Abstract
The effects of inbreeding on heterozygosities and reproductive fitness were determined by carrying out full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster populations for up to 18 generations. Parents were scored each generation for five or six polymorphic enzyme loci, and progeny numbers per pair were recorded. Inbreeding depression, in the form of significant reductions in progeny numbers and significant extinction of lines, was observed. Heterozygosity decreased at a significantly slower rate than predicted, being about 80% of expected. The full-sib and double first-cousin treatments showed similar disagreement with expectations over comparable ranges of inbreeding. Natural selection was shown to favor heterozygotes in the inbred lines. Associative overdominance was the most probable explanation for the slower than expected decline in heterozygosity.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (940.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- CLARINGBOLD P. J., BARKER J. S. The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. J Theor Biol. 1961 Apr;1:190–203. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(61)90045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eriksson K., Halkka O., Lokki J., Saura A. Enzyme polymorphism in feral, outbred and inbred rats (Rattus norvegicus). Heredity (Edinb) 1976 Dec;37(3):341–349. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1976.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franklin I. R. The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Feb;11(1):60–80. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubby J L. Protein Differences in Drosophila. I. Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1963 Jun;48(6):871–879. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.6.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mina N. S., Sheldon B. L., Yoo B. H., Frankham R. Heterozygosity at protein loci in inbred and outbred lines of chickens. Poult Sci. 1991 Sep;70(9):1864–1872. doi: 10.3382/ps.0701864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ota T. Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet Res. 1971 Dec;18(3):277–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ota T., Cockerham C. C. Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus. Genet Res. 1974 Apr;23(2):191–200. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300014816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REEVE E. C., GOWER J. C. Inbreeding with selection and linkage. II. Sibmating. Ann Hum Genet. 1958 Nov;23(1):36–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1958.tb01440.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REEVE E. C. Inbreeding with the homozygotes at a disadvantage. Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Jun;19(4):332–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sing C. F., Brewer G. J., Thirtle B. Inherited biochemical variation in Drosophila melanogaster: noise or signal? I. Single-locus analysis. Genetics. 1973 Oct;75(2):381–404. doi: 10.1093/genetics/75.2.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strauss S. H. Heterosis at Allozyme Loci under Inbreeding and Crossbreeding in PINUS ATTENUATA. Genetics. 1986 May;113(1):115–134. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strobeck C. Partial selfing and linkage: the effect of a heterotic locus on a neutral locus. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):305–315. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Mixed self and random mating at two loci. Genet Res. 1973 Jun;21(3):247–262. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300013446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]