Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Mar;136(3):709–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.709

DNA Sequence Effects on Single Base Deletions Arising during DNA Polymerization in Vitro by Escherichia Coli Klenow Fragment Polymerase

F J Wang 1, L S Ripley 1
PMCID: PMC1205878  PMID: 8005428

Abstract

Most single base deletions detected after DNA polymerization in vitro directed by either Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I or its Klenow fragment are opposite Pu in the template. The most frequent study, were previously found to be associated with the consensus template context 5'-PyTPu-3'. In this study, the predictive power of the consensus sequence on single base deletion frequencies was directly tested by parallel comparison of mutations arising in four related DNAs differing by a single base. G, a deletion hotspot within the template context 5'-TTGA-3', was substituted by each of the 3 other bases. Previous studies had shown that deletions opposite the G were frequent but that deletions opposite its neighboring A were never detected. Based on the predictions of the consensus, the substitution of T for G should produce frequent deletions opposite the neighboring A due to its new 5'-TTTA-3' template context. This prediction was fulfilled; no deletions of this A were detected in the other templates. The consensus further predicted that deletions opposite template C would be lower than those opposite either A or G at the same site and this prediction was also fulfilled. The C substitution also produced a new hotspot for 1 bp deletions 14 bp away. The new hotspot depends on quasi-palindromic misalignment of the newly synthesized DNA strand during polymerization; accurate, but ectopically templated synthesis is responsible for this mutagenesis. Mutations templated by quasi-palindromic misalignments have previously been recognized when they produced complex sequence changes; here we show that this mechanism can produce frequent single base deletions. The unique stimulation of misalignment mutagenesis by the C substitution in the template is consistent with the singular ability of C at that site to contribute to extended complementary pairing during the DNA misalignment that precedes mutagenesis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bebenek K., Joyce C. M., Fitzgerald M. P., Kunkel T. A. The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. J Biol Chem. 1990 Aug 15;265(23):13878–13887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman H. M., Sussman J. L., Joshua-Tor L., Revich G. G., Ripley L. S. A structural model for sequence-specific proflavin-DNA interactions during in vitro frameshift mutagenesis. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1992 Oct;10(2):317–331. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1992.10508650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farabaugh P. J., Schmeissner U., Hofer M., Miller J. H. Genetic studies of the lac repressor. VII. On the molecular nature of spontaneous hotspots in the lacI gene of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1978 Dec 25;126(4):847–857. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90023-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hampsey D. M., Ernst J. F., Stewart J. W., Sherman F. Multiple base-pair mutations in yeast. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jun 5;201(3):471–486. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90629-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Joyce C. M., Sun X. C., Grindley N. D. Reactions at the polymerase active site that contribute to the fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment). J Biol Chem. 1992 Dec 5;267(34):24485–24500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunkel T. A., Hamatake R. K., Motto-Fox J., Fitzgerald M. P., Sugino A. Fidelity of DNA polymerase I and the DNA polymerase I-DNA primase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4447–4458. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kunkel T. A. Misalignment-mediated DNA synthesis errors. Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 4;29(35):8003–8011. doi: 10.1021/bi00487a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kunkel T. A., Soni A. Exonucleolytic proofreading enhances the fidelity of DNA synthesis by chick embryo DNA polymerase-gamma. J Biol Chem. 1988 Mar 25;263(9):4450–4459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kunkel T. A. The mutational specificity of DNA polymerase-beta during in vitro DNA synthesis. Production of frameshift, base substitution, and deletion mutations. J Biol Chem. 1985 May 10;260(9):5787–5796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kunkel T. A. The mutational specificity of DNA polymerases-alpha and -gamma during in vitro DNA synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1985 Oct 15;260(23):12866–12874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Masker W., Crissey M. A. The effect of the 3'-->5' exonuclease of T7 DNA polymerase on frameshifts and deletions. Mutat Res. 1993 Apr;301(4):235–241. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(93)90063-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meuth M. The structure of mutation in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Jun 1;1032(1):1–17. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(90)90009-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Papanicolaou C., Ripley L. S. An in vitro approach to identifying specificity determinants of mutagenesis mediated by DNA misalignments. J Mol Biol. 1991 Oct 5;221(3):805–821. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80177-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Papanicolaou C., Ripley L. S. Polymerase-specific differences in the DNA intermediates of frameshift mutagenesis. In vitro synthesis errors of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and its large fragment derivative. J Mol Biol. 1989 May 20;207(2):335–353. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90258-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pribnow D., Sigurdson D. C., Gold L., Singer B. S., Napoli C., Brosius J., Dull T. J., Noller H. F. rII cistrons of bacteriophage T4. DNA sequence around the intercistronic divide and positions of genetic landmarks. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 5;149(3):337–376. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Revich G. G., Ripley L. S. Effects of proflavin and photoactivated proflavin on the template function of single-stranded DNA. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jan 5;211(1):63–74. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90011-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ripley L. S., Clark A., deBoer J. G. Spectrum of spontaneous frameshift mutations. Sequences of bacteriophage T4 rII gene frameshifts. J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 20;191(4):601–613. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90448-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ripley L. S., Dubins J. S., deBoer J. G., DeMarini D. M., Bogerd A. M., Kreuzer K. N. Hotspot sites for acridine-induced frameshift mutations in bacteriophage T4 correspond to sites of action of the T4 type II topoisomerase. J Mol Biol. 1988 Apr 20;200(4):665–680. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90479-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ripley L. S. Frameshift mutation: determinants of specificity. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:189–213. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ripley L. S., Glickman B. W., Shoemaker N. B. Mutator versus antimutator activity of a T4 DNA polymerase mutant distinguishes two different frameshifting mechanisms. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;189(1):113–117. doi: 10.1007/BF00326062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ripley L. S., Shoemaker N. B. A major role for bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase in frameshift mutagenesis. Genetics. 1983 Mar;103(3):353–366. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.3.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schaaper R. M. The mutational specificity of two Escherichia coli dnaE antimutator alleles as determined from lacI mutation spectra. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1031–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Streisinger G., Okada Y., Emrich J., Newton J., Tsugita A., Terzaghi E., Inouye M. Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. This paper is dedicated to Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky on the occasion of his 66th birthday. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:77–84. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Boer J. G., Ripley L. S. An in vitro assay for frameshift mutations: hotspots for deletions of 1 bp by Klenow-fragment polymerase share a consensus DNA sequence. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):181–191. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.2.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. de Boer J. G., Ripley L. S. Demonstration of the production of frameshift and base-substitution mutations by quasipalindromic DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(17):5528–5531. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.17.5528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES