Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2025 May 7;8(5):e70825. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70825

A Prospective Cross‐Sectional Cohort Study on Factors Associations With Right Heart Thrombi and Pulmonary Embolism

Wendlassida Martin Nacanabo 1,✉, Taryètba André Arthur Seghda 1, Djième Claudine Dah 1, Mureille Loya 1, Lamoudi Prisca Thiombiano 1, Wendlassida Léa Françoise Sawadogo 1, Ella Hatoula Lengani 1, Anna Tall/Thiam 2, Nobila Valentin Yameogo 2, André Koudnoaga Samadoulougou 1, Partice Zabsonre 2
PMCID: PMC12059261  PMID: 40342959

ABSTRACT

Introduction/Objective

Floating thrombus of the right heart chambers is an uncommon diagnosis and is systematically associated with pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study is to describe the management and evolution of right intracavitary thrombi (TIC) in pulmonary embolism.

Materials and Method

This was a prospective cohort that ran for 76 months from March 5, 2017 to July 31, 2023. Patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism were included. Two population groups were established according to the presence or absence of right intracavitary thrombus on Doppler echocardiography (intracavitary thrombi+ vs. intracavitary thrombi−) permitted to compare the risks factors. Thromboembolic risk factors, including the patient's background and clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic and evolutionary aspects, were reported. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for data analysis.

Results

The prevalence of emboli associated with intracavitary thrombi was 2.98%. Arterial hypotension, right ventricular dilatation, and deaths were significantly associated with right chamber thrombi with p = 0.0051 (OR: 4.14; IC 95%: 1.53–11.2); 0.0015 (OR: 4.4; IC 95%: 1.76–10.9); 0.00 (OR: 9.21; IC 95%: 3.69–23.3); 0.0313 (OR: 3.16; IC 95%: 1.10–9.02), respectively. Thrombolysis was performed in 70.58% of patients in the intracavitary thrombi+ group, compared with 11.93% in the intracavitary thrombi− group. The presence of intracavitary thrombi+ was associated with a high mortality rate of 35.29% compared with 9.82% in the intracavitary thrombi− group.

Conclusion

The discovery of a thrombus of the right heart, although rare, is not exceptional. Their management is the subject of controversy between learned societies. Thrombolysis is the only therapeutic option in this context.

Keywords: Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou, right atrium, right ventricle, survival, thrombosis

1. Introduction

Floating thrombus of the right heart chambers is an uncommon diagnosis and is systematically associated with pulmonary embolism in 99% of cases [1]. It is a very poorly described entity with a prevalence of 4% in the literature [2, 3]. Several parameters have been identified as predictors of this pathology. The factors generally associated with its occurrence are congestive heart failure, right bundle branch block, and right ventricular systolic dysfunction [4]. It is a serious disease with a mortality rate of between 28% and 44% [4]. Despite this high mortality rate, its management remains less well codified, as there are no recommendations to date [4]. Emergency thrombolysis seems to be the most recommended treatment, but the route of administration is not unanimously accepted by authors, although there are regional consensuses [5]. We conducted a prospective cross‐sectional cohort study to investigate the factors associated with right intracavitary thrombi in pulmonary embolism at the Bogodogo University Hospital.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This was a descriptive and analytical cross‐sectional study in the Cardiology Department of the Bogodogo University Hospital during the period from March 05, 2017 to July 31, 2023. Patients admitted to the cardiology department with pulmonary embolism confirmed by CT scan of the pulmonary arteries were included in our study. In cases of hemodynamic instability requiring emergency thrombolysis, the diagnosis of PE was re‐established by thoracic CT scan after the emergency had been resolved.

2.2. Study Variables

The presence of right intracavitary thrombus was the study variable of interest. Independent variables included:

  • ▪

    Sociodemographic and clinical data including risk of hospital death.

  • ▪

    Electrocardiographic parameters including the presence of S1Q3T3, negative T waves from V1 to V3, right bundle branch block, right atrial hypertrophy.

  • ▪

    The Doppler echocardiographic parameters were: dilatation of the right cavities, presence of thrombus, and systolic function of the right ventricle assessed by Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE).

  • ▪

    The CT scan parameters were: location of thrombus, uni‐ or bilateral character, and dilatation of the pulmonary artery.

  • ▪

    Evolutionary variables included mode of exit.

2.3. Ethical Considerations

Our study does not involve any risk for the participants. Participation in the study offers no financial remuneration and does not expose the patient to any additional risk other than that associated with his or her pathology. The study does not require the doctor to perform any additional act other than that which he or she undertakes for the patient concerned. The confidentiality of patients' personal information was respected during data processing. We have obtained the consent of the subjects concerned.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All the data were entered on a microcomputer and analyzed using Epi‐Info software in its French version 7.2.5.0. The patients were subdivided into two groups according to whether echocardiography revealed a right intracavitary thrombus (Thrombus IC+) or not (Thrombus IC−). χ 2 and Fisher's exact tests were used in univariate analysis to determine the categorical variables associated with the occurrence of intracavitary thrombi. For quantitative variables, a Student's mean comparison test was used after verification of normality. In the absence of variable normality, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare medians. The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was tested using graphical methods. A value of p < 0.05 defined the significance threshold for the association between the independent variables and the occurrence of pulmonary embolism. All variables with a univariate p < 0.2 were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of intracavitary thrombi.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients

Among the 618 patients hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, 20 cases of right intracavitary thrombi were recorded, representing a prevalence of 3.22%. Figure 1 shows the flow of our patients. The mean age of our series was 54 ± 16.74 years, with a sex ratio of 0.86 for women. A sedentary lifestyle and obesity were the predominant thromboembolic risk factors. Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the patients according to the presence or absence of thrombus in the right cavities.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Patient flowchart.

Table 1.

General characteristics of patients.

Variables Total effectif (n = 618) Thrombus+ (n = 20) Thrombus− (n = 598)
Sociodemographic parameters
Average age 54.46 53.11 54.56
Men 283 11 271
Women 335 09 326
Thromboembolic risk factors
Obesity 171 04 167
Sedentary lifestyle 422 14 408
History of thromboembolic disease 64 01 63
Comorbidities
Diabetes 45 00 45
Hypertension 161 05 156
Cancer 32 01 31
Chronic respiratory disease 38 03 35
Clinical signs
Shortness of breath 515 16 499
Chest pain 491 16 475
Syncope/lipothymia 80 05 75
Haemoptysis 65 04 61
Arterial hypotension 62 06 56
Evolution
Hospital death 62 05 57

3.2. Paraclinical Characteristics of Patients

The electrocardiogram showed an S1Q3T3 appearance in 05% (n = 07) of right intracavitary thrombi. The McGinn and White sign and the presence of a negative T wave from V1 to V3 were the most frequent electrical characteristics in our series. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography revealed dilatation of the right cavities and right ventricular systolic dysfunction in 07.31% (n = 12) and 04.95% (n = 10) of these patients, respectively. Of the 20 cases of thrombi identified, 14 were in the right atrium, 5 in the right ventricle, and 1 in the pulmonary artery. PE was proximal in 11 patients and bilateral in 8 patients. Table 2 summarizes the paraclinical characteristics of patients.

Table 2.

Electro–echocardiographic and scanographic characteristics of patients.

Paraclinical characteristics Total number (n = 618) TIC+ (n = 20) TIC− (n = 598)
Electrocardiographic aspects
Aspect S1Q3T3 140 07 133
Negative T waves from V1 to V3 102 02 100
Right bundle branch block 62 03 59
Right atrial hypertrophy 27 00 27
Echocardiographic findings
Dilation of the right cavities 164 12 152
Right ventricular systolic dysfunction 202 10 192
TAPSE < 17 mmHg 109 09 100
CT scan
Proximal pulmonary embolism 335 11 324
Bilatérale pulmonary embolism 346 08 338
Pulmonary artery dilatation 36 01 35

Abbreviation: TIC, intrcavitary thrombus.

3.3. Therapeutic and Evolutionary Characteristics of Patients

Heparin was used in all patients with right intracavitary thrombi. The presence of right intracavitary thrombi was statistically associated with thrombolysis. In total, 25% of patients with right intracavitary thrombi died. Table 3 gives the characteristics of the patients in univariate analysis. After multivariate logistic regression, arterial hypotension (OR = 4.14; IC = 1.53–11.2; p = 0.0051), right ventricular dilatation (OR = 4.40; IC = 1.76–10.9; p = 0.0051), thrombolysis (OR = 9.21; IC = 3.69–23.3; p = 0.00), and death (OR = 3.16; IC = 1.10–9.02; p = 0.03) were associated with the presence of intracavitary thrombi with a p < 0.05 (Table 4).

Table 3.

Bivariate analysis of general patient characteristics.

Variables TIC+ (n = 20) TIC− (n = 598) Odds ratio p
Thromboembolic factors
Sedentary lifestyle 14 (3.32%) 408 (96.68%) 1.0866 0.5416
Obesity 04 (2.34%) 167 (97.66%) 0.6452 0.3097
VTE history 1 (1.56%) 63 (98.44%) 0.4470 0.3674
Comorbidities
Hypertension 05 (3.11%) 156 (96.89%) 0.9444 0.5745
Cancer 02 (6.25%) 30 (95.75%) 2.1037 0.2774
Respiratory disease 03 (7.89%) 35 (92.11%) 2.8387 0.1183
Clinical signs
Shortness of breath 16 (3.11%) 499 (96.89%) 0.7936 0.4341
Chest pain 16 (3.26%) 475 (96.74%) 1.0358 0.6059
Syncope 05 (6.25%) 75 (93.757%) 2.3244 0.0685
Haemoptysis 4 (6.15%) 61 (93.85%) 2.2008 0.1489
Hypotension 06 (9.68%) 56 (90.32%) 4.1482 0.0100
Paraclinical signs
S1Q3T3 Aspect 7 (5.00%) 133 (95.00%) 1.8826 0.1442
T wave V1 to V3 7 (07.44%) 87 (92.55%) 0.0358 0.4034
CR dilatation 12 (7.32%) 152 (92.68%) 4.4013 0.0013
RV dysfunction 10 (4.98%) 191 (95.02%) 2.1309 0.0759
Proximal PE 11 (3.18%) 335 (96.82%) 0.9595 0.5514
Treatment
Thrombolysis 11 (13.58%) 70 (86.42%) 9.2190 0.0000
Heparin 20 (3.24%) 598 (96.76) 0.0000 0.0000
Evolution
Deceased 05 (8.06%) 57 (91.94%) 3.1637 0.0409

Abbreviations: CR, right cavity; PE, pulmonary embolism; VR, right ventricular; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of variables associated with right intracavitary thrombi.

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR p OR [IC 95%] p
Hemoptysis 2.2008 0.1489 2.2015 [0.71; 6.69] 0.1700
Chronic respiratory disease 2.8387 0.1183 0.0000 [0.00; 1.00] 0.9759
Arterial hypotension 4.1482 0.0100 4.1485 [1.53; 11.2] 0.0051
Aspect S1Q3T3 1.8826 0.1442 1.8826 [0.73; 4.81] 0.1866
Syncope 2.3244 0.0685 2.3253 [0.82; 6.58] 0.1119
Dilation of the right ventricle 4.4013 0.0013 4.4013 [1.76; 10.9] 0.0015
Thrombolysis 9.2190 0.0000 9.2191 [3.69; 23.3] 0.0000
Deaths 3.1637 0.0000 3.1638 [1.10; 9.02] 0.0313

Note: After multivariate analysis using logistic regression, arterial hypotension, right ventricular dilatation, thrombolysis, and death were significantly associated with the presence of right heart thrombi with a p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

Thrombi of the right heart can be classified into two main groups: the first group represents thombi of venous origin in transit from the right atrium or right ventricle. These are generally mobile, serpiginous thrombi [6]. Thrombi developed in situ or mural are small and immobile and make up the second group [4]. In the first group, thrombi most often originate in the veins of the lower limbs, inferior vena cava, renal veins, etc. The frequency of right heart thrombi in our series was 3.22%. Higher frequencies have been reported in the literature. The International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) study found 4% [2]. Like other series, our results show a frequent association between hemodynamic instability and the presence of right heart thrombi in PE. The association of right ventricular dysfunction and arterial hypotension with right heart thrombi has been described in many series. It was 20% in the series by Koć et al. and that of Kurnicka et al. [7, 8].

The thromboembolic risk factors reported in our series were similar to those found in other scientific reviews. In agreement with previous studies, a sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and cancer were the most important thromboembolic risk factors associated with right heart thrombi [9]. Hypertension was the most frequent comorbidity in our series, but was not significantly associated with right heart thrombi. The difference between the physical characteristics of left and right heart thrombi is that right intracavity thrombi most often do not originate from the right atrium but rather from emboli of venous origin [10]. However, although exceptional, heart failure or atrial fibrillation may be responsible for right heart thrombi [10].

In our series, no thrombus attached to the heart wall was observed. That could be due to the size, location of thrombi in the heart chambers or the experience of the sonographer. Some authors also believe that the biological characteristics of thrombi may limit their detection by transthoracic echocardiography [11].

Emergency fibrinolysis was carried out in 13.58% of patients in our series, or 55% in the case of right intracavity thrombi, with a statistically significant difference. Failure to treat leads to mortality in 100% of cases [12]. However, there is still no consensus on the management of these thrombi, as there is as yet no consensus among practitioners. As a result, it is not clearly defined in the European recommendations on the management of pulmonary embolism [13]. Elsewhere, embolectomy has given satisfactory results [4, 14]. Some authors believe that thrombolytic agents cause thrombi to migrate into the pulmonary system, with dreadful consequences [15]. For this reason, surgical embolectomy is sometimes preferred to thrombolysis. In the case of early discovery of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, the installation of a vena cava filter can prevent these thrombi from passing through the right cavities to cause PE [16].

The mortality rate was 25% among patients with right intracavitary thrombi in our series. This result is lower than that of Seghda and colleagues who found 45% mortality in 2015 [3]. Lower values have been reported in the literature. Indeed, Islam and colleagues, Ibrahim and colleagues, and Athappan and colleagues reported, respectively, 18.7%, 20.4%, and 23.2% mortality of right heart thrombi [16, 17, 18, 19]. The absence of emergency treatment other than fibrinolysis could explain this high mortality in our context.

5. Limitations of the Study

The limitations of this study are its single‐center design, the no 30‐day follow‐up, and the absence of investigations with an etiological aim. These limitations make it impossible to generalize these results, hence, the need for further multicenter studies.

6. Conclusion

The presence of a floating thrombus in the right chambers is an uncommon entity but is associated with a high mortality rate. Arterial hypotension, right ventricular dilatation, thrombolysis, and death were the factors associated with right heart thrombi in this study. Although their mortality is high, there is no consensus or recommendation on their management. Surgical embolectomy or emergency fibrinolysis appear to be the best way of improving their prognosis. An evaluation of the impact of thrombolysis on right intracavitary thrombi is crucial in our context where other means are unavailable.

Author Contributions

Wendlassida Martin Nacanabo: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, investigation, methodology. Taryètba André Arthur Seghda: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, investigation, project administration. Djième Claudine Dah: methodology, data curation. Mureille Loya: data curation. Lamoudi Prisca Thiombiano: data curation. Wendlassida Léa Françoise Sawadogo: data curation. Ella Hatoula Lengani: data curation. Anna Tall/Thiam: supervision. Nobila Valentin Yameogo: supervision. André Koudnoaga Samadoulougou: supervision. Partice Zabsonre: supervision.

Ethics Statement

Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Bogodogo University Hospital (N2024‐03‐038). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Transparency Statement

The lead author Wendlassida Martin Nacanabo affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  • 1. Brault‐Meslin O., Mazouz S., Nallet O., Cattan S., and Amara W., “Floating Thrombus in Right Cavities,” Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 64, no. 5 (2015): 410–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Goldhaber S. Z., Visani L., and De Rosa M., “Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER),” Lancet 353, no. 9162 (1999): 1386–1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Seghda T. A., Yaméogo N. V., Millogo G. R. C., et al., “Prise en charge et pronostic des embolies pulmonaires associées à des thrombi intracavitaires droits: à propos d'une série prospective au centre Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo,” Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 68, no. 2 (2019): 65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Torbicki A., Galié N., Covezzoli A., Rossi E., De Rosa M., and Goldhaber S. Z., “Right Heart Thrombi in Pulmonary Embolism,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 41, no. 12 (2003): 2245–2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sammuel Z., Goldhaber M. D., et al., “Optimal Strategy for Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism Due to Right Atrial Thrombus,” Science Direct 63, no. 12 (1988): 1261–1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mohan B., Chhabra S. T., Gulati A., et al., “Clinical and Echocardiographic Diagnosis, Follow Up and Management of Right‐Sided Cardiac Thrombi,” Indian Heart Journal 65, no. 5 (2013): 529–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Koć M., Kostrubiec M., Elikowski W., et al., “Outcome of Patients With Right Heart Thrombi: The Right Heart Thrombi European Registry,” European Respiratory Journal 47, no. 3 (2016): 869–875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kurnicka K., Lichodziejewska B., Goliszek S., et al., “Echocardiographic Pattern of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Analysis of 511 Consecutive Patients,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 29, no. 9 (2016): 907–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pollack C. V., Schreibber D., Goldhaber S. Z., et al., “Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: Initial Report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry),” Collège Américain de Cardiologie 57, no. 6 (2011): 700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Murgier M., “Thromboembolie auriculaire droite: Clinical, Echocardiography and Pathophysiologic Manifestations ‐ ScienceDirect,” (Français. These (NNT: 2021LYSES033), University of Lyon, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mikell F. L., Asinger R. W., Elsperger K. J., Anderson W. R., and Hodges M., “Tissue Acoustic Properties of Fresh Left Ventricular Thrombi and Visualization by Two Dimensional Echocardiography: Experimental Observations,” American Journal of Cardiology 49, no. 5 (1982): 1157–1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Rose P. S., Punjabi N. M., and Pearse D. B., “Treatment of Right Heart Thromboemboli,” Chest 121, no. 3 (2002): 806–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ferrari E., Benhamou M., Berthier F., and Baudouy M., “Mobile Thrombi of the Right Heart in Pulmonary Embolism,” Chest 127, no. 3 (2005): 1051–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Iaccarino A., Frati G., Schirone L., et al., “Surgical Embolectomy for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism: State of the Art,” Journal of Thoracic Disease 10, no. 8 (August 2018): 5154–5161, 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Casazza F., Bongarzoni A., Centonze F., and Morpurgo M., “Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Right‐Sided Cardiac Mobile Thrombi in Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism,” American Journal of Cardiology 79, no. 10 (1997): 1433–1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Malloy P. C., Gore J. M., Rippe J. M., et al., “Transient Right Atrial Thrombus Resulting in Pulmonary Embolism Detected by Two‐Dimensional Echocardiography,” American Heart Journal 108, no. 4, Part 1 (1984): 1047–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Athappan G., Sengodan P., Chacko P., and Gandhi S., “Comparative Efficacy of Different Modalities for Treatment of Right Heart Thrombi in Transit: A Pooled Analysis,” Vascular Medicine 20, no. 2 (2015): 131–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ibrahim W. H., Ata F., Choudry H., et al., “Prevalence, Outcome, and Optimal Management of Free‐Floating Right Heart Thrombi in the Context of Pulmonary Embolism, a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 28 (2022): 10760296221140114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Islam M., Nesheim D., Acquah S., et al., “Right Heart Thrombi: Patient Outcomes by Treatment Modality and Predictors of Mortality: A Pooled Analysis,” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 34, no. 11–12 (2019): 930–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES