Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Mar;136(3):993–999. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.993

Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Australian Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster

A A Hoffmann 1, D J Clancy 1, E Merton 1
PMCID: PMC1205902  PMID: 8005448

Abstract

In Drosophila melanogaster, weak incompatibility in crosses between infected and uninfected strains is associated with a Wolbachia microorganism. Crosses between infected males and uninfected females show a reduction (15-30%) in egg hatch. Progeny tests indicated that the infection is widespread in Australian D. melanogaster populations and that populations are polymorphic for the presence of the infection. The infection status of 266 lines from 12 populations along the eastern coast of Australia was determined by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of embryos. All populations contained both infected and uninfected flies. Infection frequencies varied between populations but there was no discernible geographical pattern. Laboratory experiments indicated that the infection was not associated with a reduction in fecundity as in Drosophila simulans. Incompatibility levels could not be increased by laboratory selection on isofemale lines. Factors contributing to the persistence of the infection in D. melanogaster populations are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (800.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyle L., O'Neill S. L., Robertson H. M., Karr T. L. Interspecific and intraspecific horizontal transfer of Wolbachia in Drosophila. Science. 1993 Jun 18;260(5115):1796–1799. doi: 10.1126/science.8511587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breeuwer J. A., Stouthamer R., Barns S. M., Pelletier D. A., Weisburg W. G., Werren J. H. Phylogeny of cytoplasmic incompatibility micro-organisms in the parasitoid wasp genus Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequences. Insect Mol Biol. 1992;1(1):25–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1993.tb00074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breeuwer J. A., Werren J. H. Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature. 1990 Aug 9;346(6284):558–560. doi: 10.1038/346558a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bressac C., Rousset F. The reproductive incompatibility system in Drosophila simulans: DAPI-staining analysis of the Wolbachia symbionts in sperm cysts. J Invertebr Pathol. 1993 May;61(3):226–230. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1993.1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hoffmann A. A., Turelli M., Harshman L. G. Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):933–948. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoffmann A. A., Turelli M. Unidirectional incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: inheritance, geographic variation and fitness effects. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):435–444. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holden P. R., Jones P., Brookfield J. F. Evidence for a Wolbachia symbiont in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1993 Aug;62(1):23–29. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Neill S. L., Giordano R., Colbert A. M., Karr T. L., Robertson H. M. 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1;89(7):2699–2702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rousset F., Vautrin D., Solignac M. Molecular identification of Wolbachia, the agent of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans, and variability in relation with host mitochondrial types. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Mar 23;247(1320):163–168. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stouthamer R., Breeuwert J. A., Luck R. F., Werren J. H. Molecular identification of microorganisms associated with parthenogenesis. Nature. 1993 Jan 7;361(6407):66–68. doi: 10.1038/361066a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Turelli M., Hoffmann A. A., McKechnie S. W. Dynamics of cytoplasmic incompatibility and mtDNA variation in natural Drosophila simulans populations. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):713–723. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES