Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Mar;136(3):1121–1141. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.1121

Variegated Phenotype and Developmental Methylation Changes of a Maize Allele Originating from Epimutation

O P Das 1, J Messing 1
PMCID: PMC1205868  PMID: 8005419

Abstract

Two instances of genetic transmission of spontaneous epimutation of the maize P-rr gene were identified. Transmission gave rise to two similar, moderately stable alleles, designated P-pr-1 and P-pr-2, that exhibited Mendelian behavior. Both isolates of P-pr conditioned a variable and variegated phenotype, unlike the uniform pigmentation conditioned by P-rr. Extensive genomic analysis failed to reveal insertions, deletions or restriction site polymorphisms between the new allele and its progenitor. However, methylation of the P gene was increased in P-pr relative to P-rr, and was greatly reduced (though not lost) in a revertant to uniform pigmentation. Variability in pigmentation conditioned by P-pr correlated with variability in transcript levels of the P gene, and both correlated inversely with variability in its methylation. Part of the variability in methylation could be accounted for by a developmental decrease in methylation in all tissues of plants carrying P-pr. We hypothesize that the variegated phenotype results from a general epigenetic pathway which causes a progressive decrease in methylation and increase in expression potential of the P gene as a function of cell divisions in each meristem of the plant. This renders all tissues chimeric for a functional gene; chimerism is visualized as variegation only in pericarp due to the tissue specificity of P gene expression. Therefore, this allele that originates from epimutation may exemplify an epigenetic mechanism for variegation in maize.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (19.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amasino R. M., Powell A. L., Gordon M. P. Changes in T-DNA methylation and expression are associated with phenotypic variation and plant regeneration in a crown gall tumor line. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(3):437–446. doi: 10.1007/BF00329940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Athma P., Grotewold E., Peterson T. Insertional mutagenesis of the maize P gene by intragenic transposition of Ac. Genetics. 1992 May;131(1):199–209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Athma P., Peterson T. Ac induces homologous recombination at the maize P locus. Genetics. 1991 May;128(1):163–173. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Banks J. A., Masson P., Fedoroff N. Molecular mechanisms in the developmental regulation of the maize Suppressor-mutator transposable element. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1364–1380. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benner M. S., Das O. P., Messing J. Cytological aberrations in maize populations exhibiting unusual recombinational behaviour. Cytobios. 1992;70(282-283):203–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bestor T. H., Ingram V. M. Two DNA methyltransferases from murine erythroleukemia cells: purification, sequence specificity, and mode of interaction with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5559–5563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bird A. The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell. 1992 Jul 10;70(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90526-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brettell R. I., Dennis E. S. Reactivation of a silent Ac following tissue culture is associated with heritable alterations in its methylation pattern. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Oct;229(3):365–372. doi: 10.1007/BF00267457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brink R. A. Paramutation. Annu Rev Genet. 1973;7:129–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.001021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burn J. E., Bagnall D. J., Metzger J. D., Dennis E. S., Peacock W. J. DNA methylation, vernalization, and the initiation of flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 1;90(1):287–291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.1.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen J., Maxson R., Jones P. A. Direct induction of DNA hypermethylation in sea urchin embryos by microinjection of 5-methyl dCTP stimulates early histone gene expression and leads to developmental arrest. Dev Biol. 1993 Jan;155(1):75–86. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomet P. S., Wessler S., Dellaporta S. L. Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is associated with its DNA modification. EMBO J. 1987 Feb;6(2):295–302. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04753.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cocciolone S. M., Cone K. C. Pl-Bh, an anthocyanin regulatory gene of maize that leads to variegated pigmentation. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):575–588. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coe E. H. The properties, origin, and mechanism of conversion-type inheritance at the B locus in maize. Genetics. 1966 Jun;53(6):1035–1063. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.6.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Das O. P., Levi-Minzi S., Koury M., Benner M., Messing J. A somatic gene rearrangement contributing to genetic diversity in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(20):7809–7813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.7809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Das O. P., Ward K., Ray S., Messing J. Sequence variation between alleles reveals two types of copy correction at the 27-kDa zein locus of maize. Genomics. 1991 Dec;11(4):849–856. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fedoroff N., Masson P., Banks J. A. Mutations, epimutations, and the developmental programming of the maize Suppressor-mutator transposable element. Bioessays. 1989 May;10(5):139–144. doi: 10.1002/bies.950100502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Frommer M., McDonald L. E., Millar D. S., Collis C. M., Watt F., Grigg G. W., Molloy P. L., Paul C. L. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 1;89(5):1827–1831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gardiner-Garden M., Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 20;196(2):261–282. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grotewold E., Athma P., Peterson T. A possible hot spot for Ac insertion in the maize P gene. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Nov;230(1-2):329–331. doi: 10.1007/BF00290684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grotewold E., Athma P., Peterson T. Alternatively spliced products of the maize P gene encode proteins with homology to the DNA-binding domain of myb-like transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4587–4591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gruenbaum Y., Naveh-Many T., Cedar H., Razin A. Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature. 1981 Aug 27;292(5826):860–862. doi: 10.1038/292860a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kafri T., Ariel M., Brandeis M., Shemer R., Urven L., McCarrey J., Cedar H., Razin A. Developmental pattern of gene-specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germ line. Genes Dev. 1992 May;6(5):705–714. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.5.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kermicle J. L., Alleman M. Gametic imprinting in maize in relation to the angiosperm life cycle. Dev Suppl. 1990:9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kermicle J. L. Dependence of the R-mottled aleurone phenotype in maize on mode of sexual transmission. Genetics. 1970 Sep;66(1):69–85. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kilby N. J., Leyser H. M., Furner I. J. Promoter methylation and progressive transgene inactivation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Oct;20(1):103–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00029153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lechelt C., Peterson T., Laird A., Chen J., Dellaporta S. L., Dennis E., Peacock W. J., Starlinger P. Isolation and molecular analysis of the maize P locus. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Oct;219(1-2):225–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00261181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li E., Bestor T. H., Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell. 1992 Jun 12;69(6):915–926. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lock L. F., Takagi N., Martin G. R. Methylation of the Hprt gene on the inactive X occurs after chromosome inactivation. Cell. 1987 Jan 16;48(1):39–46. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90353-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyon M. F. Epigenetic inheritance in mammals. Trends Genet. 1993 Apr;9(4):123–128. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90206-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Martienssen R., Barkan A., Taylor W. C., Freeling M. Somatically heritable switches in the DNA modification of Mu transposable elements monitored with a suppressible mutant in maize. Genes Dev. 1990 Mar;4(3):331–343. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.3.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Matzke M. A., Primig M., Trnovsky J., Matzke A. J. Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):643–649. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03421.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Meehan R. R., Lewis J. D., McKay S., Kleiner E. L., Bird A. P. Identification of a mammalian protein that binds specifically to DNA containing methylated CpGs. Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):499–507. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90430-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meyer P., Linn F., Heidmann I., Meyer H., Niedenhof I., Saedler H. Endogenous and environmental factors influence 35S promoter methylation of a maize A1 gene construct in transgenic petunia and its colour phenotype. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Feb;231(3):345–352. doi: 10.1007/BF00292701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moreno M. A., Chen J., Greenblatt I., Dellaporta S. L. Reconstitutional mutagenesis of the maize P gene by short-range Ac transpositions. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):939–956. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mueller P. R., Wold B. In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation mediated PCR. Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):780–786. doi: 10.1126/science.2814500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Napoli C., Lemieux C., Jorgensen R. Introduction of a Chimeric Chalcone Synthase Gene into Petunia Results in Reversible Co-Suppression of Homologous Genes in trans. Plant Cell. 1990 Apr;2(4):279–289. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.4.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Orton E. R., Brink R. A. Reconstitution of the variegated pericarp allele in maize by transposition of modulator back to the p locus. Genetics. 1966 Jan;53(1):7–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Peterson T. Intragenic transposition of Ac generates a new allele of the maize P gene. Genetics. 1990 Oct;126(2):469–476. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.2.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pfeifer G. P., Riggs A. D. Chromatin differences between active and inactive X chromosomes revealed by genomic footprinting of permeabilized cells using DNase I and ligation-mediated PCR. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):1102–1113. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):923–930. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Razin A., Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol Rev. 1991 Sep;55(3):451–458. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.451-458.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rhounim L., Rossignol J. L., Faugeron G. Epimutation of repeated genes in Ascobolus immersus. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(12):4451–4457. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05546.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Riggs A. D., Pfeifer G. P. X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory. Trends Genet. 1992 May;8(5):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90219-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schwarz-Sommer Z., Shepherd N., Tacke E., Gierl A., Rohde W., Leclercq L., Mattes M., Berndtgen R., Peterson P. A., Saedler H. Influence of transposable elements on the structure and function of the A1 gene of Zea mays. EMBO J. 1987 Feb;6(2):287–294. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04752.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Selker E. U. DNA methylation and chromatin structure: a view from below. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Mar;15(3):103–107. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90193-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shaffer C. D., Wallrath L. L., Elgin S. C. Regulating genes by packaging domains: bits of heterochromatin in euchromatin? Trends Genet. 1993 Feb;9(2):35–37. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90171-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Villemur R., Joyce C. M., Haas N. A., Goddard R. H., Kopczak S. D., Hussey P. J., Snustad D. P., Silflow C. D. Alpha-tubulin gene family of maize (Zea mays L.). Evidence for two ancient alpha-tubulin genes in plants. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 5;227(1):81–96. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90683-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Watt F., Molloy P. L. Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of a HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Genes Dev. 1988 Sep;2(9):1136–1143. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.9.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. van der Krol A. R., Mur L. A., Beld M., Mol J. N., Stuitje A. R. Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell. 1990 Apr;2(4):291–299. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.4.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES