Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2025 May 8;16:4263. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59598-1

Ideal antiferroelectricity with large digital electrostrain in PbZrO3 epitaxial thin films

Yangyang Si 1,#, Ningbo Fan 2,#, Yongqi Dong 3,#, Zhen Ye 4,5,#, Shiqing Deng 6,7, Yijie Li 1, Chao Zhou 1, Qibin Zeng 4, Lu You 2, Yimei Zhu 7, Zhenlin Luo 3, Sujit Das 8, Laurent Bellaiche 9,10, Bin Xu 2,, Huajun Liu 4,, Zuhuang Chen 1,
PMCID: PMC12059014  PMID: 40335517

Abstract

Antiferroelectrics exhibit reversible antipolar-polar phase transitions under electric fields, yielding large electrostrain suitable for electromechanical devices. Nevertheless, in thin-film form, the antiferroelectric behavior is often obscured by competing ferroic orders, resulting in slanted hysteresis loops with undesired remnant polarization, subsequently posing challenges in obtaining ideal antiferroelectricity and understanding their intrinsic electrical behavior. Here, atomistic models for controllable antiferroelectric-ferroelectric phase transition pathways are unveiled along specific crystallographic directions. Guided by the anisotropic phase transition and orientation design, we achieved ideal antiferroelectricity with square double hysteresis loop, large saturated polarization (~60 μC/cm2), near-zero remnant polarization, fast response time (~75 ns), and near-fatigue-free performance (~1010 cycles) in (111)P-oriented PbZrO3 epitaxial thin films. Moreover, a bipolar and frequency-independent digital electrostrain (~0.83%) was demonstrated in this architype antiferroelectric system. In-situ X-ray diffraction studies further reveal that the large digital electrostrain results from an intrinsic field-induced antiferroelectric-ferroelectric structural transition. This work demonstrates the anisotropic phase transition mechanism and ideal antiferroelectricity with large digital electrostrain in antiferroelectric thin films, offering a new avenue for applications of antiferroelectricity in nanoelectromechanical systems.

Subject terms: Ferroelectrics and multiferroics, Ferroelectrics and multiferroics


How to achieve ideal antiferroelectricity with sharp switching in nanoscale thin films remains challenges. The authors here unveil the selective stepwise transition, achieve ideal antiferroelectricity with large digital electrostrain in PbZrO3 epitaxial thin films.

Introduction

Materials exhibiting high electromechanical responses are of significant interest in modern nano/micro-electromechanical system13. Generally, there are two different types of electromechanical responses: analog type, where the induced displacement changes continuously with varying an applied field; and digital type, characterized by a critical electric field to turn on/off the electrostrain4 (Fig. 1a). Analog displacements and electrostrains, commonly observed in piezoelectric and electrostrictive materials, offer continuous adjustment and have been extensively utilized in applications such as energy harvesting, displacement transducers, and ultra-precision positioners5,6. The digital counterpart, in contrast, can provide discrete movement with a constant distance, i.e., bistable on/off electrostrain states, which is well suited for applications in optical-grid manufacturing and swing motion devices7. However, achieving digital displacement behaviors is challenging in conventional electromechanical coupling materials because of the requirements of near-zero electromechanical response and significant displacement switching below and above the critical electric field, respectively.

Fig. 1. Atomistic modeling of AFE-FE phase transition in PbZrO3.

Fig. 1

a Schematic comparison of electrostrain versus electric field among normal piezoelectric, electrostrictive, and AFE-FE phase transition. b Schematic view of volume expansion during AFE-FE phase transition. c Structure of the AFE ground state and field-induced FE phase from DFT calculations, the atoms in grey, green, and red denote the Pb2+, Zr4+, and O2-, respectively. d Anisotropic enthalpy and e volume expansion during AFE-FE phase transition. f Energetic path for AFE-FE phase transition with various electric field directions. g AFE, IM* and IM** (FE111P) structures derived from NEB calculations.

Benefiting from the small energy difference between the ferroelectric (FE) and antiferroelectric (AFE) structures, AFEs are widely recognized as typical two-state systems where nonpolar and polar states as well as corresponding physical properties, can be reversibly switched via application/removal of an external electric field8,9. Consequently, it has emerged as an excellent candidate for efficient electric control of physical properties in modern electronic devices, and has been demonstrated towards various applications, e.g., thermal switching10, electrocaloric cooling11, negative capacitance12, and pulsed power capacitors13. Considering the large structural variations, the AFE-to-FE phase transition leads to substantial volume expansion under an applied electric field, resulting in large electromechanical responses (Fig. 1b)7. Since the field-induced electrostrain in the AFE or FE phase is generally negligibly small compared to the large electrostrain at the phase transition, therefore, for a sharp transition, a large digital-like electrostrain would be generated. This is distinctively different from the normal piezoelectric and electrostrictive effects. However, a comprehensive understanding of the AFE-to-FE phase transition is still lacking, and challenges to synthesize high-quality materials limit the exploration of antiferroelectricity in both fundamental science and practical applications1416.

Meanwhile, taking archetypal AFE material PbZrO3 (PZO) as an example, in its thin-film form, strain and/or surface effects would generally lead to the emergent FE order17,18. As a result, antiferroelectricity in thin films is usually obscured with large remnant polarization and a slanted hysteresis loop18. Moreover, a new ferrielectric structure has been observed recently in (100)P-oriented PZO films, indicating that there could be a transient state between the AFE and FE structures under an electric field19,20. The existence of transient polar states during the AFE-FE phase transition would disrupt the digital signal. All told, a complete understanding of the antiferroelectricity is hardly realized, and direct evidence of ideal antiferroelectricity with sharp switching is still absent in AFE thin films1821. The retention of ferroelectric component and the resulting remnant polarization strongly distorts the double hysteresis loop and hinders the digital electromechanical behavior in AFE thin films. The design and experimental proof of a sharp AFE-to-FE phase transition in thin films with large digital electrostrain remains to be explored.

In this work, we unveil the anisotropic antiferroelectric phase transition by combining first-principles calculations and experiments that demonstrate the presence of “ideal” antiferroelectricity with a sharp phase transition and a large digital electrostrain in (111)P-oriented PZO epitaxial thin films. The achieved double hysteresis loop exhibits a square shape with sharp switching, large saturated polarization (~60 μC/cm2), near-zero remanent polarization, and fatigue-free behavior after 1010 switching cycles. Benefiting from the structural phase transition with a narrow voltage range, we achieve a large digital electrostrain (~0.83%). A field-induced FE structure is further resolved by in-situ synchrotron-based X-ray diffractions, providing evidence of volume expansion with rhombohedral symmetry as long-term expected by communities. The current work makes a significant breakthrough in offering a holistic understanding of electric field-induced antiferroelectric-ferroelectric structural phase transition, realizing sharp antiferroelectric switching in epitaxial thin films, along with digital electromechanical characterization and applications.

Results

Atomistic modeling of AFE-FE phase transition

In its bulk form, PZO possesses an orthorhombically distorted perovskite structure with space group Pbam and lattice constant of ao = 5.884 Å, bo = 11.768 Å, and co = 8.220 Å at room temperature22. The orthorhombic unit cell of PZO can alternatively be described as a simplified pseudotetragonal perovskite unit cell with constants ap = ao/2 = 4.16 Å, bp = bo/22 = 4.16 Å and cp = co/2 = 4.11 Å22 (The subscript “O” denotes orthorhombic indices while the subscript “P” denotes pseudo-tetragonal indices, Supplementary Fig. 1). The centrosymmetric orthorhombic structure is associated with an a-a-c0 oxygen octahedral rotation pattern in Glazer’s notation23, together with Pb2+ cations adopting the up-up-down-down (i.e., ↑↑↓↓) antipolar dipole arrangements along [110]P. In comparison, the field-induced FE structure is generally predicted to be the rhombohedral R3c structure with polarization direction along [111]P24, despite the fact that its exact lattice structure has not been experimentally validated yet. Figure 1c shows the AFE structure (Supplementary Data 1) alongside the FE structure of PZO (Supplementary Data 2, 3), both being relaxed from DFT calculations in Supplementary Table 1. Compared with the Pbam AFE structure, wherein the antipolar dipoles are aligned along [110]P, the dipoles in the FE structure switch to the [111]P direction, and additional antiphase rotation occurs along the [001]P axis, which give rise to a-a-a- octahedral rotation. Therefore, both dipole reorientation and antiphase octahedral rotation play important roles in the AFE-to-FE phase transitions, and strong anisotropy is expected when the antipolar dipoles are subjected to external electric fields with different directions. Considering the orientation geometry, DFT calculations are performed under applied electric fields of four different directions, i.e., [100]P, [110]P, [11¯0]P and [111]P directions. The enthalpy (defined as H=EDFTPE, where EDFT is the DFT energy, P is the ferroelectric polarization, and E is the applied electric field) gradually decreases with increasing electric field before the AFE-to-FE phase transition in Fig. 1d. Sharp enthalpy change occurs at the critical field where the AFE structure transforms into the FE structure. The enthalpy of the FE structure is lower than that of the AFE under high-field conditions, which can be understood as the driving force of the AFE-to-FE phase transition.

The variation in polarization and volume of the AFE structure under an electric field are further calculated (Supplementary Fig. 2). Consequently, PZO under a [111]P-oriented electric field exhibits the largest polarization change, along with the smallest critical transition field, highlighting the advantages of orientation control in manipulating antiferroelectricity. Meanwhile, the final FE structure obtained under applied electric fields of different directions show different symmetries (Supplementary Fig. 3). Only the PZO under the [111]P field exhibits the rhombohedral structure with R3c symmetry which has the largest volume expansion, while the other three are monoclinic structures with Cc symmetry and smaller volume expansion than that of the [111]P case shown in Fig. 1e. This difference can be attributed to the non-parallel alignment between the field direction and polarization vector in the field-driven FE phase, which can distort the polarization orientation and destroy the three-fold rotation symmetric around the [111]P axis in the R3c phase, leading to the formation of the lower-symmetry Cc phase for fields along the [100]P, [110]P, and [11¯0]P directions.

We further performed nudged elastic band (NEB) calculation to identify the structural evolution and possible transient states during the AFE-FE phase transition with different field directions (Supplementary Movies 14). The energetic pathways of PZO related to the reaction coordinate is presented in Fig. 1f. Two local minima appear when the electric field is applied along the [11¯0]P and [100]P directions, indicating the existence of two additional metastable transient states IM* and IM** in Fig. 1g. In contrast, no local minimum appears when the applied field is along the [111]P and [110]P directions. From the perspective of atomic structure, antiphase rotation and antipolar dipole switching occur simultaneously in PZO under the application of electric field along the [111]P direction (Supplementary Fig. 4). However, in the atomic structure of PZO under field along the [11¯0]P and [100]P directions, the antipolar dipoles can partially switch first from ↑↑↓↓ in AFE to a transient ferrielectric state (IM*) with ↑↑↓↑ polar arrangement in the (001) plane, accompanying with the presence of polarization component and antiphase octahedral rotation along the [001]P direction (Supplementary Fig. 5). Subsequently, they fully switched to another transient state (IM**) with ↑↑↑↑ polar arrangement, which is close to the [111]P direction. The final FE structure can be further achieved from the polar transient state IM** through octahedral rotation-assisted polar dipole reorientation to the [11¯1]P direction. The complex structural evolution with multiple switching differs significantly from the one-step AFE-to-FE phase transition in PZO under application of fields along the [111]P direction, and can result in a deviation from the expected one-step AFE-to-FE behavior. All told, our DFT results demonstrate that a sharp transition can be derived from PZO with an appropriate applied field direction (i.e., [111]P direction), resulting in the sharpest switching event, largest saturated polarization, and volume expansion.

Antiferroelectric structure of (111)P -oriented PbZrO3 thin films

To examine the theoretical predication, antiferroelectric PZO thin films with a thickness of ~150 nm is epitaxially grown on SrRuO3 (SRO)-buffered (111)P-oriented SrTiO3 (STO) single crystal substrates via pulsed laser deposition. X-ray diffraction analysis is performed to analyze the crystal structure in PZO films, revealing the high-quality epitaxy of the film without any secondary phases in the θ/2θ scan in Fig. 2a. Apart from the main Bragg diffraction peaks from PZO, SRO, and STO, a superlattice peak corresponding to the (3/2, 3/2, 3/2)P reflection of PZO also appears. This half-index peak is forbidden in antiphase octahedral rotation but emerges with the accompaniment of antipolar dipole arrangement25. For (111)P-oriented PZO-based AFE films, our previous studies revealed that the AFE axis points along the [110]P direction and thus inclines by 35.26° from the out-of-plane [111]P direction26. Therefore, in-plane antipolar modulation would orient along [11¯0]P and subsequently result in 60° domains (inset of Fig. 2a). Therefore, X-ray RSMs are further conducted to study the domain structure in Fig. 2b. Clear 3-fold splitting of the PZO 111P Bragg peak was observed in the HK mapping, confirming the existence of 60° structural domains. The triple splitting can be attributed to the pseudo-tetragonal structure of PZO as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 7. In addition, the presence of 60° domains further leads to the hexagonal satellite 1/4 superstructure diffraction peaks originated from the antipolar dipole modulation (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Fig. 2. Antiferroelectric structure characterization in (111)P-oriented PbZrO3 thin films.

Fig. 2

a θ/2θ line scan of 150 nm PbZrO3/20 nm SrRuO3/SrTiO3 (111) heterostructure. Figure inset denotes the possible antiferroelectric vector orientations. b Synchrotron-based in-plane reciprocal space mapping around (111)P-diffraction condition of PbZrO3 with Qx//[11¯0]P and Qy//[112¯]P. The main Bragg spots of PbZrO3 (111)P exhibit triple splitting, accompanied by hexagonal satellite spots. c Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of PbZrO3 layer. d local AFE structure fitted by the conventional atomistic model of Pbam PbZrO3, the atoms in grey, green, and red denote the Pb2+, Zr4+, and O2-, respectively. e Fast Fourier transform of PbZrO3 layer in (c). f Selected Pb2+ position mapping from the dotted square in c reveals the antipolar period in PbZrO3 layer.

High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging is employed at the [112¯]P zone axis to directly observe antipolar dipole arrangement in real space. The cross-sectional image of PZO displays high crystalline quality without any visible defect in Fig. 2c. The atomic model fits well with the distribution of atoms from the HAADF-STEM results in Fig. 2d, where Zr4+ are neatly aligned while Pb2+ display antiparallel displacement relative to the centrosymmetric Zr4+ positions. The corresponding fast Fourier transform reveals the presence of 1/4 superstructure spots along [11¯0]P, which agrees well with the in-plane ↑↑↓↓ antipolar dipole arrangement in Fig. 2e. Albeit with some disturbance originating from the partially overlapping between Pb2+ and Zr4+, the antipolar dipoles and their arrangement can be effectively observed across [112¯]P zone axis (Supplementary Fig. 9), and the antipolar nature with ↑↑↓↓ of Pb2+ displacement is clearly visible. All told, the atomic-scale real-space imaging studies clearly reveal the antiferroelectric structure in the (111)P-oriented PZO thin films, being consistent with aforementioned X-ray diffraction results.

Antiferroelectric switching under an electric field

For ideal antiferroelectricity, the AFE-FE phase transition under electric field should be first order in a narrow electric field range, that is, a sharp phase transition with large saturated polarization and zero remanent polarization is preferred. In the (111)P-oriented PZO thin films, a square double hysteresis loop with large saturated polarization (Ps~60 μC/cm2) and four sharp switching current peaks is obtained in Fig. 3a. The double hysteresis loop shows nearly zero remanent polarization and a steep slope at the critical electric field, which is almost perpendicular to the electric field axis. In comparison, a slanted quintuple hysteresis loop with lower saturation polarization (Ps~40 μC/cm2) and larger remanent polarization (Pr~2.9 μC/cm2) are observed in the (100)P -oriented PZO thin films (inset of Fig. 3a). Meanwhile, the switching current exhibit ten switching peaks, indicating gradual multistep phase transitions between the AFE and FE structure, which is well consistent with aforementioned NEB results. The sharp switching in the (111)P-oriented PZO thin film not only prevents the remanent polarization resulting from the competing ferroelectric order but also achieves the highest saturation polarization up to ~60 μC/cm2, in good agreement with first-principal calculations.

Fig. 3. Electrical characterization of AFE-FE phase transition.

Fig. 3

a Double hysteresis loop and switching current of (111)P-oriented PbZrO3 films, figure inset provide the slanted double hysteresis loop and corresponding multistep switching current peak in (100)P-oriented PbZrO3 films. Fatigue performance (b) and switching time (c) for AFE-FE phase transition in (111)P-oriented PbZrO3 films. d Comparison of superior factors and remanent polarization of our films with representative reported perovskite AFE thin films, including PbZrO3 thin films3,21,2836, PbHfO3 thin films37,38, PbSnO3 thin films39, (Bi,Re)FeO3 thin films40, AgNbO3 thin films41,42, and NaNbO3 thin films43,44.

Fatigue measurement in the (111)P-oriented PZO film shows that the saturated polarization remains the same even after 1010 switching cycles in Fig. 3b. The observed fatigue-free behavior further implies high film quality with low defect concentration, as the presence of defects would pin dipole switching, consequently severely reduce the polarization value. The superior film quality can be further supported by the ultralow leakage current density (Supplementary Fig. 10). Apart from the appealing fatigue performance, the phase transition kinetics is further evaluated from pulse measurement in Fig. 3c. During a rapid increase in electric field, the polarization can quickly reach to the maximum within 75 ns. The results with different electrode sizes shows a monotonically scaling behavior between the transition speed and electrode area. Therefore, by decreasing the electrode area, the transition time would be further minimized to the sub-ns range, being comparable to typical ferroelectrics27. To well evaluate the superior antiferroelectricity, an antiferroelectric superior factor η = (Pmax-Pr)/Pr can be defined by combining Pmax and Pr, where the higher Pmax and lower Pr would result in a higher η. Overall, the (111)P-oriented PZO thin films display nearly zero remanent polarization and the largest superior factor, demonstrating “ideal” antiferroelectricity as compared with other AFE thin films shown in Fig. 3d3,21,2844.

Based on the sharp transition process, digital displacement and electrostrain are expected in the (111)P-oriented PZO films for electromechanical application. To characterize the macroscopic electromechanical strain under an electric field, a laser scanning vibrometer (LSV) is used45. The displacement is relatively small (<100 pm) below the transition field when the structure remains AFE in Fig. 4a. However, as the electric field increases, a uniform displacement jump as large as ~1100 pm is observed above the transition point (6 V). The displacement profiles under different bias voltages are presented in Fig. 4b. Within a small voltage range, the displacement profiles show an abrupt change and saturate quickly after the transition point, which can be seen as digital electromechanical switching with a threshold field (Supplementary Movies 5, 6). This type of digital electromechanical switching is further reflected in the electrostrain versus electric field in Fig. 4c, which shows a steep slope at a narrow voltage gap and achieves large electrostrain up to ~0.83%. Moreover, due to the intrinsic field-induced AFE-FE transition, this digital electromechanical behavior shows bipolar feature in Fig. 4d and frequency independence from 500 Hz to 10,000 Hz in Fig. 4e. This frequency-independence behavior arises from the first-order, field-driven structural phase transition. When the external electric field reaches the critical transition point, the phase transition occurs on a nanosecond timescale (Fig. 3c). Therefore, the digital electromechanical behavior exhibits broad frequency independence, provided that the measurement frequency does not exceed the switching dynamics limit.

Fig. 4. Electromechanical response during AFE-FE phase transition.

Fig. 4

a 3D drawing of surface displacements under applied electric field for AFE (upper panel) and FE (lower panel). b Surface displacement profiles near the critical electrical field that induces the AFE-FE phase transition. c The electrostrain evolution with increasing electric fields, the figures inset represent the antipolar dipole geometry (left panel) and polar dipole geometry (right panel). d Digital displacements under positive and negative bias. e Frequency dependence of displacements during the AFE-FE phase transition.

In-situ structural analysis of antiferroelectric and field-induced ferroelectric phase

As the digital electrostrain response relies on the field-induced lattice change, it is essential to have a detailed comparison between the AFE and FE phases from perspective of structural landscape. To obtain the evidence of structural symmetry change and accurate structural parameters, in-situ synchrotron-based 3D-reciprocal space mapping (RSM) is performed around PZO (222)P diffraction condition from both AFE and field-induced FE phases (Fig. 5a, b). Under zero field, the AFE structure displays a triple-split of the 222P-diffraction spot due to its pseudo-tetragonal nature. Under an electric field higher than the critical point, a field-induced FE phase in PZO appears i.e., the FE structure displays one symmetric 222P-spot without splitting in Fig. 5b. It’s noteworthy that the Qz of the 222P-spot from the FE structure is lower than that from AFE, which indicates the out-of-plane expansion during the AFE-to-FE phase transition. By computing the (222)P lattice spacing with Qz, an out-of-plane lattice expansion can be obtained as ~0.77%, which is close to the electrostrain of ~0.83% measured by LSV, indicating the field-driven AFE-to-FE structural phase transition is the major contributor to the observed large digital displacement.

Fig. 5. In-situ structure analysis of ground state AFE and field induced FE PbZrO3.

Fig. 5

a Synchrotron-based 3D RSM around SrTiO3 (222) for AFE PbZrO3. Qx//[112¯], Qy//[11¯0], and Qz//[111]. b The 3D RSM of FE PZO 222 main spot. c Wide range in-plane RSM of AFE PbZrO3 at Qz = 5.24 Å−1. d Schematical view of diffraction pattern from different AFE domains. e Wide range in-plane RSM of FE PbZrO3 at Qz = 5.20 Å−1. f Schematical view of diffraction pattern from FE single domain.

To further reveal the structure and symmetry differences between the AFE and FE phases, RSM studies, including the symmetric (222)P and other surrounding asymmetric main spots, are carried out. The splitting of main spots is clearly observed in the as-grown film (Supplementary Movie 7), implying the existence of multidomain structures originating from the pseudo-tetragonal AFE structure. The three sets of main spots constitute the diffraction patterns in Fig. 5c and are differentiated by colors in Fig. 5d. The disappearance of main spots splitting under the applied field indicates the presence of field-induced highly symmetric single-domain FE structure in Fig. 5e and f. By reconstructing the lattice in real space from RSM, a rhombohedral structure can be concluded within the experimental accuracy in Supplementary Table 2, which supports the long-standing predicted ferroelectric structure with rhombohedral symmetry in PZO.

Discussion

In previous studies, the coexistence of heterophases at ground state and the presence of intermediate ferrielectric structure during AFE-to-FE phase transitions in (100)P-oriented PZO thin films have been reported. These observations have led to ambiguous understandings on the antiferroelectricity and sparked ongoing debates about the intrinsic structure in PZO21,46. In this study, by controlling the orientation of high-quality epitaxial PZO films, we were able to achieve sharp antiferroelectric switching in (111)P-oriented films without any metastable ferrielectric/ferroelectric structure. The field-induced rhombohedral ferroelectric structure is observed for the first time by in-situ reciprocal space mapping and further supported by the DFT calculations. Meanwhile, NEB calculations suggest that the antipolar dipole switching is strongly anisotropic and correlated with the antiphase rotation along c axis, which alters the octahedral rotation from a-a-c0 to a-a-a- in Glazer’s notation and assists the AFE-to-FE phase transition. These results provide a systematic analysis of the electrical and structural details in (111)P-oriented PZO films, reveal the anisotropy effect on AFE thin films, and emphasize the importance of electric field direction in determining the AFE behaviors.

In summary, we have demonstrated ideal antiferroelectricity with a sharp phase transition in (111)P-oriented PZO films. The observed large digital electrostrain, fast response time, and excellent fatigue performance pave the way towards digital control and electromechanical applications. The sharp antiferroelectric switching can be attributed to the anisotropic response of the AFE structure under applied electric field, where the antipolar dipole switching and antiphase octahedral rotation can concurrently develop in (111)P-oriented PZO films. Our studies not only provide invaluable insight into the intrinsic behavior of PZO films, but also pave the way for the design of high-strain digital actuator applications using antiferroelectric thin films.

Methods

Sample preparation

High quality PbZrO3/SrRuO3 (PZO/SRO) heterostructures were synthesized on commercial (111)P-oriented SrTiO3 (STO) single crystal substrates via pulsed laser deposition (PLD) (Arrayed Materials RP-B). The growth of SRO was accomplished at 680 °C with a dynamic oxygen pressure of 100 mTorr. The corresponding laser condition is 1.0 J/cm2 and 5 Hz for laser fluence and frequency, respectively. The growth of PZO was carried out at a lower temperature of 590 °C with a dynamic oxygen pressure of 80 mTorr. The corresponding laser condition is 1.6 J/cm2 and 5 Hz for laser fluence and frequency, respectively. After deposition, the samples were cooled down to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C min−1 in an oxygen pressure of 700 Torr. After the growth, a standard lithography process is used to pattern circular photoresist pads on the heterostructure. After photolithography, the circular top Pt electrodes with areas ranging from 200 to 3200 μm2 was deposited by magnetron sputtering (Arrayed Materials RS-M). The photoresist was then lifted off in acetone.

X-ray diffraction characterization

X-ray θ-2θ scans were obtained by high-resolution X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Smartlab 9 KW). The in-situ 3D-RSM experiments under electric field were performed at Beamline BL02U2 at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, λ = 0.0680 nm), China. Pt electrodes with thickness of 100 nm and diameter of 500 μm were sputtered on the surfaces for in-situ XRD. The DC electric field was applied between bottom electrode SrRuO3 and top electrode Pt using a high-voltage power supply. A series of diffraction patterns were collected by EigerX 500k pixel area detector with rotating the sample around θ axis with ∆θ = 0.02 steps from around 14.78° to 20.78°. The exposure time was 1 s per frame. The 3D reciprocal space maps were reconstructed with self-developed Python scripts.

Aberration-corrected STEM characterization

The scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) sample was prepared using focused ion beam milling. STEM investigations were conducted by using an aberration-corrected FEI Titan Themis G2 microscope operated at 300 kV, which was equipped with double aberration correctors and an X-FEG gun. The convergent semi-angle and collection angle were 25 mrad and 48 to 200 mrad for HAADF-STEM imaging, respectively. Quantitative treatments of HAADF-STEM images were performed by using a MATLAB program made in-house. The coordinate system was set as horizontal direction and vertical direction were X-axis and Y-axis, respectively, with the left top corner pixel being the coordinate origin.

Electrical properties measurements

The electrical measurements were performed with a TF3000 analyzer (aixACCT) on a Semishare high-precision probe station (Semishare E4). The P-E loop was characterized under a 1 kHz AC electric field. The fatigue performance was tested under a 1 kHz AC electric field after several electric cycles under a 100 kHz AC electric field at the same electrode. The cycle electric field was set to be 400 kV/cm, which is slightly higher than the critical electric field for antiferroelectric-ferroelectric phase transition under a 100 kHz AC electric field. After 1010 cycles of electric field training, the double hysteresis loop shows negligible degradation. The pulse test was conducted with Keithley 4200A-SCS Parameter Analyzer. A series of rectangular waves with an electric field reaches up to 400 kV/cm was applied to induce AFE-to-FE phase transition. The corresponding risetime and pulse width for pulse measurement were set to be 20 ns and 5 us, respectively, to distinguish nanosecond-scale polarization switching dynamics.

Electromechanical response measurements

Considering the potential impact of substrate bending during strain measurement, we use a laser scan vibrometer to measure both the electrode and the surrounding area without electrode, accounting for substrate bending effects. By subtracting the displacement of the substrate (δsub) from the displacement of the film under electrode (δfilm), the effective displacement of the film can be determined by Δδ = δfilm - δsub, thereby eliminating the contribution from substrate bending. This method effectively eliminates the influence of substrate bending45,47. The electromechanical properties are measured by a laser scanning vibrometer (Polytec) system. Circular gold/palladium (with thicknesses of 50 nm and 30 nm) top electrodes of 200 µm in diameter were deposited on the PZO films by e-beam evaporator system, forming an Au/Pd-PZO-SRO sandwich device. A complex bias voltage was applied on the device through tungsten probes. The defined grid scanning area covered both the top electrode and the surrounding areas without the electrode. The effective piezoelectric coefficient is given by the slope in the field versus strain curve.

DFT calculations

First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)48,49. The projector augmented wave (PAW) method was used for describing electron-ion interactions50, and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) parametrized by Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof for solids (PBEsol) was used for the exchange-correlation functionals51. The orbitals of 5d106s26p2, 4s24p64d25s2, and 2s22p4 were explicitly treated as valence electrons for Pb, Zr, and O, respectively. A cutoff energy of 500 eV for the plane-wave basis set and Γ-centered 8 × 4 × 6 k-point mesh were used for the AFE (Pbam symmetry)46. We relaxed all atoms until the Hellmann-Feynman forces were less than 0.001 eV/Å. The convergence threshold of the self-consistent field iteration was set to 10−7 eV. The electrical polarizations were calculated based on the DFT calculated Born effective charges and atomic displacements with respect to the high-symmetry phase. And the structural response to the applied electric field was determined by considering the additional electrostatic force due to the Born charges, according to the scheme of ref. 52. Note that the Born charges were allowed to vary for different field strengths. Under the field, the equilibrium structural stability is determined by the electric enthalpy functional given by: H=EDFTPE, where EDFT is the DFT energy, P is the ferroelectric polarization, and E is the applied electric field. The energetic pathway and the associated barrier were computed by the climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method53. Linearly interpolation between AFE and FE structures is adopted as the initial path, which is then optimized by CI-NEB until the Hellmann-Feynman forces are less than 0.02 eV/Å.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

41467_2025_59598_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (95KB, pdf)

Description Of Additional Supplementary File

Supplementary Data 1 (12.8KB, txt)
Supplementary Data 2 (5.6KB, txt)
Supplementary Data 3 (4.8KB, txt)
Supplementary Movie 1. (123.8KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 2 (119.9KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 3 (140KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 4 (143.2KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 5 (2.4MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 6 (2.5MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 7 (753.7KB, mp4)
Reporting Summary (1.1MB, pdf)

Source data

Source Data (22.4MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52372105 and 92477129) and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No.. KQTD20200820113045083). Z.H.C. has been supported by the State Key Laboratory of Precision Welding & Joining of Materials and Structures (Grant No. 24-Z-13) and “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (Grant No. 2024FRFK03012). Y.Q.D. and Z.L.L. were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12175235, 12004407) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1603902). N.B.F. and B.X. acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12311530693), and the support from Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. H.J.L. acknowledges the support from National Research Foundation Competitive Research Program (NRF-CRP28-2022-0002), RIE2025 MTC Individual Research Grant (M22K2c0084), Career Development Fund (C210812020), and Central Research Fund, A*STAR, Singapore. L.B. thanks the Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship (VBFF) Grant No. N00014-20-1-2834 from the Department of Defense. The authors acknowledge the support from the BL02U2 of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).

Author contributions

Z.H.C. and Y.Y.S. conceived of and designed the research. Z.H.C. supervises the research. Y.Y.S. grows the films, measured X-ray diffraction, and electric performance. Y.Q.D, Z.L.L., Y.Y.S., and Y.J.L. carried out the In-situ 3D RSM measurement. N.B.F., L.B., and B.X. performed first-principles calculations. Z.Y., Q.B.Z., and H.J.L. performed laser scanning vibrometer measurements. S.Q.D. and Y.M.Z. carried out STEM studies. Y.Y.S., N.B.F., Y.Q.D., Z.Y., C.Z., L.Y., S.D., B.X., H.J.L., and Z.H.C. analyzed the data. Y.Y.S., B.X., H.J.L., and Z.H.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Jieyu Chen, Heng-Jui Liu, and Flávia Estrada for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The source data in this study are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code used to calculate the results shown in this work is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yangyang Si, Ningbo Fan, Yongqi Dong, Zhen Ye.

Change history

7/10/2025

In the acknowledgments section of this paper the following sentence has been removed 'the DOE Grant DE-SC0025479'. The original article has been corrected.

Contributor Information

Bin Xu, Email: binxu19@suda.edu.cn.

Huajun Liu, Email: liu_huajun@imre.a-star.edu.sg.

Zuhuang Chen, Email: zuhuang@hit.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-59598-1.

References

  • 1.Yasuda, H. et al. Mechanical computing. Nature598, 39–48 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Masmanidis, S. C. et al. Multifunctional Nanomechanical Systems via Tunably Coupled Piezoelectric Actuation. Science317, 780–783 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pan, H. et al. Clamping enables enhanced electromechanical responses in antiferroelectric thin films. Nat. Mater.23, 944–950 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uchino, K. Antiferroelectric shape memory ceramics. Actuators5, 11 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang, S. et al. Advantages and challenges of relaxor-PbTiO3 ferroelectric crystals for electroacoustic transducers-A review. Prog. Mater. Sci.68, 1–66 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang, M.-M. et al. Auxetic piezoelectric effect in heterostructures. Nat. Mater.23, 95–100 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Uchino, K. Digital displacement transducer using antiferroelectrics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.24, 460 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Randall, C. A. et al. Antiferroelectrics: History, fundamentals, crystal chemistry, crystal structures, size effects, and applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.104, 3775 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Si, Y. et al. Antiferroelectric oxide thin-films: Fundamentals, properties, and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci.142, 101231 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu, C. et al. Low voltage-driven high-performance thermal switching in antiferroelectric PbZrO3 thin films. Science382, 1265–1269 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu, C. et al. Phonon entropy engineering for caloric cooling. Appl. Phys. Rev.10, 031411 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoffmann, M. et al. Antiferroelectric negative capacitance from a structural phase transition in zirconia. Nat. Commun.13, 1228 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Acharya, M. et al. Exploring the Pb1-xSrxHfO3 system and potential for high capacitive energy storage density and efficiency. Adv. Mater.34, 2105967 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roleder, K. & Dee, J. The defect-induced ferroelectric phase in thin PbZrO3 single crystals. J. Phys. -Condens. Matter1, 1503 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tagantsev, A. K. et al. The origin of antiferroelectricity in PbZrO3. Nat. Commun.4, 2229 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lisenkov, S. et al. Prediction of high-strain polar phases in antiferroelectric PbZrO3 from a multiscale approach. Phys. Rev. B102, 104101 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mani, B. K. et al. Critical thickness for antiferroelectricity in PbZrO3. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 097601 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roy Chaudhuri, A. et al. Epitaxial strain stabilization of a ferroelectric phase in PbZrO3 thin films. Phys. Rev. B84, 054112 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burkovsky, R. G. et al. Field-induced heterophase state in PbZrO3 thin films. Phys. Rev. B105, 125409 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang, R.-J. et al. Atomic insight into the successive antiferroelectric-ferroelectric phase transition in antiferroelectric oxides. Nano Lett.23, 1522–1529 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yao, Y. et al. Ferrielectricity in the archetypal antiferroelectric, PbZrO3. Adv. Mater.35, 2206541 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jona, F. et al. X-Ray and neutron diffraction study of antiferroelectric lead Zirconate, PbZrO3. Phys. Rev.105, 849–856 (1957). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Glazer, A., Roleder, K. & Dec, J. Structure and disorder in single-crystal lead zirconate, PbZrO3. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci.49, 846–852 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Amisi, S. Ab initio investigation in PbZrO3 antiferroelectric: structural and vibrational properties. Eur. Phys. J.136, 653 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ricote, J. et al. A TEM and neutron diffraction study of the local structure in the rhombohedral phase of lead zirconate titanate. J. Phys. -Condens. Matter10, 1716 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang T. et al. Superior energy storage performance in antiferroelectric epitaxial thin films via structural heterogeneity and orientation control. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2311160 (2023).
  • 27.Parsonnet, E. et al. Toward intrinsic ferroelectric switching in multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 067601 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nguyen, M. D. Effect of substrate and electrode on the crystalline structure and energy storage performance of antiferroelectric PbZrO3 films. Thin Solid Films717, 138441 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nguyen, M. D. & Rijnders, G. Comparative study of piezoelectric response and energy-storage performance in normal ferroelectric, antiferroelectric and relaxor-ferroelectric thin films. Thin Solid Films697, 137843 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nguyen, M. D. & Rijnders, G. Electric field-induced phase transition and energy storage performance of highly-textured PbZrO3 antiferroelectric films with a deposition temperature dependence. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.38, 4953–4961 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Milesi-Brault, C. et al. Critical field anisotropy in the antiferroelectric switching of PbZrO3 films. Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 042901 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boldyreva, K. et al. Microstructure and electrical properties of (120)O-oriented and of (001)O-oriented epitaxial antiferroelectric PbZrO3 thin films on (100) SrTiO3 substrates covered with different oxide bottom electrodes. J. Appl. Phys.102, 044111 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu, H. et al. Probing antiferroelectric-ferroelectric phase transitions in PbZrO3 capacitors by piezoresponse force microscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater.30, 2003622 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qiao, L. et al. Observation of negative capacitance in antiferroelectric PbZrO3 Films. Nat. Commun.12, 4215 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Aryana, K. et al. Observation of solid-state bidirectional thermal conductivity switching in antiferroelectric lead zirconate (PbZrO3). Nat. Commun.13, 1573 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang, B. et al. Enhanced energy storage in antiferroelectrics via antipolar frustration. Nature637, 1104–1110 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsai, M. F. et al. Antiferroelectric anisotropy of epitaxial PbHfO3 films for flexible energy storage. Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2105060 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hanrahan, B. et al. The other model antiferroelectric: PbHfO3 thin films from ALD precursors. APL Mater.9, 021108 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lai, Y. H. et al. Antiferroelectric PbSnO3 Epitaxial thin films. Adv. Sci.9, e2203863 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mundy, J. A. et al. Liberating a hidden antiferroelectric phase with interfacial electrostatic engineering. Sci. Adv.8, eabg5860 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sakurai, H., Yamazoe, S. & Wada, T. Ferroelectric and antiferroelectric properties of AgNbO3 films fabricated on (001), (110), and (111)SrTiO3 substrates by pulsed laser deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett.97, 042901 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou, Y. et al. Surface plasma treatment boosting antiferroelectricity and energy storage performance of AgNbO3 film. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.44, 2923–2933 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Beppu, K. et al. Energy storage properties of antiferroelectric 0.92NaNbO3-0.08SrZrO3 film on (001)SrTiO3 substrate. Phys. Lett. A384, 126690 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lin, B. et al. Ultrahigh electromechanical response from competing ferroic orders. Nature633, 798–803 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu, H. et al. Giant piezoelectricity in oxide thin films with nanopillar structure. Science369, 292–297 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aramberri, H. et al. On the possibility that PbZrO3 not be antiferroelectric. npj Comput. Mater.7, 1–10 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yao, K. & Tay, F. E. H. Measurement of longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient of thin films by a laser-scanning vibrometer. IEEE T-UFFC50, 113–116 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B54, 11169–11186 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15–50 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fu, H. & Bellaiche, L. First-principles determination of electromechanical responses of solids under finite electric fields. Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 057601 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A. climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys.113, 9901–9904 (2000). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41467_2025_59598_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (95KB, pdf)

Description Of Additional Supplementary File

Supplementary Data 1 (12.8KB, txt)
Supplementary Data 2 (5.6KB, txt)
Supplementary Data 3 (4.8KB, txt)
Supplementary Movie 1. (123.8KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 2 (119.9KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 3 (140KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 4 (143.2KB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 5 (2.4MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 6 (2.5MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 7 (753.7KB, mp4)
Reporting Summary (1.1MB, pdf)
Source Data (22.4MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The source data in this study are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

The code used to calculate the results shown in this work is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES