Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Oct;135(2):599–607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.599

Simple Methods for Testing the Molecular Evolutionary Clock Hypothesis

F Tajima 1
PMCID: PMC1205659  PMID: 8244016

Abstract

Simple statistical methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis are developed which can be applied to both nucleotide and amino acid sequences. These methods are based on the chi-square test and are applicable even when the pattern of substitution rates is unknown and/or the substitution rate varies among different sites. Furthermore, some of the methods can be applied even when the outgroup is unknown. Using computer simulations, these methods were compared with the likelihood ratio test and the relative rate test. The results indicate that the powers of the present methods are similar to those of the likelihood ratio test and the relative rate test, in spite of the fact that the latter two tests assume that the pattern of substitution rates follows a certain model and that the substitution rate is the same among different sites, while such assumptions are not necessary to apply the present methods. Therefore, the present methods might be useful.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (728.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Easteal S. The pattern of mammalian evolution and the relative rate of molecular evolution. Genetics. 1990 Jan;124(1):165–173. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Graur D., Hide W. A., Li W. H. Is the guinea-pig a rodent? Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):649–652. doi: 10.1038/351649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horai S., Satta Y., Hayasaka K., Kondo R., Inoue T., Ishida T., Hayashi S., Takahata N. Man's place in Hominoidea revealed by mitochondrial DNA genealogy. J Mol Evol. 1992 Jul;35(1):32–43. doi: 10.1007/BF00160258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jin L., Nei M. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 1990 Jan;7(1):82–102. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li W. H., Gouy M., Sharp P. M., O'hUigin C., Yang Y. W. Molecular phylogeny of Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla, and Carnivora and molecular clocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(17):6703–6707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu C. I., Li W. H. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(6):1741–1745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES