Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Dec;135(4):1175–1186. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1175

Integration of the Classical and Molecular Linkage Maps of Tomato Chromosome 6

R Weide 1, M F van-Wordragen 1, R K Lankhorst 1, R Verkerk 1, C Hanhart 1, T Liharska 1, E Pap 1, P Stam 1, P Zabel 1, M Koornneef 1
PMCID: PMC1205748  PMID: 7905845

Abstract

In the past, a classical map of the tomato genome has been established that is based on linkage data from intraspecific Lycopersicon esculentum crosses. In addition, a high density molecular linkage map has recently been constructed using a L. esculentum X L. pennellii cross. As the respective maps only partially match, they provide limited information about the relative positions of classical and molecular markers. In this paper we describe the construction of an integrated linkage map of tomato chromosome 6 that shows the position of cDNA-, genomic DNA- and RAPD markers relative to 10 classical markers. Integration was achieved by using a L. esculentum line containing an introgressed chromosome 6 from L. pennellii in crosses to a variety of L. esculentum marker lines. In addition, an improved version of the classical linkage map is presented that is based on a combined analysis of new linkage data for 16 morphological markers and literature data. Unlike the classical map currently in use, the revised map reveals clustering of markers into three major groups around the yv, m-2 and c loci, respectively. Although crossing-over rates are clearly different when comparing intraspecific L. esculentum crosses with L. esculentum X L. pennellii crosses, the clusters of morphological markers on the classical map coincide with clusters of genomic- and cDNA-markers on the molecular map constructed by Tanksley and coworkers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dickinson M. J., Jones D. A., Jones J. D. Close linkage between the Cf-2/Cf-5 and Mi resistance loci in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1993 May-Jun;6(3):341–347. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-6-341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ho J. Y., Weide R., Ma H. M., van Wordragen M. F., Lambert K. N., Koornneef M., Zabel P., Williamson V. M. The root-knot nematode resistance gene (Mi) in tomato: construction of a molecular linkage map and identification of dominant cDNA markers in resistant genotypes. Plant J. 1992 Nov;2(6):971–982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin G. B., Ganal M. W., Tanksley S. D. Construction of a yeast artificial chromosome library of tomato and identification of cloned segments linked to two disease resistance loci. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 May;233(1-2):25–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00587557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Martin G. B., Williams J. G., Tanksley S. D. Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 15;88(6):2336–2340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Osborne B. I., Corr C. A., Prince J. P., Hehl R., Tanksley S. D., McCormick S., Baker B. Ac transposition from a T-DNA can generate linked and unlinked clusters of insertions in the tomato genome. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):833–844. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paterson A. H., Damon S., Hewitt J. D., Zamir D., Rabinowitch H. D., Lincoln S. E., Lander E. S., Tanksley S. D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):181–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rick C. M. Controlled Introgression of Chromosomes of SOLANUM PENNELLII into LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM: Segregation and Recombination. Genetics. 1969 Aug;62(4):753–768. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.4.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rick C. M., Yoder J. I. Classical and molecular genetics of tomato: highlights and perspectives. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:281–300. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.001433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Segal G., Sarfatti M., Schaffer M. A., Ori N., Zamir D., Fluhr R. Correlation of genetic and physical structure in the region surrounding the I2 Fusarium oxysporum resistance locus in tomato. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Jan;231(2):179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF00279789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sherman J. D., Herickhoff L. A., Stack S. M. Silver staining two types of meiotic nodules. Genome. 1992 Dec;35(6):907–915. doi: 10.1139/g92-140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Welsh J., McClelland M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7213–7218. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.24.7213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wicking C., Williamson B. From linked marker to gene. Trends Genet. 1991 Sep;7(9):288–293. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90310-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams J. G., Kubelik A. R., Livak K. J., Rafalski J. A., Tingey S. V. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531–6535. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Young N. D., Zamir D., Ganal M. W., Tanksley S. D. Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to the tm-2a gene in tomato. Genetics. 1988 Oct;120(2):579–585. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.2.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES