Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Jun;134(2):401–408. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.401

The Effect of DNA Sequence Divergence on Sexual Isolation in Bacillus

M S Roberts 1, F M Cohan 1
PMCID: PMC1205484  PMID: 8325477

Abstract

We have investigated the relationship between sexual isolation and DNA sequence divergence in the transformation (at locus rpoB) of a naturally competent strain of Bacillus subtilis. Using both genomic DNA and a PCR-amplified segment of gene rpoB as donor, we found that the extent of sexual isolation at locus rpoB was closely predicted, over three orders of magnitude, as a log-linear function of sequence divergence at that locus. Because sexual isolation between a recipient and any potential donor may be determined as a general mathematical function of sequence divergence, transformation is perhaps the only sexual system, in either the prokaryotic or the eukaryotic world, in which sexual isolation can be predicted for a pair of species without having to perform the cross. These observations suggest the possibility of a general approach to the indirect prediction of sexual isolation in bacteria recombining principally by natural transformation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albritton W. L., Setlow J. K., Thomas M., Sottnek F., Steigerwalt A. G. Heterospecific transformation in the genus Haemophilus. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;193(2):358–363. doi: 10.1007/BF00330693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boylan R. J., Mendelson N. H., Brooks D., Young F. E. Regulation of the bacterial cell wall: analysis of a mutant of Bacillus subtilis defective in biosynthesis of teichoic acid. J Bacteriol. 1972 Apr;110(1):281–290. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.1.281-290.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Danner D. B., Deich R. A., Sisco K. L., Smith H. O. An eleven-base-pair sequence determines the specificity of DNA uptake in Haemophilus transformation. Gene. 1980 Nov;11(3-4):311–318. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(80)90071-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dubnau D. Genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Rev. 1991 Sep;55(3):395–424. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.395-424.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dubnau D., Smith I., Morell P., Marmur J. Gene conservation in Bacillus species. I. Conserved genetic and nucleic acid base sequence homologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Aug;54(2):491–498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.2.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldberg I. D., Gwinn D. D., Thorne C. B. Interspecies transformation between Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966 May 25;23(4):543–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harford N., Mergeay M. Interspecific transformation of rifampicin resistance in the genus Bacillus. Mol Gen Genet. 1973 Jan 24;120(2):151–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00267243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris-Warrick R. M., Lederberg J. Interspecies transformation in Bacillus: sequence heterology as the major barrier. J Bacteriol. 1978 Mar;133(3):1237–1245. doi: 10.1128/jb.133.3.1237-1245.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ikawa S., Shibata T., Ando T., Saito H. Genetic studies on site-specific endodeoxyribonucleases in Bacillus subtilis: multiple modification and restriction systems in transformants of Bacillus subtilis 168. Mol Gen Genet. 1980 Feb;177(3):359–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00271474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marmur J., Seaman E., Levine J. INTERSPECIFIC TRANSFORMATION IN BACILLUS. J Bacteriol. 1963 Feb;85(2):461–467. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.2.461-467.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shen P., Huang H. V. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Te Riele H. P., Venema G. Molecular fate of heterologous bacterial DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis. II. Unstable association of heterologous DNA with the recipient chromosome. Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):329–340. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Trautner T. A., Pawlek B., Bron S., Anagnostopoulos C. Restriction and modification in B. subtilis. Biological aspects. Mol Gen Genet. 1974;131(3):181–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00267958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson G. A., Young F. E. Intergenotic transformation of the Bacillus subtilis genospecies. J Bacteriol. 1972 Sep;111(3):705–716. doi: 10.1128/jb.111.3.705-716.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. te Riele H. P., Venema G. Molecular fate of heterologous bacterial DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis. I. Processing of B. pumilus and B. licheniformis DNA in B. subtilis. Genetics. 1982 Jun;101(2):179–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. te Riele H. P., Venema G. Molecular fate of heterologous bacterial DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis: further characterization of unstable association between donor and recipient DNA and the involvement of the cellular membrane. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(1-2):200–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00332747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES