Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Mar;136(3):747–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.747

Endpoint Bias in Large Tn10-Catalyzed Inversions in Salmonella Typhimurium

P J Krug 1, A Z Gileski 1, R J Code 1, A Torjussen 1, M B Schmid 1
PMCID: PMC1205881  PMID: 8005430

Abstract

A genetic strategy identified Salmonella typhimurium strains carrying large (>40 kb) Tn10-catalyzed inversions; the inverted segments were characterized by XbaI digestion and pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Two size classes of large inversions were found. More than half of the inversions extended 40-80 kb either clockwise or counterclockwise of the original Tn10 site. The remaining inversions extended up to 1620 kb (33% of the genome), but the distal endpoints of these inversions were not randomly scattered throughout the chromosome. Rather, each Tn10 repeatedly yielded similar (though not identical) inversions. The biased endpoint selection may reflect the limited search for target DNA sequences by the Tn10 transposase, and the spatial proximity of the donor and target regions in the folded S. typhimurium nucleoid. Using this interpretation, the data suggest that DNA sequences 40-80 kb clockwise and counterclockwise of the insertion site are in spatial proximity with the insertion, perhaps reflecting the organization of DNA into ~120-kb nucleoid domains. In addition, the data predict the spatial proximity of several distant DNA regions, including DNA sequences equidistant from the origin of DNA replication.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benson N. R., Goldman B. S. Rapid mapping in Salmonella typhimurium with Mud-P22 prophages. J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(5):1673–1681. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.5.1673-1681.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bochner B. R., Huang H. C., Schieven G. L., Ames B. N. Positive selection for loss of tetracycline resistance. J Bacteriol. 1980 Aug;143(2):926–933. doi: 10.1128/jb.143.2.926-933.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell J. L., Kleckner N. E. coli oriC and the dnaA gene promoter are sequestered from dam methyltransferase following the passage of the chromosomal replication fork. Cell. 1990 Sep 7;62(5):967–979. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90271-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell J. L., Kleckner N. The rate of Dam-mediated DNA adenine methylation in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1988 Dec 25;74(1):189–190. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casadesus J., Roth J. R. Transcriptional occlusion of transposon targets. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Apr;216(2-3):204–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00334357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeLong A., Syvanen M. Trans-acting transposase mutant from Tn5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15;88(14):6072–6076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Derbyshire K. M., Kramer M., Grindley N. D. Role of instability in the cis action of the insertion sequence IS903 transposase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(11):4048–4052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kleckner N., Reichardt K., Botstein D. Inversions and deletions of the Salmonella chromosome generated by the translocatable tetracycline resistance element Tn10. J Mol Biol. 1979 Jan 5;127(1):89–115. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90461-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kleckner N., Steele D. A., Reichardt K., Botstein D. Specificity of insertion by the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1023–1040. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.4.1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klenin K. V., Vologodskii A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Dykhne A. M., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Computer simulation of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1991 Feb 5;217(3):413–419. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90745-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu S. L., Sanderson K. E. A physical map of the Salmonella typhimurium LT2 genome made by using XbaI analysis. J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(5):1662–1672. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.5.1662-1672.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maloy S. R., Nunn W. D. Selection for loss of tetracycline resistance by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1981 Feb;145(2):1110–1111. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.2.1110-1111.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morisato D., Kleckner N. Tn10 transposition and circle formation in vitro. Cell. 1987 Oct 9;51(1):101–111. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morisato D., Way J. C., Kim H. J., Kleckner N. Tn10 transposase acts preferentially on nearby transposon ends in vivo. Cell. 1983 Mar;32(3):799–807. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90066-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Noel K. D., Ames G. F. Evidence for a common mechanism for the insertion of the Tn10 transposon and for the generation of Tn10-stimulated deletions. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Oct 30;166(2):217–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00285924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raleigh E. A., Kleckner N. Multiple IS10 rearrangements in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1984 Mar 15;173(4):437–461. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90390-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rebollo J. E., François V., Louarn J. M. Detection and possible role of two large nondivisible zones on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9391–9395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roberts D., Hoopes B. C., McClure W. R., Kleckner N. IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):117–130. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ross D. G., Swan J., Kleckner N. Physical structures of Tn10-promoted deletions and inversions: role of 1400 bp inverted repetitions. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):721–731. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90088-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rybenkov V. V., Cozzarelli N. R., Vologodskii A. V. Probability of DNA knotting and the effective diameter of the DNA double helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5307–5311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sanderson K. E., Roth J. R. Linkage map of Salmonella typhimurium, edition VII. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Dec;52(4):485–532. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.4.485-532.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schmid M. B., Roth J. R. Selection and endpoint distribution of bacterial inversion mutations. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):539–557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Segall A. M., Roth J. R. Recombination between homologies in direct and inverse orientation in the chromosome of Salmonella: intervals which are nonpermissive for inversion formation. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):737–747. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sinden R. R., Pettijohn D. E. Chromosomes in living Escherichia coli cells are segregated into domains of supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):224–228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. VOGEL H. J., BONNER D. M. Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1956 Jan;218(1):97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wong K. K., McClelland M. A BlnI restriction map of the Salmonella typhimurium LT2 genome. J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(5):1656–1661. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.5.1656-1661.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Worcel A., Burgi E. On the structure of the folded chromosome of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1972 Nov 14;71(2):127–147. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES