Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Mar;136(3):903–912. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.903

Low, but Strongly Structured Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in Root Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne)

A Hugall 1, C Moritz 1, J Stanton 1, D R Wolstenholme 1
PMCID: PMC1205895  PMID: 7911772

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (genus Meloidogyne) have been the subject of recent and numerous studies of genetic variation because of the need to develop molecular diagnostics for the four globally distributed, parthenogenetic species that are significant agricultural pests. Our analysis of Meloidogyne mtDNA improves on previous studies: (i) by examining restriction site polymorphism among a large number of isolates also characterized for standard morphological, host range and allozyme phenotypes; (ii) by using higher resolution electrophoretic techniques; and (iii) by mapping variable restriction sites with reference to the complete nucleotide sequence. This revealed fivefold less sequence divergence (<0.6%) between variants than estimated in previous restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) studies, but perfect correspondence between mtDNA haplotype and allozyme (esterase) phenotypes. The mtDNA variation, although limited, is strongly structured with as much divergence between two lineages of Meloidogyne arenaria as between either of these and Meloidogyne javanica. The low diversity of mtDNAs suggests that these parthenogenetic lineages arose from distinct but closely related sexual females, a pattern seen in other parthenogenetic complexes. In contrast to the concordance between mtDNA and allozyme markers, there were several discrepancies between the traditional methods of identification. We suggest that further studies of these nematodes should focus on well defined genetic groups, whether or not these coincide with existing taxonomic units.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cann R. L., Brown W. M., Wilson A. C. Polymorphic sites and the mechanism of evolution in human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):479–499. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeSalle R., Freedman T., Prager E. M., Wilson A. C. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1-2):157–164. doi: 10.1007/BF02111289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McElroy D., Moran P., Bermingham E., Kornfield I. REAP: an integrated environment for the manipulation and phylogenic analysis of restriction data. J Hered. 1992 Mar-Apr;83(2):157–158. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Okimoto R., Chamberlin H. M., Macfarlane J. L., Wolstenholme D. R. Repeated sequence sets in mitochondrial DNA molecules of root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne): nucleotide sequences, genome location and potential for host-race identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 11;19(7):1619–1626. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.7.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomas W. K., Wilson A. C. Mode and tempo of molecular evolution in the nematode caenorhabditis: cytochrome oxidase II and calmodulin sequences. Genetics. 1991 Jun;128(2):269–279. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Upholt W. B. Estimation of DNA sequence divergence from comparison of restriction endonuclease digests. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977;4(5):1257–1265. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.5.1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wolstenholme D. R. Animal mitochondrial DNA: structure and evolution. Int Rev Cytol. 1992;141:173–216. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62066-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES