Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Jan;136(1):261–279. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.261

Distribution of Unlinked Receptor Sites for Transposed Ac Elements from the Bz-M2(ac) Allele in Maize

H K Dooner 1, A Belachew 1, D Burgess 1, S Harding 1, M Ralston 1, E Ralston 1
PMCID: PMC1205778  PMID: 8138163

Abstract

We have shown before that the Ac element from the maize bz-m2(Ac) allele, located in the short arm of chromosome 9 (9S), transposes preferentially to sites that are linked to the bz donor locus. Yet, about half of the Ac transpositions recovered from bz-m2(Ac) are in receptor sites not linked to the donor locus. In this study, we have analyzed the distribution of those unlinked receptor sites. Thirty-seven transposed Ac (trAc) elements that recombined independently of the bz locus were mapped using a set of wx reciprocal translocations. We found that the distribution of unlinked receptor sites for trAs was not random. Ten trAcs mapped to 9L, i.e., Ac had transposed to sites physically, if not genetically, linked to the donor site. Among chromosomes other than 9, the Ac element of bz-m2(Ac) appeared to have transposed preferentially to certain chromosomes, such as 5 and 7, but infrequently to others, such as 1, the longest chromosome in the maize genome. The seven trAc elements in chromosome 5 were mapped relative to markers in 5S and 5L and localized to both arms of 5. We also investigated the transposition of Ac to the homolog of the donor chromosome. We found that Ac rarely transposes from bz-m2(Ac) to the homologous chromosome 9. The clustering of Ac receptor sites around the donor locus has been taken to mean that a physical association between the donor site and nearby receptor sites occurs during transposition. The preferential occurrence of 9L among chromosomes harboring unlinked receptor sites would be expected according to this model, since sites in 9L would tend to be physically closer to 9S than sites in other chromosomes. The nonrandom pattern seen among the remaining chromosomes could reflect an underlying nuclear architecture, i.e., an ordering of the chromosomes in the interphase nucleus, as suggested from previous cytological observations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belzile F., Yoder J. I. Pattern of somatic transposition in a high copy Ac tomato line. Plant J. 1992 Mar;2(2):173–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brink R. A., Williams E. Mutable R-navajo alleles of cyclic origin in maize. Genetics. 1973 Feb;73(2):273–296. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen J., Greenblatt I. M., Dellaporta S. L. Molecular analysis of Ac transposition and DNA replication. Genetics. 1992 Mar;130(3):665–676. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.3.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J., Greenblatt I. M., Dellaporta S. L. Transposition of Ac from the P locus of maize into unreplicated chromosomal sites. Genetics. 1987 Sep;117(1):109–116. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dooner H. K., Belachew A. Transposition Pattern of the Maize Element Ac from the Bz-M2(ac) Allele. Genetics. 1989 Jun;122(2):447–457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.2.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dooner H. K., English J., Ralston E. J. The frequency of transposition of the maize element Activator is not affected by an adjacent deletion. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Mar;211(3):485–491. doi: 10.1007/BF00425705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dooner H. K. Genetic Fine Structure of the BRONZE Locus in Maize. Genetics. 1986 Aug;113(4):1021–1036. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.4.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dooner H. K., Keller J., Harper E., Ralston E. Variable Patterns of Transposition of the Maize Element Activator in Tobacco. Plant Cell. 1991 May;3(5):473–482. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.5.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dooner H., English J., Ralston E., Weck E. A single genetic unit specifies two transposition functions in the maize element activator. Science. 1986 Oct 10;234(4773):210–211. doi: 10.1126/science.234.4773.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenblatt I M, Brink R A. Twin Mutations in Medium Variegated Pericarp Maize. Genetics. 1962 Apr;47(4):489–501. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.4.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heslop-Harrison J. S., Bennett M. D. Nuclear architecture in plants. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):401–405. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90300-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones J. D., Carland F., Lim E., Ralston E., Dooner H. K. Preferential transposition of the maize element Activator to linked chromosomal locations in tobacco. Plant Cell. 1990 Aug;2(8):701–707. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.8.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laufs J., Wirtz U., Kammann M., Matzeit V., Schaefer S., Schell J., Czernilofsky A. P., Baker B., Gronenborn B. Wheat dwarf virus Ac/Ds vectors: expression and excision of transposable elements introduced into various cereals by a viral replicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7752–7756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osborne B. I., Corr C. A., Prince J. P., Hehl R., Tanksley S. D., McCormick S., Baker B. Ac transposition from a T-DNA can generate linked and unlinked clusters of insertions in the tomato genome. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):833–844. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ralston E. J., English J. J., Dooner H. K. Sequence of three bronze alleles of maize and correlation with the genetic fine structure. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):185–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES