Abstract
One of the most important parameters in population genetics is θ = 4N(e)μ where N(e) is the effective population size and μ is the rate of mutation per gene per generation. We study two related problems, using the maximum likelihood method and the theory of coalescence. One problem is the potential improvement of accuracy in estimating the parameter θ over existing methods and the other is the estimation of parameter λ which is the ratio of two θ's. The minimum variances of estimates of the parameter θ are derived under two idealized situations. These minimum variances serve as the lower bounds of the variances of all possible estimates of θ in practice. We then show that Watterson's estimate of θ based on the number of segregating sites is asymptotically an optimal estimate of θ. However, for a finite sample of sequences, substantial improvement over Watterson's estimate is possible when θ is large. The maximum likelihood estimate of λ = θ(1)/θ(2) is obtained and the properties of the estimate are discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (742.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Felsenstein J. Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: inefficiency of pairwise and segregating sites as compared to phylogenetic estimates. Genet Res. 1992 Apr;59(2):139–147. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300030354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffiths R. C. Genealogical-tree probabilities in the infinitely-many-site model. J Math Biol. 1989;27(6):667–680. doi: 10.1007/BF00276949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strobeck C. Estimation of the neutral mutation rate in a finite population from DNA sequence data. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Oct;24(2):160–172. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90039-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]