chromosome synapsis in yeast meiosis. Genome. 1989;31(1):88–94. doi: 10.1139/g89-017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartwell L. H. Macromolecule synthesis in temperature-sensitive mutants of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1967 May;93(5):1662–1670. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.5.1662-1670.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartwell L. H., Smith D. Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Jul;110(3):381–395. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartwell L. H. Three additional genes required for deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;115(3):966–974. doi: 10.1128/jb.115.3.966-974.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ho K. S. Induction of DNA double-strand breaks by X-rays in a radiosensitive strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1975 Dec;30(3):327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollingsworth N. M., Byers B. HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. Genetics. 1989 Mar;121(3):445–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.3.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hopper A. K., Hall B. D. Mating type and sporulation in yeast. I. Mutations which alter mating-type control over sporulation. Genetics. 1975 May;80(1):41–59. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hutter K. J., Eipel H. E. Microbial determinations by flow cytometry. J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Aug;113(2):369–375. doi: 10.1099/00221287-113-2-369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kelly S. L., Merrill C., Parry J. M. Cyclic variations in sensitivity to X-irradiation during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;191(2):314–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00334832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klapholz S., Esposito R. E. A new mapping method employing a meiotic rec-mutant of yeast. Genetics. 1982 Mar;100(3):387–412. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.3.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kolodkin A. L., Klar A. J., Stahl F. W. Double-strand breaks can initiate meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1986 Aug 29;46(5):733–740. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lauer G. D., Roberts T. M., Klotz L. C. Determination of the nuclear DNA content of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and implications for the organization of DNA in yeast chromosomes. J Mol Biol. 1977 Aug 25;114(4):507–526. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90175-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawrence C. W., Holt P. D. Effect of gamma radiation and alpha particles on gene recombination in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Mutat Res. 1970 Dec;10(6):545–555. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Machida I., Nakai S. Differential effect of UV irradiation on induction of intragenic and intergenic recombination during commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1980 Nov;73(1):69–79. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90136-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McGrath R. A., Williams R. W. Reconstruction in vivo of irradiated Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid; the rejoining of broken pieces. Nature. 1966 Oct 29;212(5061):534–535. doi: 10.1038/212534a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McKim K. S., Howell A. M., Rose A. M. The effects of translocations on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):987–1001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Menees T. M., Roeder G. S. MEI4, a yeast gene required for meiotic recombination. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):675–682. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicolas A., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35–39. doi: 10.1038/338035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Fungal recombination. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Mar;49(1):33–58. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.1.33-58.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W., Rothstein R. J. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6354–6358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reed S. I. The selection of S. cerevisiae mutants defective in the start event of cell division. Genetics. 1980 Jul;95(3):561–577. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.3.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Resnick M. A., Chow T., Nitiss J., Game J. Changes in the chromosomal DNA of yeast during meiosis in repair mutants and the possible role of a deoxyribonuclease. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:639–649. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Resnick M. A., Game J. C., Stasiewicz S. Genetic effects of UV irradiation on excision-proficient and -deficient yeast during meiosis. Genetics. 1983 Aug;104(4):603–618. doi: 10.1093/genetics/104.4.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Resnick M. A., Kasimos J. N., Game J. C., Braun R. J., Roth R. M. Changes in DNA during meiosis in a repair-deficient mutant (rad 52) of yeast. Science. 1981 May 1;212(4494):543–545. doi: 10.1126/science.7010606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Resnick M. A., Martin P. The repair of double-strand breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Jan 16;143(2):119–129. doi: 10.1007/BF00266917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rockmill B., Roeder G. S. RED1: a yeast gene required for the segregation of chromosomes during the reductional division of meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6057–6061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. SHERMAN F., ROMAN H. Evidence for two types of allelic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1963 Feb;48:255–261. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Saeki T., Machida I., Nakai S. Genetic control of diploid recovery after gamma-irradiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1980 Dec;73(2):251–265. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Salts Y., Simchen G., Piñon R. DNA Degradation and reduced recombination following UV irradiation during meiosis in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Jul 5;146(1):55–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00267983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schild D., Byers B. Meiotic effects of DNA-defective cell division cycle mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma. 1978 Dec 21;70(1):109–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00292220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shuster E. O., Byers B. Pachytene arrest and other meiotic effects of the start mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):29–43. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Simchen G., Idar D., Kassir Y. Recombination and hydroxyurea inhibition of DNA synthesis in yeast meiosis. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Feb 27;144(1):21–27. doi: 10.1007/BF00277299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Simchen G., Salts Y., Piñon R. Sensitivity of meiotic yeast cells to ultraviolet light. Genetics. 1973 Apr;73(4):531–541. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.4.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Symington L. S. Double-strand-break repair and recombination catalyzed by a nuclear extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):987–996. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08033.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Weber L., Byers B. A RAD9-dependent checkpoint blocks meiosis of cdc13 yeast cells. Genetics. 1992 May;131(1):55–63. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wood J. S. Genetic effects of methyl benzimidazole-2-yl-carbamate on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;2(9):1064–1079. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES