Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Feb;136(2):607–617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.607

The Effects of Insertions on Mammalian Intrachromosomal Recombination

A R Godwin 1, R M Liskay 1
PMCID: PMC1205812  PMID: 8150287

Abstract

We examined the effects of insertion mutations on intrachromosomal recombination. A series of mouse L cell lines carrying mutant herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (tk) heteroalleles was generated; these lines differed in the nature of their insertion mutations. In direct repeat lines with different large insertions in each gene, there was a 20-fold drop in gene conversion rate and only a five-fold drop in crossover rate relative to the analogous rates in lines with small insertions in each gene. Surprisingly, in direct repeat lines carrying the same large insertion in each gene, there was a larger drop in both types of recombination. When intrachromosomal recombination between inverted repeat tk genes with different large insertions was examined, we found that the rate of gene conversion dropped five-fold relative to small insertions, while the rate of crossing over was unaffected. The differential effects on conversion and crossing over imply that gene conversion is more sensitive to insertion mutation size. Finally, the fraction of gene conversions associated with a crossover increased from 2% for inverted repeats with small insertions to 18% for inverted repeats with large insertions. One interpretation of this finding is that during intrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells long conversion tracts are more often associated with crossing over.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. Genetic and molecular analysis of recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurring in the presence of the hyper-recombination mutation hpr1. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):503–517. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. HPR1, a novel yeast gene that prevents intrachromosomal excision recombination, shows carboxy-terminal homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TOP1 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;10(4):1439–1451. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.4.1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):683–694. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahn B. Y., Livingston D. M. Mitotic gene conversion lengths, coconversion patterns, and the incidence of reciprocal recombination in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid system. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3685–3693. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bollag R. J., Liskay R. M. Conservative intrachromosomal recombination between inverted repeats in mouse cells: association between reciprocal exchange and gene conversion. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):161–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bollag R. J., Liskay R. M. Direct-repeat analysis of chromatid interactions during intrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):4839–4845. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.4839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):69–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Capecchi M. R. High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):479–488. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90358-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Capizzi R. L., Jameson J. W. A table for the estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate of cells in culture. Mutat Res. 1973 Jan;17(1):147–148. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(73)90265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Golub E. I., Low K. B. Indirect stimulation of genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Mar;80(5):1401–1405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.5.1401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyrien O., Debatisse M., Buttin G., de Saint Vincent B. R. The multicopy appearance of a large inverted duplication and the sequence at the inversion joint suggest a new model for gene amplification. EMBO J. 1988 Feb;7(2):407–417. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02828.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):306–311. doi: 10.1038/292306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Letsou A., Liskay R. M. Effect of the molecular nature of mutation on the efficiency of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mouse cells. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):759–769. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liskay R. M., Evans R. J. Inactive X chromosome DNA does not function in DNA-mediated cell transformation for the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4895–4898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liskay R. M., Stachelek J. L. Information transfer between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells involves contiguous regions of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1802–1806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liskay R. M., Stachelek J. L., Letsou A. Homologous recombination between repeated chromosomal sequences in mouse cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:183–189. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma C., Martin S., Trask B., Hamlin J. L. Sister chromatid fusion initiates amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in Chinese hamster cells. Genes Dev. 1993 Apr;7(4):605–620. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.4.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McCormack W. T., Thompson C. B. Chicken IgL variable region gene conversions display pseudogene donor preference and 5' to 3' polarity. Genes Dev. 1990 Apr;4(4):548–558. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.4.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nalbantoglu J., Meuth M. DNA amplification--deletion in a spontaneous mutation of the hamster aprt locus: structure and sequence of the novel joint. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Nov 11;14(21):8361–8371. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.21.8361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ROMAN H., JACOB F. A comparison of spontaneous and ultraviolet-induced allelic recombination with reference to the recombination of outside markers. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:155–160. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1958.023.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruiz J. C., Wahl G. M. Formation of an inverted duplication can be an initial step in gene amplification. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;8(10):4302–4313. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.10.4302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwartz S., Palmer C. G., Weaver D. D., Priest J. Dicentric chromosome 13 and centromere inactivation. Hum Genet. 1983;63(4):332–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00274757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vincent A., Petes T. D. Mitotic and meiotic gene conversion of Ty elements and other insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):759–772. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Windle B., Draper B. W., Yin Y. X., O'Gorman S., Wahl G. M. A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration. Genes Dev. 1991 Feb;5(2):160–174. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.2.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES