Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Apr;136(4):1475–1480. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1475

Does Diploidy Increase the Rate of Adaptation?

H A Orr 1, S P Otto 1
PMCID: PMC1205926  PMID: 8013920

Abstract

Explanations of the evolution of diploidy have focused on the advantages gained from masking deleterious alleles. Recent theory has shown, however, that masking does not always provide an advantage to diploidy and would never favor diploidy in predominantly asexual organisms. We explore a neglected alternative theory which posits that, by doubling the genome size, diploids double the rate at which favorable mutations arise. Consequently, the rate of adaptation in diploids is presumed to be faster than in haploids. The rate of adaptation, however, depends not only on the rate of appearance of new favorable mutations but also on the rate at which these mutations are incorporated (which depends on the population size and on the dominance of favorable mutations). We show that, in both asexuals and sexuals, doubling the mutation rate via diploidy often does not accelerate the rate of adaptation. Indeed, under many conditions, diploidy slows adaptation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charlesworth B. Evolution. When to be diploid. Nature. 1991 May 23;351(6324):273–274. doi: 10.1038/351273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein D. B. Heterozygote advantage and the evolution of a dominant diploid phase. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1195–1198. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kondrashov A. S., Crow J. F. Haploidy or diploidy: which is better? Nature. 1991 May 23;351(6324):314–315. doi: 10.1038/351314a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MULLER H. J. THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2–9. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Otto S. P., Goldstein D. B. Recombination and the evolution of diploidy. Genetics. 1992 Jul;131(3):745–751. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.3.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paquin C., Adams J. Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):495–500. doi: 10.1038/302495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perrot V., Richerd S., Valéro M. Transition from haploidy to diploidy. Nature. 1991 May 23;351(6324):315–317. doi: 10.1038/351315a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith J. M. What use is sex? J Theor Biol. 1971 Feb;30(2):319–335. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90058-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES