Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Apr;136(4):1421–1434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1421

RFLP Mapping of Genes Conferring Complete and Partial Resistance to Blast in a Durably Resistant Rice Cultivar

G L Wang 1, D J Mackill 1, J M Bonman 1, S R McCouch 1, M C Champoux 1, R J Nelson 1
PMCID: PMC1205921  PMID: 7912216

Abstract

Moroberekan, a japonica rice cultivar with durable resistance to blast disease in Asia, was crossed to the highly susceptible indica cultivar, CO39, and 281 F(7) recombinant inbred (RI) lines were produced by single seed descent. The population was evaluated for blast resistance in the greenhouse and the field, and was analyzed with 127 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Two dominant loci associated with qualitative resistance to five isolates of the fungus were tentatively named Pi-5(t) and Pi-7(t). They were mapped on chromosomes 4 and 11, respectively. To identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting partial resistance, RI lines were inoculated with isolate PO6-6 of Pyricularia oryzae in polycyclic tests. Ten chromosomal segments were found to be associated with effects on lesion number (P < 0.0001 and LOD > 6.0). Three of the markers associated with QTLs for partial resistance had been reported to be linked to complete blast resistance in previous studies. QTLs identified in greenhouse tests were good predictors of blast resistance at two field sites. This study illustrates the usefulness of RI lines for mapping a complex trait such as blast resistance and suggests that durable resistance in the traditional variety, Moroberekan, involves a complex of genes associated with both partial and complete resistance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burr B., Burr F. A., Thompson K. H., Albertson M. C., Stuber C. W. Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):519–526. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haldane J B, Waddington C H. Inbreeding and Linkage. Genetics. 1931 Jul;16(4):357–374. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.4.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamer J. E., Farrall L., Orbach M. J., Valent B., Chumley F. G. Host species-specific conservation of a family of repeated DNA sequences in the genome of a fungal plant pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9981–9985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Keim P., Diers B. W., Olson T. C., Shoemaker R. C. RFLP mapping in soybean: association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):735–742. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Manly K. F. A Macintosh program for storage and analysis of experimental genetic mapping data. Mamm Genome. 1993;4(6):303–313. doi: 10.1007/BF00357089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Neumann P. E. Two-locus linkage analysis using recombinant inbred strains and Bayes' theorem. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):277–284. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Paterson A. H., Damon S., Hewitt J. D., Zamir D., Rabinowitch H. D., Lincoln S. E., Lander E. S., Tanksley S. D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):181–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paterson A. H., DeVerna J. W., Lanini B., Tanksley S. D. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):735–742. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ronald P. C., Albano B., Tabien R., Abenes L., Wu K. S., McCouch S., Tanksley S. D. Genetic and physical analysis of the rice bacterial blight disease resistance locus, Xa21. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Dec;236(1):113–120. doi: 10.1007/BF00279649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Silver J. Confidence limits for estimates of gene linkage based on analysis of recombinant inbred strains. J Hered. 1985 Nov-Dec;76(6):436–440. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stuber C. W., Lincoln S. E., Wolff D. W., Helentjaris T., Lander E. S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES