Abstract
Purpose
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is a rare complication after dopamine agonist treatment of macroprolactinomas. Up to 90% need surgical repair, however, there are controversial opinions on the necessity of tumor resection upon this occasion. Here we present our long-term follow-up experience in patients who underwent surgical repair of the CSF leak or observation.
Methods
We report a series of three patients who presented with cabergoline-induced CSF rhinorrhea with long-term follow-up up to 170 months. Two patients underwent endoscopic transnasal-transsphenoidal surgical repair of CSF rhinorrhea by fat graft and fibrin glue without tumor removal. In another patient, CSF rhinorrhea resolved spontaneously after two weeks without recurrence.
Results
All three patients had no recurrence of CSF rhinorrhea during long-term follow-up up to 170 months. One patient with surgical CSF leak repair was asymptomatic with continued medication at long-term follow-up of 116 months. Tumor progression occurred 21 months after CSF leakage repair in another patient after cessation of dopamine agonist treatment and necessitated tumor debulking. The patient with continued medication without surgery had no recurrence of CSF rhinorrhea on long-term follow-up of 170 months.
Conclusion
The optimal management of CSF fistulae due to tumor shrinkage of macroprolactinomas after dopamine agonist therapy remains to be defined. Exceptionally, medication-induced CSF fistulae in response to tumor shrinkage may close spontaneously without recurrence. If persistent, transnasal-transsphenoidal closure of CSF fistulae represents an efficient treatment and dopamine agonist treatment may be continued. Thus, we recommend early surgical repair.
Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid leak, Cerebrospinal fluid fistula, Rhinorrhea, Dopamine agonist, Prolactinoma, Pituitary adenoma
Introduction
Medical treatment has replaced surgical resection of prolactinomas over the past four decades after introduction of bromocriptine in 1971 and of cabergoline in 1986 [1, 2], although more recently the published advantages of surgery have been reconsidered [3–7]. The selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist cabergoline is now recommended for primary treatment according to the evidence-based Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline since it has been shown to be superior in terms of response rate, resistance, tolerance and therapy regimen [8, 9]. Both, clinical improvement and tumor shrinkage are observed in the majority of patients on long-term follow-up [9–12].
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea has been thought to be unusual after medical treatment of prolactinomas, but it has been reported occasionally in the form of case reports or small case series [13–27]. Since, it was first described in the early 1980s, various treatment algorithms have been suggested. There are several open questions to be solved including the issue whether or not the tumor should be resected at the time of CSF fistula repair [13, 18, 22, 28]. A major problem to evaluate the different therapies which have been proposed is the limited length of follow-up in most instances.
Here, we report our long-term follow-up experience in three patients with cabergoline-induced CSF rhinorrhea who underwent either surgical repair of the CSF leak or observation.
Materials and methods
The database of patients with pituitary adenomas presenting at the Department of Neurosurgery at Hannover Medical School between 2005 and 2023 was screened retrospectively. Three patients with macroprolactinomas and medication-induced CSF rhinorrhea were identified. The medical records and imaging studies were reviewed and follow-up was supplemented. Data collected included patient demographics, symptoms at the time of diagnosis of prolactinoma, tumor expansion, serum prolactin before initiation of cabergoline therapy, weekly cabergoline dose administered, time span between initiation of cabergoline therapy and occurrence of CSF rhinorrhea, method of CSF leak repair, and histopathology.
Serum prolactin was measured excluding the “high dose hook effect” by dilution of 1:10 and 1:100. Recent follow-up was obtained in all patients.
Results
There were two men, and one woman. Age ranged between 19 and 66 years at the time of the occurrence of the CSF fistula (see Table 1). There was no incidence of meningitis. The time span between initiation of cabergoline therapy and occurrence of rhinorrhea was short (4–6 weeks in all cases). In one patient (case 2), CSF rhinorrhea resolved spontaneously. The other two patients underwent exploration via an endoscopic transnasal-transsphenoidal procedure and successful sealing of the dural defect with autologous fat graft and fibrin glue was achieved. For visualization of the CSF leak, intrathecal injection of fluorescein (5% fluorescein diluted 1:10, 0.01 ml per kg body weight) was performed on the evening before surgery. Both patients with surgical repair were treated with a lumbar drain for 7 and 12 days, respectively.
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with macroprolactinomas and cabergoline-induced cerebrospinal fluid fistulae
| Patients | Tumor expansion prior to cabergoline treatment | CSF leak appearance | CSF rhinorrhea treatment and outcome | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case # |
Sex | Age | Initial PRL ng/ml |
Symptoms on initial diagnosis | Size axial x CC mm |
Optic chiasm |
Carotid encase- ment |
Cavernous sinus invasion |
Sphenoid sinus invasion |
Posterior ethmoid cells invasion |
Clivus invasion |
CAB dose/ week |
Weeks to CSF leak |
Surgical repair |
LD post-op days |
Site of CSF leak |
| 1 | F | 19 | n/a |
Galactorrhea, secondary oligo-menorrhea |
77 × 37 | Slightly compressed | L + R | L + R | Completely filled | L + R | yes |
2x 0,25 mg |
6 | yes | 12 | clivus |
| 2 | M | 34 | 31,900 | Nausea | 80 × 36 | Slightly compressed | L + R | L + R | Filled | L + R | yes |
7x 0,5 mg |
4 |
no (spontaneous closure after 3 weeks) |
- | sella |
| 3 | M | 66 | 3622 | Left eye: upper temporal quadrant anopia | 31 × 35 | Compressed | L + R | L + R |
L + R Small part |
no | yes |
7x 0,25 mg |
6 | yes | 7 | sella |
PRL = prolactin, CC = craniocaudal, CAB = cabergoline, L = left, R = right, LD = lumbar drain
CSF rhinorrhea did not recur in any instance. The follow-up period ranged between 116 and 170 months. One patient underwent partial tumor resection in another clinic due to tumor growth after cessation of medication 21 months following CSF fistula repair.
Case vignettes
Case 1
A 19-year-old woman was admitted with increasing headaches. At age 15 a prolactinoma had been diagnosed at another hospital. Cabergoline therapy was installed and the tumor responded well. Galactorrhea and secondary oligomenorrhea resolved, serum prolactin had dropped to normal levels.
(6.3 ng/ml). When she had become pregnant cabergoline was exchanged for bromocriptine which she took only sporadically due to nausea.
Upon admission to our service at age 19 ophthalmologic examination did not reveal visual field defects. Endocrinological analysis under bromocriptine therapy showed suppressed but moderately increased serum prolactin (187 ng/ml), raised serum IGF1 (1118 ng/ml) and elevated serum HGH (46 ng/ml) levels. She also had stigmata of acromegaly. MRI now showed a giant pituitary adenoma (Fig. 1) with a maximum axial diameter of 77 mm expanding into the nasal cavity. Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the skull base showed extensive bony defects of the sella, the clivus and the sphenoid sinus wall due to compression and erosion. The tumor had invaded the posterior ethmoid cells. A biopsy was obtained via a transnasal-transsphenoidal approach. Histopathological examination confirmed the initial diagnosis of prolactinoma. No GH secreting cells were found in the tumor biopsy. The cabergoline regimen was re-established with doses of 0.25 mg biweekly. She again had a good response to cabergoline with a serum prolactin level of 40 ng/ml, but she still had elevated serum levels for GH (207.10 ng/ml) and for IGF-1 (731 ng/ml). She refused to take additional medication.
Fig. 1.
Imaging studies of patient 1 (19-year-old woman). A T1-weighted contrast enhanced MRI studies before re-administration of cabergoline therapy. The extensive pituitary tumor is widely invading the skull base, expanding to the right petrous bone, the cavernous sinus, the right sphenoid sinus and the clivus. B T1-weighted contrast enhanced MRI studies two months after re-administration of cabergoline therapy. The tumor has shrinked substantially. A small intratumoral cavity filled with air is visible. C CT imaging in bone window show the bony defects in the skull base (sella, clivus and sphenoid sinus wall)
She was re-admitted 10 weeks later with CSF rhinorrhea which had become apparent 4 weeks earlier. MRI imaging showed a significant reduction in tumor volume (Fig. 1). A CT scan demonstrated bony defects of the skull base. A transnasal-transsphenoidal exploration was performed by endoscopic technique. On the evening prior to the procedure, fluorescein was administered intrathecally. Intraoperatively a defect was detected in the transition zone to the upper clivus which was repaired with a fat plug and fibrin glue. A lumbar drain was installed for twelve days. There was no recurrence of CSF leakage thereafter and medication with cabergoline was continued (0.25 mg three times weekly). Serum prolactin at 11 months postoperatively was 40ng/ml. After medication was stopped during another pregnancy massive tumor growth occurred with severe headaches and oculomotor disturbances. The tumor then was debulked via a transnasal approach (21 months after CSF fistula repair) followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Further follow-up with continued medication was unremarkable without recurrence of the CSF fistula.
Case 2
A 34-year-old man presented with nausea. MRI showed an osteolytic lesion of the skull base and a giant prolactinoma expanding from the foramen magnum to the sella and the sphenoid sinus, and CT imaging demonstrated bony defects in the anterior cranial fossa (Fig. 2). Endocrinological work-up revealed a serum prolactin level of 31.900 ng/ml. Medication with cabergoline 0.25 mg daily was initiated. Serum prolactin dropped to 690 ng/ml within days. Due to a slight increase in serum prolactin some days later, the daily cabergoline dosage was subsequently increased to 0.5 mg. The serum prolactin then dropped to 308 ng/ml. MRI 10 days after initiation of cabergoline therapy showed a substantial reduction in tumor volume (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Imaging studies of patient 2 (34-year-old man). A T1-weighted contrast enhanced MRI studies show a giant prolactinoma with a maximum diameter of 8 cm encasing both ICAs and invading the cavernous sinus and the clivus. B T1-weighted contrast enhanced MRI studies 10 days after initiation of cabergoline therapy. There is massive tumor shrinkage with a small depot of air in the center of the tumor
The patient subsequently noted recurrent epistaxis. Two weeks thereafter rhinorrhea became evident. The nasal discharge was tested for beta-transferrin which was significantly raised (35 mg/dl). Surgical repair of the fistula was suggested, but the patient opted for a wait-and-see strategy. Medication was continued, and the patient was monitored with close surveillance. CSF discharge resolved spontaneously three weeks later and did not recur during follow-up up to 170 months. The serum prolactin at the last follow-up was 43.1 ng/ml.
Case 3
A 66-year-old man presented with a visual field defect. MRI showed an invasive pituitary macroadenoma expanding to the parasellar, suprasellar and infrasellar regions. Ophthalmologic examination demonstrated a temporal upper quadrant anopia for the left eye. MRI showed a tumor expanding through the sellar diaphragm in a waist-like formation considerably compressing the optic chiasm, and CT demonstrated invasion of the superior sphenoid sinus and erosion of the sellar walls (Fig. 3). Endocrinological work-up revealed a serum prolactin level of 3622 ng/ml.
Fig. 3.
Imaging studies of patient 3 (66-year-old man). A T1-weighted contrast enhanced MRI studies demonstrate a macroadenoma with para- and suprasellar expansion through the sellar diaphragm. B T1-weighted contrast enhanced MRI studies and T2-weighted MRI studies 6 weeks after cabergoline therapy show considerable shrinkage of the tumor. Note the fluid level in the posterior ethmoid cells on the right side. C CT imaging in bone window show the bony destruction of the upper clivus with tumor invasion into the ethmoid sinus and the nasal cavity
Medication with cabergoline at a dosage of 0.25 mg every second day was initiated. The serum prolactin level 10 days later showed a decrease to 2449 ng/ml. The cabergoline regime was.
subsequently changed to 0.25 mg daily. MRI showed a significant decrease in tumor volume. Six weeks later the patient presented with rhinorrhea. MRI now showed fluid in the posterior ethmoid cells on the right side (Fig. 3). Endoscopic transnasal exploration was performed seven weeks thereafter. On the evening prior to surgery, the patient received fluorescein intrathecally. Intraoperatively a defect could be detected at the anterior sellar wall where the tumor had invaded the skull base. The defect was repaired with an autologous fat plug, a fibrin coated sponge and a bone graft obtained from the perpendicular lamina. A lumbar drain was inserted for seven days. Cabergoline was tapered down to a maintenance dose of 0.25 mg weekly. There was no recurrence of CSF leakage during follow-up up to 116 months. The serum prolactin at the last follow-up was 0.8 ng/ml.
Discussion
Dopamine agonists effectively inhibit prolactin secretion in 90% of patients with prolactinoma and lead to substantial tumor shrinkage due to reduction of the lactotrophs’ cell size [10, 29]. Accordingly, in the three patients described here the macroprolactinoma quickly responded to cabergoline treatment with decreased serum prolactin levels and significant tumor shrinkage.
Although histologically benign, the growth pattern of prolactinomas often is invasive with bony destructions. In a study of 115 patients with pituitary macroadenomas where tumor invasiveness was assessed on the basis of MRI, prolactinomas were found to be more frequently invasive (67%) as compared to GH-secreting (46%) and nonsecreting (16%) pituitary adenomas [30]. In a series of surgical specimens of 60 patients with pituitary adenomas, microscopic dural infiltration was found in 91% of cases and in all patients (8 cases) with macroprolactinomas [31]. Prolactinomas are known to expand preferentially into the infrasellar space and to invade the sphenoid bone, occasionally reaching out to the nasopharynx or nasal cavity [32]. This growth pattern may be explained by topographic aspects as the lactotrophs are mainly located in the caudal part of the pituitary gland. Similarly, GH-secreting adenomas expand preferentially into the infrasellar space [33]. Prolactinomas are also known to invade diffusely the cavernous sinus and the clivus or skull base [30].
Effective treatment of invasive giant prolactinoma with dopamine agonists resulting in rapid tumor shrinkage may expose the eroded dura and skull base formerly plugged by adenoma masses [34]. In accordance with this, our three patients had substantial infrasellar invasion, and CSF leakage occurred shortly (4 to 6 weeks) after the initiation of cabergoline treatment.
The true incidence of dopamine agonist therapy-induced CSF leakage in macroprolactinomas has not been fully elucidated. While it is not mentioned in large follow-up studies on prolactinoma treatment and it is reported usually only in the form of case reports, studies concentrating on the subject in small series indicate that it could occur in up to 8.7–13.3% of patients [18, 24, 28]. Discontinuation of dopamine agonist treatment has been suggested as an option for conservative management of CSF fistulae in macroprolactinoma [17]. This approach, however, might not be feasible in symptomatic patients. Therefore, a wait-and-see strategy with continued medication and close surveillance might be another option in patients unwilling to undergo surgery as exemplified in the case of patient 2 in our report.
Cabergoline-induced CSF leakage represents a potential side-effect of an excellent dopamine agonist response with major reduction in tumor size and serum prolactin level. Risk factors for the occurrence of CSF fistulae in macroprolactinomas include higher initial prolactin levels, and invasion of the cavernous sinus and the sphenoid sinus [26, 27].
Several options for surgical management of CSF leakage secondary to medication-induced shrinkage of macroprolactinomas have been suggested [28]. Transnasal-transsphenoidal approaches are being preferred, and endoscopic techniques have been used more frequently [14, 18, 35, 36]. The CSF leaks may be closed by fat grafts, fascia lata grafts or periostal nasoseptal flaps. Postoperative lumbar drainage has been commonly recommended, because reccurence after primary CSF leakage may thus be prevented [14, 37, 38].
There is little consensus on the management of medication-induced CSF leaks in prolactinomas. Nevertheless, there is no agreement about the timing of readministration of dopamine-agonist therapy and CSF rhinorrhea can reoccur making surgical revision necessary [39]. Regarding our two surgically managed cases, we may confirm the utility of a perioperative lumbar drain, however, a wait-and-see strategy with continued medication, as observed in one of our cases, may also lead to cessation of the CSF leak.
There is disagreement whether (partial) tumor resection should be performed upon the occasion of repair of the CSF leak [17, 28, 40]. In a recent publication three cases with medication-induced CSF leakage were reported, in which transnasal-transsphenoidal closure was performed. Partial tumor resection was performed to visualize the defect in the dura and the skull base to better achieve reconstruction and endoscopic closure [41]. It has been stated that tumor debulking in macroprolactinoma, in general, should be preserved for patients with dopamine agonist resistance characterized by inactive or absent D2-receptors [42]. Partial tumor resection at the time of CSF repair might have a negative effect since further tumor shrinkage is expected with continued medical treatment.
Carbogoline has replaced bromocriptine for treatment of prolactinomas [11, 16–18, 20, 22–24]. Interestingly, in comparison when bromocriptine was used for treatment CSF fistulae seemed to occur later [13, 15, 20, 43].
CSF leakage following prolactinoma size reduction has been described as the “uncorking effect” of dopamine agonist therapy unplugging an eroded part of the skull base [43]. With regard to the risk of meningitis it has been recommended to repair dural defects urgently. Interestingly, a case of a patient with frequent periods of CSF rhinorrhea refusing surgical repair has been reported without occurrence of infectious complications during a follow-up period of 4 years [22]. There is no agreement for the timing of repair to avoid the risk of life-threatening meningitis. However, the impact of meningitis on healing CSF leaks is a matter of debate. It was discussed that the inflammation may cause adhesions contributing to the cessation of the CSF rhinorrhea following dopamine-agonist therapy [44]. Nevertheless, CSF leakage repair is necessary in the vast majority of cases [2, 17]. According to a review by Lam and colleagues nonsurgical management of CSF leaks in patients with macroprolactinomas was successful in only 4/52 patients while 46/52 underwent surgical intervention [28]. Patients with medical treatment of macroprolactinomas should be informed about the potential hazardous complications of CSF rhinorrhea and should be monitored closely for CSF leakage.
There are several limitations of our study. First of all, the small sample size limits its generalizability. Second, the retrospective design may result in biased case-based conclusions.
Conclusions
Our study underpins the necessity to carefully monitor patients with macroprolactinomas for CSF rhinorrhea and its complications closely after medical treatment was started. Although dopamine agonist-induced CSF rhinorrhea might resolve spontaneously in exceptional cases, we recommend early surgical repair when a CSF leak has clearly been demonstrated by an endoscopic transnasal-transsphenoidal approach. Further studies on the usefulness of tumor removal at the time of CSF leak repair are necessary.
Author contributions
S.H. and E.J.H. shared first author. S.H. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and collected the data. E.J.H. edited and wrote the original draft. Formal analysis and investigation. All image selection and preparation. M.N. made study conception and design. C.T. made analysis and interpretation of data. T.M.K. edited the original draft. S.S. conducted the methodology and data evaluation. H.L. edited the manuscript and made analysis and interpretation of data. R.F. edited the original draft. J.K.K. made study conception and design, edited and supervised the study. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
There is no funding for this study.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Informed consent
Informed consent has been obtained from all individual participants included in this retrospective study.
Consent for publication
The authors affirm that human research participant provided informed consent for publication of the figures.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Elvis J. Hermann and Sabine Hertz contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Casanueva FF, Molitch ME, Schlechte JA, Abs R, Bonert V, Bronstein MD, Brue T, Cappabianca P, Colao A, Fahlbusch R, Fideleff H, Hadani M, Kelly P, Kleinberg D, Laws E, Marek J, Scanlon M, Sobrinho LG, Wass JAH, Giustina A (2006) Guidelines of the pituitary society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinolog (Oxf) 65:265–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02562.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gillam MP, Molitch ME, Lambardi G, Colao A (2006) Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev 27:485–534. 10.1210/er.2005-9998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ottenhausen M, Conrad J, Wolters LM, Ringel F (2023) Surgery as first-line treatment for prolactinoma? Discussion of the literature and results of a consecutive series of surgically treated patients. Neurosurg Rev 46(1):46128. 10.1007/s10143-023-02033-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Osorio RC, Haddad AF, Hart DM, Goldrich N, Badani A, Kabir AS, Juncker R, Oh JY, Carrete L, Peeran Z, Chalif EJ, Zheng AC, Braunstein S, Theodosopoulos PV, El-Sayed IH, Gurrola J, Kunwar S, Blevins LS, Aghi MK (2023) Socioeconomic differences between medically and surgically treated prolactinomas: a retrospective review of 598 patients. J Neurosurg 140(3):712–723. 10.3171/2023.6.JNS23570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Findlay MC, Sabahi M, Azab M, Drexler R, Rotermund R, Ricklefs FL, Flitsch J, Smith TR, Kilgallon JL, Honegger J, Nasi-Kordhishti I, Gardner PA, Gersey ZC, Abdallah HM, Jane JA, Knappe UJ, Uksul N, Schroder HWS, Eördögh M, Losa M, Mortini P, Gerlach R, Antunes ACM, Couldwell WT, Budohoski KP, Rennert RC, Karsy M (2014) The role of surgical management for prolactin-secreting tumors in the era of dopaminergic agonists: an international multicenter report. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 236:108079. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park JY, Choi W, Hong AR, Yoon JH, Kim HK, Jang WY, Jung S, Kang HC (2021) Surgery is a safe, effective first-line treatment modality for noninvasive prolactinomas. Pituitary 24(6):955–963. 10.1007/s11102-021-01168-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Zandbergen IM, de Vries F, Broersen LHA, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Pereira AM, Peul WC, Dekkers OM, van Furth WR, Biermasz NR (2020) Surgery as a viable alternative first-line treatment for prolactinoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(3):e32–41. 10.1210/clinem/dgz144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ferrari CI, Abs R, Bevan JS, Brabant G, Ciccarelli E, Motta T, Mucci M, Muratori M, Musatti L, Verbessem G, Scanlon MF (1997) Treatment of macroprolactinoma with Cabergoline: a study of 85 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:409–413. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1300952.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, Wass JAH (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:273–288. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bevan JS, Webster J, Burke CW, Scanlon MF (1992) Dopamine agonists and pituitary tumor shrinkage. Endocr Rev 13:220–240. 10.1210/edrv-13-2-220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Corsello SM, Ubertini G, Altomare M, Lovicu RM, Migneco MG, Rota CA, Colosimo C (2003) Giant prolactinomas in men: efficacy of Cabergoline treatment. Clin Endocrinol 58:662–670. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01770.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Irfan H, Shafiq W, Siddiqi AI, Ashfaq S, Attaullah S, Munir Alvi A, Khan SA, Abu Bakar M, Azmat U (2022) Prolactinoma: clinical characteristics, management and outcome. Cureus 2(10):14. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Afshar F, Thomas A (1982) Bromocriptine-induced cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Surg Neurol 18:61–63. https://doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(82)90020-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arimappamagan A, Sadashiva N, Kandregula S, Shukla D, Somanna S (2019) CSF rhinorrhea following medical treatment for prolactinoma: management and challenges. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 80(6):620–625. 10.1055/s-0039-1677686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Barlas O, Bayindir C, Hepgül K, Can M, Kiris T, Sencer E, Ünal F, Aral F (1994) Bromocriptine-induced cerebrospinal fluid fistula in patients with macroprolactinomas: report of three cases and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol 41:486–489. 10.1016/0090-3019(94)90013-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cappabianca P, Lodrini S, Felisati G, Peca C, Cozzi R, Di Sarno A, Cavallo LM, Giombini S, Colao A (2001) Cabergoline-induced CSF rhinorrhea in patients with macroprolactinoma. Report of three cases. J Endocrinol Invest 24:183–187. 10.1007/BF03343840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Česák T, Poczos P, Adamkov J, Náhlovský J, Kašparová P, Gabalec F, Čelakovský P, Choutka O (2018) Medically induced CSF rhinorrhea following treatment of macroprolactinoma: case series and literature review. Pituitary 21(6):561–570. 10.1007/s11102-018-0907-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Lacy P, Benjamin S, Dixon R, Stephens JW, Redfern R, Price DE (2009) Is surgical intervention frequently required for medically managed macroprolactinomas? A study of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Surg Neurol 72:461–463. 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hildebrandt G, Zierski J, Christophis P, Laun A, Schatz H, Lancranjan I, Klug N (1989) Rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist therapy of invasive macroprolactinoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 96:107–113. 10.1007/BF01456167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leong KS, Foy PM, Swift AC, Atkin SL, Hadden DR, MacFarlane IA (2000) CSF rhinorrhoea following treatment with dopamine agonists for massive invasive prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol 52:43–49. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.00901.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nadesapillai N, Balcere I, Kaye AH, Tress BM, Colman PG (2004) Acute complications of dopamine agonist treatment for macroprolactinoma– how uncommon? J Clin Neurosci 11:825–828. 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Netea-Maier RT, van Lindert EJ, Timmers H, Schakenraad EL, Grotenhuis JA, Hermus AR (2006) Cerebrospinal fluid leakage as complication of treatment with Cabergoline for macroprolactinomas. J Endocrinol Invest 29:1001–1005. 10.1007/BF03349214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Prague JK, Ward CL, Mustafa OG, Whitelaw BC, King A, Thomas NW, Gilbert J (2014) Delayed presentation of late-onset cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist therapy for giant prolactinoma. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep 2014:140020. https://doi: 10.1530/EDM-14-0020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Suliman SGI, Gurlek A, Byrne JV, Sullivan N, Thanabalasingham G, Cudlip S, Ansorge O, Wass JAH (2007) Nonsurgical cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in invasive macroprolactinoma: incidence, radiological, and clinicopathological features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:3829–3835. https://doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu ZR, Zhang Y, Cai L, Lin SJ, Su ZP, Wei YX, Shang HB, Yang WL, Zhao WG, Wu ZB (2016) Long-term clinical outcomes of invasive giant prolactinomas after a mean ten-year followup. Int J Endocrinol 2016: 8580750. 10.1155/2016/8580750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Kim HK, Hong JW, Moon JH, Ahn SS, Kim EH, Lee SK, Lee EJ, Park YW, Ku CR (2021) Efficacy and cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after cabergoline treatment in patients with bioactive macroprolactinoma. Cancers (Basel) 26;13(21): 5374. 10.3390/cancers13215374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Milton CK, Lee BJ, Voronovich ZA, Conner AK, McKinney KA, El Rassi ET, Lim J, Glenn CA (2021) Prolactinoma extension as a contributing factor in dopamine agonist-induced CSF rhinorrhea: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 37(5):976–981. https://doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lam G, Mehta V, Zada G (2012) Spontaneous and medically induced cerebrospinal fluid leakage in the setting of pituitary adenomas: review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 32(6):E2. 10.3171/2012.4.FOCUS1268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saeger W (1992) Effect of drugs on pituitary ultrastructure. Microsc Res Tech 20:162–176. https.// [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lundin P, Nyman R, Burman P, Lundberg PO, Muhr C (1992) MRI of pituitary macroadenomas with reference to hormonal activity. Neuroradiology 34:43–51. 10.1007/BF00588432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Selman WR, Laws ER Jr, Scheithauer BW, Carpenter SM (1986) The occurrence of dural invasion in pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 64:402–407. 10.3171/jns.1986.64.3.0402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Scheithauer BW, Kovacs KT, Laws ER Jr, Randall RV (1986) Pathology of invasive pituitary tumors with special reference to functional classification. J Neurosurg 65:733–744. 10.3171/jns.1986.65.6.0733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zada G, Lin N, Laws ER Jr (2010) Patterns of extrasellar extensions in growth hormone-secreting and non-functional pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurg Focus 29(4):E4. 10.3171/2010.7.FOCUS10155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Landolt AM (1982) Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: a complication of therapy for invasive prolactinomas. Neurosurgery 11(3):395–401. 10.1227/00006123-198209000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tamasauskas A, Sinkūnas K, Draf W, Deltuva V, Matukevicius A, Rastenyte D, Vaitkus S (2008) Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak after surgical removal of pituitary adenomas. Med (Kaunas) 44(4):302–307.https://doi.org/PMID:18469507 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thakur B, Jesurasa AR, Ross R, Carroll TA, Mirza S, Sinha S (2011) Transnasal trans-sphenoidal endoscopic repair of CSF leak secondary to invasive pituitary tumours using a nasoseptal flap. Pituitary 14(2):163–167. 10.1007/s11102-010-0274-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu B, Wang Y, Zheng T, Liu S, Lv W, Lu D, Chen L, Chen L, Ma T, Gao G, Qu Y, He S (2020) Effect of intraoperative lumbar drainage on gross total resection and cerebrospinal fluid leak rates in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary macroadenomas. World Neurosurg 135:e629–e639. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zwagerman NT, Wang EW, Shin SS, Chang YF, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2018) Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakafter endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 1:1–7. 10.3171/2018.4.JNS172447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Abe D, Ogiwara T, Nakamura T, Ichinose S, Fujii Y, Hanaoka Y, Ito K, Horiuchi T (2020) Treatment strategy for giant invasive macroprolactinoma with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 144:19–23. 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kalinin PL, Shkarubo AN, Astafieva LI, Chernov IV, Ismailov DB, Kadashev BA, Fomichev DV, Kutin MA, Sharipov OI, Andreev DN, Fomochkina LA (2017) Nazal’naia likvoreia pri pervichnom lechenii bol’shikh i gigantskikh prolaktinom agonistami dofamina [Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in primary treatment of large and giant prolactinomas with dopamine agonists]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 81 (6): 32–39. Russian. 10.17116/neiro201781632-39 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Rotariu DI, Costachescu B, Ungureanu MC, Eva L, Leustean L, Preda C, Cristea C, Iliescu BF (2024) The place of surgery in the management of prolactin secreting adenomas. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) 20(1):65–73. https://doi: 10.4183/aeb.2024.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stefaneanu L, Kovacs K, Horvage E, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Lancraigan I (2001) Dopamine D2 receptor gene expression in human adenohypophyseal adenomas. Endocrine 14:329–336. https://doi: 10.1007/BF01605931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Singh P, Singh M, Cugati G, Singh AK (2011) Bromocriptine or cabergoline-induced cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A life-threating complication during management of prolactinoma. J Hum Reprod Sci 4:04–105. 10.4103/0974-1208.86096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mankia SK, Weerakkody RA, Wijesuriya S, Kandasamy N, Finucane F, Guilfoyle M, Antoun N, Pickard J, Gurnell M (2009) Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea as the presenting feature of an invasive macroprolactinoma. BMJ Case Rep Bcr. 12.2008.1383. https://doi: 10.1136/bcr.12.2008.1383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.



